Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter
{"title":"英国国家信托基金会选择用于雕像和砖石“消毒”的杀生物剂的研究","authors":"Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter","doi":"10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.","PeriodicalId":43004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","volume":"43 1","pages":"225 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the selection of biocides for the ‘disinfection’ of statues and masonry at the National Trust (UK)\",\"authors\":\"Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Institute of Conservation\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Institute of Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on the selection of biocides for the ‘disinfection’ of statues and masonry at the National Trust (UK)
Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Institute of Conservation is the peer reviewed publication of the Institute of Conservation (Icon). As such, its aims reflect those of Icon, to advance knowledge and education in conservation and achieve the long term preservation and conservation of moveable and immoveable cultural heritage. The Journal provides a collective identity for conservators; it promotes and supports both the profession and professionalism. With international contributions on all aspects of conservation, it is an invaluable resource for the heritage sector. The specific aims of the Journal are to: 1. promote research, knowledge and understanding of cultural heritage conservation through its history, practice and theory 2. provide an international forum to enable and disseminate advances in research, knowledge and understanding relating to conservation and heritage 3. champion and support professional standards of heritage conservation in the UK and internationally 4. provide a permanent record of issues relating to conservation and heritage 5. be financially and operationally sustainable. To achieve these aims, the Journal invites contributions from all those involved in the conservation of cultural heritage and related activities. Areas of interest include understanding cultural heritage materials and their degradation; subject reviews and histories of cultural heritage materials and conservation treatments; new, innovative or improved approaches to conservation and collections care theory, practice, communication, management and training; case studies demonstrating new, innovative or improved approaches; and conservation in its wider context. Submitters are encouraged to demonstrate how their work is of practical application to conservation. To maintain professional standards and promote academic rigour, submissions of articles and shorter notices are subject to an anonymous peer review process.