英国国家信托基金会选择用于雕像和砖石“消毒”的杀生物剂的研究

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Institute of Conservation Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092
Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter
{"title":"英国国家信托基金会选择用于雕像和砖石“消毒”的杀生物剂的研究","authors":"Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter","doi":"10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.","PeriodicalId":43004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","volume":"43 1","pages":"225 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the selection of biocides for the ‘disinfection’ of statues and masonry at the National Trust (UK)\",\"authors\":\"Kris Zykubek, Trevor Proudfoot, K. Lithgow, D. Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Institute of Conservation\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Institute of Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2020.1810092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:为了更新园林雕像维护保护的指导,在英国和欧洲市场上选择了16种杀菌剂,在位于英格兰和威尔士的国民信托(NT)的11处房产进行了原位测试。在测试中,选择了一系列装饰物品、雕像和建筑特征,由各种类型的石头制成,包括石灰石、砂岩、大理石、板岩和花岗岩,以及浇筑的混凝土、陶土和砖。在进行测试之前,评估了当地的小气候和目视检查了物品的状况,包括评估是否存在任何微生物和盐花现象。对以往文物保护工作的历史和材料也进行了回顾。在许多案例中进行了微生物分析,鉴定出各种藻类、地衣和苔藓。使用后24个月定期评估杀菌剂的有效性和任何潜在的副作用。选择了三种最有效的杀菌剂进行进一步评估。使用三磷酸腺苷(ATP)光度计测量应用后7个月和12个月结石上是否有生物生长复发。观察到的副作用包括在使用三种杀菌剂后,卡拉拉大理石偶尔会出现棕色变色。该项目的一项重要成果不仅是建议在需要处理的地方使用哪种杀菌剂,而且还确定何时不宜使用这些杀菌剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on the selection of biocides for the ‘disinfection’ of statues and masonry at the National Trust (UK)
Abstract In order to refresh guidance on garden statuary maintenance conservation, 16 biocides available on the British and European markets were selected for testing in situ at 11 properties of the National Trust (NT) located in England and Wales. For the testing, a range of decorative items, statues and architectural features were chosen, made of various types of stone, including limestone, sandstone, marble, slate and granite, as well as cast concrete, terracotta and brick. Tests were preceded by evaluation of the local microclimate and visual examination of the condition of the objects, including assessment of the presence of any micro-organisms and salt efflorescence. The history of previous conservation works and their materials was also reviewed. Microbiological analysis was carried out in many cases, which identified various algae, lichens and mosses. The effectiveness of the biocides and any potential side effects were evaluated periodically for 24 months after application. Three of the most effective biocides were selected for further assessment. An adenosine triphosphate (ATP) luminometer was used to measure whether biological growth had recurred on the stone at 7 and 12 months after application. Observed side effects included an occasional brown discolouration of Carrara marble after application of three of the biocides tested. An important outcome of the project was not only to recommend which biocides to use where treatment was necessary but also to determine when their use would not be advisable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Institute of Conservation
Journal of the Institute of Conservation HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Institute of Conservation is the peer reviewed publication of the Institute of Conservation (Icon). As such, its aims reflect those of Icon, to advance knowledge and education in conservation and achieve the long term preservation and conservation of moveable and immoveable cultural heritage. The Journal provides a collective identity for conservators; it promotes and supports both the profession and professionalism. With international contributions on all aspects of conservation, it is an invaluable resource for the heritage sector. The specific aims of the Journal are to: 1. promote research, knowledge and understanding of cultural heritage conservation through its history, practice and theory 2. provide an international forum to enable and disseminate advances in research, knowledge and understanding relating to conservation and heritage 3. champion and support professional standards of heritage conservation in the UK and internationally 4. provide a permanent record of issues relating to conservation and heritage 5. be financially and operationally sustainable. To achieve these aims, the Journal invites contributions from all those involved in the conservation of cultural heritage and related activities. Areas of interest include understanding cultural heritage materials and their degradation; subject reviews and histories of cultural heritage materials and conservation treatments; new, innovative or improved approaches to conservation and collections care theory, practice, communication, management and training; case studies demonstrating new, innovative or improved approaches; and conservation in its wider context. Submitters are encouraged to demonstrate how their work is of practical application to conservation. To maintain professional standards and promote academic rigour, submissions of articles and shorter notices are subject to an anonymous peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The prioritisation of development projects and devaluation of cultural heritage: the case of material culture in Wolaita, southern Ethiopia Instilling liveliness: archives of neo-avant-garde art as sites of activation. Predicting the changing insect threat in the UK heritage environment A prognostic and health management approach using colour fade to determine the condition of silk in a museum display environment Marinita Stiglitz reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1