肾细胞癌诊断的基准机器学习算法

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Iranian Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-09-11 DOI:10.5812/iranjradiol-119266
Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie
{"title":"肾细胞癌诊断的基准机器学习算法","authors":"Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-119266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/iranjradiol-119266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-119266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-119266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确鉴别血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)和肾细胞癌(RCC)在诊断肾细胞癌中具有重要意义。目的:本研究旨在评估基于计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的RCC的不同监督机器学习(ML)算法的性能。患者和方法:收集已知RCC或肾AML病例的CT图像,并将其分为训练组和测试组。在MaZda软件中绘制并量化CT图像的纹理特征;从每个图像中总共绘制了352个特征。在训练组中,选择对RCC与良性肿瘤的鉴别具有统计学意义的前10个特征,基于16种监督ML算法建立诊断模型。接下来,对模型的准确性和特异性进行了比较。通过与测试组的数据进行比较,对训练后的模型进行了进一步检查。结果:在本研究训练的16个分类器中,逻辑回归、线性判别分析、k近邻算法、支持向量机(SVM)、山脊分类器、AdaBoost分类器、梯度提升分类器、,在训练和测试数据集中,CatBoost分类器在区分RCC和AML方面表现出良好的性能(准确度≥0.7;(受试者操作特征(ROC))曲线下面积(AUC)≥0.75)。结论:基于大数据的ML算法,诊断分类器可以成为准确诊断RCC的有价值的工具。通过比较不同的算法,目前的结果表明了开发RCC诊断分类器的潜在算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Iranian Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature. This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration. The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics. Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement: 1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers. 2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal. 3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally. Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Application of Elastography in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis (IGM): A Systematic Review Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatic Metastasis of Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Report of Five Patients Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Findings of Intracranial Chondroma and Chondrosarcoma with a Non-Skull Base Origin: A Report of Two Cases Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Characteristics and Dimensions of Calcified Plaques and Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Improvement of Bone Age Assessment Using a Deep Learning Model in Young Children: Significance of Carpal Bone Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1