Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie
{"title":"肾细胞癌诊断的基准机器学习算法","authors":"Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-119266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Tao Dai, Shuai Zhu, Fuchang Han, Mingji Ye, Wang Xiang, W. Tan, Xiaming Pei, Shenghui Liao, Y. Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/iranjradiol-119266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-119266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-119266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Background: Accurate differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is important in RCC diagnosis. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for RCC based on computed tomography (CT) examinations. Patients and Methods: The CT images of known cases of RCC or renal AML were collected and divided into training and testing groups. The texture features of CT images were drawn and quantified in MaZda software; a total of 352 features were drawn from each image. Top 10 features with statistical significance for differentiation of RCC from benign tumors in the training group were selected to establish diagnosis models based on 16 supervised ML algorithms. Next, the models were compared regarding accuracy and specificity. The trained models were further examined by comparison with data from the testing group. Results: Among 16 classifiers trained in this study, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, support vector machines (SVMs), ridge classifier, AdaBoost classifier, gradient boosting classifier, and CatBoost classifier showed good performance in discriminating RCC from AML (accuracy, ≥ 0.7; area under the (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75) in both training and testing datasets. Conclusion: Based on the ML algorithms for big data, diagnostic classifiers can be valuable tools for an accurate diagnosis of RCC. By comparing different algorithms, the present results indicated potential algorithms for the development of RCC diagnostic classifiers.
期刊介绍:
The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature.
This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration.
The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics.
Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement:
1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers.
2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal.
3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally.
Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.