{"title":"谴责一项不存在的罪行是对调查的严重阻碍?司法实践中的两个问题","authors":"Luciano A. Cisternas Velis","doi":"10.4067/s0718-33992021000200846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper questions the judicial practice wich subsume the criminal complaint of a non-existent crime in article 269 bis of the Chilean Criminal Code. Two problems are identified about the interpretation of the verb «provide» and the legal requirement «criminal offence», and the study concludes the non-criminality of the act respect the obstruction of criminal investigation.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿La denuncia de un delito inexistente como obstrucción grave a la investigación? Dos problemas en la praxis judicial\",\"authors\":\"Luciano A. Cisternas Velis\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-33992021000200846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper questions the judicial practice wich subsume the criminal complaint of a non-existent crime in article 269 bis of the Chilean Criminal Code. Two problems are identified about the interpretation of the verb «provide» and the legal requirement «criminal offence», and the study concludes the non-criminality of the act respect the obstruction of criminal investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politica Criminal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politica Criminal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992021000200846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politica Criminal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992021000200846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
¿La denuncia de un delito inexistente como obstrucción grave a la investigación? Dos problemas en la praxis judicial
This paper questions the judicial practice wich subsume the criminal complaint of a non-existent crime in article 269 bis of the Chilean Criminal Code. Two problems are identified about the interpretation of the verb «provide» and the legal requirement «criminal offence», and the study concludes the non-criminality of the act respect the obstruction of criminal investigation.