加州酿酒葡萄种植者的环境价值以及将仓鸮巢箱作为综合虫害管理工具的使用

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 FISHERIES California Fish and Wildlife Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.11
Brooks R. Estes, Matthew D. Johnson
{"title":"加州酿酒葡萄种植者的环境价值以及将仓鸮巢箱作为综合虫害管理工具的使用","authors":"Brooks R. Estes, Matthew D. Johnson","doi":"10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synthetic pesticides from agriculture pose threats to biodiversity, and the adoption of alternative pest management is vital to meet rising crop demands while protecting native species. For example, the use of nest boxes for barn owls (Tyto furcata and T. alba) may help control rodent pests and reduce the use of rodenticides. However, the environmental perceptions of farmers and how receptive they are to alternative pest management practices remains uncertain. Traditionally, agricultural policies and programs have focused largely on the economic self-interest of farmers, but these narrow approaches have proven insufficient to describe and predict conservation behaviors, and the study of environmental value orientations (EVOs) may better explain farmers’ adoption of novel wildlife-friendly practices. The study of EVOs can help identify people as “mutualists”, meaning those who value the environment for its own sake, and “utilitarians,” meaning those who value the environment for the services it can provide. We surveyed 71 California winegrape growers in order to better understand how their underlying environmental values relate to the use of barn owl boxes and other sustainable practices. Overall, most winegrape growers had mutualist value orientations (64%). However, there was a disconnect between the use of barn owl boxes and EVOs, with most respondents (80%) reporting the use of owl boxes regardless of underlying values. This opens the door for future research to examine whether this is true of other wildlife-friendly farming practices.","PeriodicalId":29697,"journal":{"name":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental values of California winegrape growers and the use of barn owl nest boxes as a tool for integrated pest management\",\"authors\":\"Brooks R. Estes, Matthew D. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Synthetic pesticides from agriculture pose threats to biodiversity, and the adoption of alternative pest management is vital to meet rising crop demands while protecting native species. For example, the use of nest boxes for barn owls (Tyto furcata and T. alba) may help control rodent pests and reduce the use of rodenticides. However, the environmental perceptions of farmers and how receptive they are to alternative pest management practices remains uncertain. Traditionally, agricultural policies and programs have focused largely on the economic self-interest of farmers, but these narrow approaches have proven insufficient to describe and predict conservation behaviors, and the study of environmental value orientations (EVOs) may better explain farmers’ adoption of novel wildlife-friendly practices. The study of EVOs can help identify people as “mutualists”, meaning those who value the environment for its own sake, and “utilitarians,” meaning those who value the environment for the services it can provide. We surveyed 71 California winegrape growers in order to better understand how their underlying environmental values relate to the use of barn owl boxes and other sustainable practices. Overall, most winegrape growers had mutualist value orientations (64%). However, there was a disconnect between the use of barn owl boxes and EVOs, with most respondents (80%) reporting the use of owl boxes regardless of underlying values. This opens the door for future research to examine whether this is true of other wildlife-friendly farming practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"California Fish and Wildlife Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"California Fish and Wildlife Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业合成农药对生物多样性构成威胁,采用替代性害虫管理对于满足日益增长的作物需求同时保护本地物种至关重要。例如,为仓鸮(Tyto furcata和T.alba)使用巢箱可能有助于控制啮齿动物害虫并减少灭鼠剂的使用。然而,农民对环境的看法以及他们对替代虫害管理做法的接受程度仍然不确定。传统上,农业政策和计划主要关注农民的经济私利,但事实证明,这些狭隘的方法不足以描述和预测保护行为,对环境价值取向的研究可能会更好地解释农民采用新的野生动物友好做法。对EVO的研究有助于将人们识别为“互惠主义者”,即那些为了环境本身而重视环境的人,以及“功利主义者”,指那些为了环境所能提供的服务而重视环境。我们调查了71名加州酿酒葡萄种植者,以更好地了解他们的潜在环境价值与仓鸮箱和其他可持续做法的使用之间的关系。总体而言,大多数酿酒葡萄种植者都有互惠价值取向(64%)。然而,仓鸮箱的使用与EVO之间存在脱节,大多数受访者(80%)报告称,无论潜在价值如何,都会使用猫头鹰箱。这为未来的研究打开了大门,以检验其他野生动物友好型农业做法是否属实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental values of California winegrape growers and the use of barn owl nest boxes as a tool for integrated pest management
Synthetic pesticides from agriculture pose threats to biodiversity, and the adoption of alternative pest management is vital to meet rising crop demands while protecting native species. For example, the use of nest boxes for barn owls (Tyto furcata and T. alba) may help control rodent pests and reduce the use of rodenticides. However, the environmental perceptions of farmers and how receptive they are to alternative pest management practices remains uncertain. Traditionally, agricultural policies and programs have focused largely on the economic self-interest of farmers, but these narrow approaches have proven insufficient to describe and predict conservation behaviors, and the study of environmental value orientations (EVOs) may better explain farmers’ adoption of novel wildlife-friendly practices. The study of EVOs can help identify people as “mutualists”, meaning those who value the environment for its own sake, and “utilitarians,” meaning those who value the environment for the services it can provide. We surveyed 71 California winegrape growers in order to better understand how their underlying environmental values relate to the use of barn owl boxes and other sustainable practices. Overall, most winegrape growers had mutualist value orientations (64%). However, there was a disconnect between the use of barn owl boxes and EVOs, with most respondents (80%) reporting the use of owl boxes regardless of underlying values. This opens the door for future research to examine whether this is true of other wildlife-friendly farming practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tricolored blackbird survey methods Short-term movement patterns of the Pacific sleeper shark off California Isabelline coloration: a heretofore unrecognized chromatic aberration in bighorn sheep Rescuing and monitoring White Sturgeon during drought on the Tuolumne River Trends in pinniped interactions with commercial passenger fisheries vessels in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1