印度东北部部分地区的应力状态:具有敏感性分析的钻孔塌陷模型

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Petroleum Geoscience Pub Date : 2022-05-12 DOI:10.1144/petgeo2021-059
J. Alam, R. Chatterjee, S. Dasgupta, B. Das
{"title":"印度东北部部分地区的应力状态:具有敏感性分析的钻孔塌陷模型","authors":"J. Alam, R. Chatterjee, S. Dasgupta, B. Das","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2021-059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural heterogeneities and tectonic forces in North-East India give rise to changeable in-situ stresses with varying orientations in this part of India. Wells located in the seismic gap in Upper Assam, Naga Thrust and Chittagong-Mizoram-Tripura fold belt of Mizoram are considered for studying the stress state and borehole collapse models for the area. The absence of stress studies in the Mizoram area acts as a stimulator to take up stress studies. Poroelastic modeling shows an average ratio of maximum horizontal to vertical stress to be 0.79 for normal faulted, 1.18 for thrust faulted and 1.12 in strike-slip faulted regimes. The SH direction varies from 193°N in Upper Assam to 213°N in Mizoram areas. The image log in a well of the Mizoram area shows the rotation of SH direction (≈85°) from 500m to 3707m due to structural heterogeneity. The thrust and strike-slip regimes under the study area pose the major threat for safe borehole drilling in this complex terrain. To mitigate this issue, Mohr-Coulomb (MC) and Mogi-Coulomb (MG) rock failure criteria are discussed to predict minimum mud weight for borehole drilling. MG predicted mud weight (MW) ensures borehole stability in wells in normal faulted sediments while MC predicted MW prevents shear failure in wells in thrust and strike-slip regimes. A disc plot is used to model a stable wellbore drilling path with minimum MW is modeled using a disc plot. A vertical well is stable in a normal faulted regime whereas horizontal drilling is preferable in the fold-thrust belt. Sensitivity analysis of geomechanical input parameters on MW using Monte Carlo Simulation shows that SH has the maximum effect on MW regardless of the faulting regimes.","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress state in parts of North-East India: borehole collapse modelling with sensitivity analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Alam, R. Chatterjee, S. Dasgupta, B. Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/petgeo2021-059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural heterogeneities and tectonic forces in North-East India give rise to changeable in-situ stresses with varying orientations in this part of India. Wells located in the seismic gap in Upper Assam, Naga Thrust and Chittagong-Mizoram-Tripura fold belt of Mizoram are considered for studying the stress state and borehole collapse models for the area. The absence of stress studies in the Mizoram area acts as a stimulator to take up stress studies. Poroelastic modeling shows an average ratio of maximum horizontal to vertical stress to be 0.79 for normal faulted, 1.18 for thrust faulted and 1.12 in strike-slip faulted regimes. The SH direction varies from 193°N in Upper Assam to 213°N in Mizoram areas. The image log in a well of the Mizoram area shows the rotation of SH direction (≈85°) from 500m to 3707m due to structural heterogeneity. The thrust and strike-slip regimes under the study area pose the major threat for safe borehole drilling in this complex terrain. To mitigate this issue, Mohr-Coulomb (MC) and Mogi-Coulomb (MG) rock failure criteria are discussed to predict minimum mud weight for borehole drilling. MG predicted mud weight (MW) ensures borehole stability in wells in normal faulted sediments while MC predicted MW prevents shear failure in wells in thrust and strike-slip regimes. A disc plot is used to model a stable wellbore drilling path with minimum MW is modeled using a disc plot. A vertical well is stable in a normal faulted regime whereas horizontal drilling is preferable in the fold-thrust belt. Sensitivity analysis of geomechanical input parameters on MW using Monte Carlo Simulation shows that SH has the maximum effect on MW regardless of the faulting regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度东北部的结构不均匀性和构造力导致了印度这一地区不同方向的可变地应力。考虑位于上阿萨姆邦地震间隙、纳加冲断层和米佐拉姆邦吉大港-米佐拉姆-特里普拉褶皱带的油井,以研究该地区的应力状态和钻孔坍塌模型。米佐拉姆地区缺乏压力研究,这刺激了压力研究的开展。孔隙弹性模型显示,正常断层的最大水平应力与垂直应力的平均比值为0.79,逆冲断层为1.18,走滑断层为1.12。SH方向从上阿萨姆邦的193°N到米佐拉姆地区的213°N不等。米佐拉姆地区一口井的图像测井显示,由于结构不均匀性,SH方向(≈85°)从500米旋转到3707米。研究区下的逆冲和走滑状态对在这种复杂地形中进行安全钻孔构成了主要威胁。为了缓解这一问题,讨论了莫尔-库仑(MC)和莫吉-库仑(MG)岩石破坏准则,以预测钻孔的最小泥浆重量。MG预测的泥浆重量(MW)确保了正常断层沉积物中井眼的稳定性,而MC预测的MW防止了逆冲和走滑状态下井眼的剪切破坏。圆盘图用于模拟具有最小MW的稳定井筒钻井路径。圆盘图用于建模。垂直井在正常断裂状态下是稳定的,而水平钻井在褶皱-逆冲带中是优选的。利用蒙特卡罗模拟对地质力学输入参数对MW的敏感性分析表明,无论断裂机制如何,SH对MW的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stress state in parts of North-East India: borehole collapse modelling with sensitivity analysis
Structural heterogeneities and tectonic forces in North-East India give rise to changeable in-situ stresses with varying orientations in this part of India. Wells located in the seismic gap in Upper Assam, Naga Thrust and Chittagong-Mizoram-Tripura fold belt of Mizoram are considered for studying the stress state and borehole collapse models for the area. The absence of stress studies in the Mizoram area acts as a stimulator to take up stress studies. Poroelastic modeling shows an average ratio of maximum horizontal to vertical stress to be 0.79 for normal faulted, 1.18 for thrust faulted and 1.12 in strike-slip faulted regimes. The SH direction varies from 193°N in Upper Assam to 213°N in Mizoram areas. The image log in a well of the Mizoram area shows the rotation of SH direction (≈85°) from 500m to 3707m due to structural heterogeneity. The thrust and strike-slip regimes under the study area pose the major threat for safe borehole drilling in this complex terrain. To mitigate this issue, Mohr-Coulomb (MC) and Mogi-Coulomb (MG) rock failure criteria are discussed to predict minimum mud weight for borehole drilling. MG predicted mud weight (MW) ensures borehole stability in wells in normal faulted sediments while MC predicted MW prevents shear failure in wells in thrust and strike-slip regimes. A disc plot is used to model a stable wellbore drilling path with minimum MW is modeled using a disc plot. A vertical well is stable in a normal faulted regime whereas horizontal drilling is preferable in the fold-thrust belt. Sensitivity analysis of geomechanical input parameters on MW using Monte Carlo Simulation shows that SH has the maximum effect on MW regardless of the faulting regimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Geoscience
Petroleum Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE). Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership. Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.
期刊最新文献
The influence of sedimentary facies, mineralogy, and diagenesis on reservoir properties of the coal-bearing Upper Carboniferous of NW Germany Natural fractures at depth in shale reservoirs: new insights from the southern Sichuan Basin marine shales Petrographic and Petrophysical Characterization of Pre-salt Aptian Carbonate Reservoirs from The Santos Basin, Brazil Simultaneous Well Spacing and Completion Optimization Using Automated Machine Learning Approach. A Case Study of Marcellus Shale Reservoir in the North-Eastern United States Assessing the impact of hydrodynamics on capillary seal capacity: application of the Manzocchi & Childs model in trap analysis workflows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1