脑瘫患者替代沟通资源的身体功能:系统回顾

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION Technology and Disability Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI:10.3233/tad-200299
R. C. do Nascimento Givigi, Edênia Menezes da Cunha, Jerriany Tainá Pereira de Souza, Lillian Muniz Oliveira, S. S. F. Dourado
{"title":"脑瘫患者替代沟通资源的身体功能:系统回顾","authors":"R. C. do Nascimento Givigi, Edênia Menezes da Cunha, Jerriany Tainá Pereira de Souza, Lillian Muniz Oliveira, S. S. F. Dourado","doi":"10.3233/tad-200299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems are used by people with motor disabilities, such as those with cerebral palsy (CP). The assessment of physical functional skills is crucial for appropriately choosing the computer access tool. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to do a systematic literature review addressing the importance of the analysis of physical functional performance for the construction of specific tools to support communication. METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched articles from 2009 to 2021 using three databases (PubMed, Lilacs in Portuguese, and SciELO). Three reviewers extracted the data. Registration was made to PROSPERO. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: We found 132 articles in the databases. First, we excluded 31 articles because they did not provide evidence for the use of alternative communication in people with CP and did not use high technology resources. We also excluded 57 duplicated articles. At the end of this first step, 44 articles were left, 38 of them were excluded because they are not clinical trials. We selected 6 articles for the final analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review had a positive impact on the precise dissemination of knowledge ensuring comparisons of interventions and articles such as assistive technology programs.","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical functionality of alternative communication resources on people with cerebral palsy: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"R. C. do Nascimento Givigi, Edênia Menezes da Cunha, Jerriany Tainá Pereira de Souza, Lillian Muniz Oliveira, S. S. F. Dourado\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/tad-200299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems are used by people with motor disabilities, such as those with cerebral palsy (CP). The assessment of physical functional skills is crucial for appropriately choosing the computer access tool. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to do a systematic literature review addressing the importance of the analysis of physical functional performance for the construction of specific tools to support communication. METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched articles from 2009 to 2021 using three databases (PubMed, Lilacs in Portuguese, and SciELO). Three reviewers extracted the data. Registration was made to PROSPERO. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: We found 132 articles in the databases. First, we excluded 31 articles because they did not provide evidence for the use of alternative communication in people with CP and did not use high technology resources. We also excluded 57 duplicated articles. At the end of this first step, 44 articles were left, 38 of them were excluded because they are not clinical trials. We selected 6 articles for the final analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review had a positive impact on the precise dissemination of knowledge ensuring comparisons of interventions and articles such as assistive technology programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-200299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-200299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:辅助和替代沟通(AAC)系统用于运动障碍患者,如脑瘫患者。身体功能技能的评估对于正确选择计算机访问工具至关重要。目的:本研究旨在进行系统的文献综述,探讨身体功能表现分析对构建支持沟通的特定工具的重要性。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行综述。我们使用三个数据库(PubMed、Lilacs in Portuguese和SciELO)检索了2009年至2021年的文章。三位审稿人提取了数据。登记在普洛斯彼罗。使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。结果:共检索到132篇文献。首先,我们排除了31篇文章,因为它们没有为CP患者使用替代通信提供证据,也没有使用高科技资源。我们还排除了57篇重复文章。第一步结束时,还剩下44篇文章,其中38篇因为不是临床试验而被排除。我们选择了6篇文章进行最后的分析。结论:系统评价对知识的准确传播有积极的影响,确保了干预措施和文章(如辅助技术方案)的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical functionality of alternative communication resources on people with cerebral palsy: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems are used by people with motor disabilities, such as those with cerebral palsy (CP). The assessment of physical functional skills is crucial for appropriately choosing the computer access tool. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to do a systematic literature review addressing the importance of the analysis of physical functional performance for the construction of specific tools to support communication. METHODS: The review followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched articles from 2009 to 2021 using three databases (PubMed, Lilacs in Portuguese, and SciELO). Three reviewers extracted the data. Registration was made to PROSPERO. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: We found 132 articles in the databases. First, we excluded 31 articles because they did not provide evidence for the use of alternative communication in people with CP and did not use high technology resources. We also excluded 57 duplicated articles. At the end of this first step, 44 articles were left, 38 of them were excluded because they are not clinical trials. We selected 6 articles for the final analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review had a positive impact on the precise dissemination of knowledge ensuring comparisons of interventions and articles such as assistive technology programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Disability
Technology and Disability Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.
期刊最新文献
A study of wheelchair, movement and environmental factors associated with concerns about falls among wheelchairs users Multisensory computer-based system for teaching sentence reading in Hindi and Bangla to children with dyslexia Inaccessibility maps to support sighted people using visually impaired people’s white cane data Design and development of a low-cost device to measure foot parameters in children with disability: A “footmeter” A comparative evaluation of sliding contact tactile systems displaying braille and raised print
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1