新冠肺炎阳性患者中SARS-CoV-2变异株的患病率

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Klimik Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.36519/kd.2022.4264
Okan Aydoğan, Ezgi Gozun Saylan, O. Guven, Akif Ayaz, Turkan Yigitbasi
{"title":"新冠肺炎阳性患者中SARS-CoV-2变异株的患病率","authors":"Okan Aydoğan, Ezgi Gozun Saylan, O. Guven, Akif Ayaz, Turkan Yigitbasi","doi":"10.36519/kd.2022.4264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Of the existing variants, alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) were defined as variants of concern (VOCs) by World Health Organization. We aimed to retrospectively assess the distribution of VOCs in patients with positive COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.\n\nMethods: Between April 2021 and December 31, 2021, 4260 patients whose clinical samples were sent with a COVID-19 PCR test request were included in the study. Of the patients whose samples were evaluated, 2173 (51%) were male, and 2087 (49%) were female. Viral nucleic acid isolation was performed by treating nasopharyngeal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage, and tracheal aspirate samples with viral nucleic acid buffer (vNAT).\n\nSARS-CoV-2 variants were detected by Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Variant Plus kit (Bioeksen AR-GE Technologies, Turkey), which targets variant-specific genome regions only found in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 as well as ORF1ab and N gene regions. We used Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Emerging Plus kit and CFX96 DX real-time PCR system to detect SARS-Cov-2 variants; N D3L mutation was targeted to detect the alpha variant, SL452R mutation to detect the delta variant, and S E484K mutation, which is widespread, to detect the gamma and the mu variants.\n\nResults: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive in 773 (18.14%) of 4260 samples, and different SARS-CoV-2 variants were detected in 316 (40.88%) of positive samples. 407 (52.65%) of the patients with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive test were women, and the mean age was 41.7 years. While no variant type was detected in 457 (59.12%) of the patients, the alpha variant was detected in 156 (20.18%) and the delta variants in 137 (17.72%) patients.\n\nConclusion: In our study, we found that the alpha variant was the dominant type in April, May, and June, and the delta variant became dominant as of July until the end of the year. Decreased rates of delta variants towards the end of 2021 and an increase in the other variants suggest the omicron variant, widely spread globally. Therefore, we believe that the omicron variant has been our country’s dominant type since November 2021. In conclusion, molecular surveillance studies that are planned in the light of epidemiological data and assessment of the frequency and genomic analyzes of regional and global variants are required.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in COVID-19 Positive Patients\",\"authors\":\"Okan Aydoğan, Ezgi Gozun Saylan, O. Guven, Akif Ayaz, Turkan Yigitbasi\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/kd.2022.4264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Of the existing variants, alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) were defined as variants of concern (VOCs) by World Health Organization. We aimed to retrospectively assess the distribution of VOCs in patients with positive COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.\\n\\nMethods: Between April 2021 and December 31, 2021, 4260 patients whose clinical samples were sent with a COVID-19 PCR test request were included in the study. Of the patients whose samples were evaluated, 2173 (51%) were male, and 2087 (49%) were female. Viral nucleic acid isolation was performed by treating nasopharyngeal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage, and tracheal aspirate samples with viral nucleic acid buffer (vNAT).\\n\\nSARS-CoV-2 variants were detected by Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Variant Plus kit (Bioeksen AR-GE Technologies, Turkey), which targets variant-specific genome regions only found in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 as well as ORF1ab and N gene regions. We used Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Emerging Plus kit and CFX96 DX real-time PCR system to detect SARS-Cov-2 variants; N D3L mutation was targeted to detect the alpha variant, SL452R mutation to detect the delta variant, and S E484K mutation, which is widespread, to detect the gamma and the mu variants.\\n\\nResults: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive in 773 (18.14%) of 4260 samples, and different SARS-CoV-2 variants were detected in 316 (40.88%) of positive samples. 407 (52.65%) of the patients with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive test were women, and the mean age was 41.7 years. While no variant type was detected in 457 (59.12%) of the patients, the alpha variant was detected in 156 (20.18%) and the delta variants in 137 (17.72%) patients.\\n\\nConclusion: In our study, we found that the alpha variant was the dominant type in April, May, and June, and the delta variant became dominant as of July until the end of the year. Decreased rates of delta variants towards the end of 2021 and an increase in the other variants suggest the omicron variant, widely spread globally. Therefore, we believe that the omicron variant has been our country’s dominant type since November 2021. In conclusion, molecular surveillance studies that are planned in the light of epidemiological data and assessment of the frequency and genomic analyzes of regional and global variants are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.4264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.4264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:在现有的变异株中,α(B.1.1.7)、β(B.1.351)、γ(P.1)、德尔塔(B.1.617.2)和奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)被世界卫生组织定义为变异毒株(VOCs)。我们旨在回顾性评估新冠肺炎实时聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)检测呈阳性的患者中VOCs的分布。方法:在2021年4月至2021年12月31日期间,4260名临床样本随新冠肺炎PCR检测请求发送的患者被纳入研究。在评估样本的患者中,2173名(51%)为男性,2087名(49%)为女性。病毒核酸分离是通过用病毒核酸缓冲液(vNAT)处理鼻咽拭子、支气管肺泡灌洗和气管吸出物样本来进行的。通过Bio-Speedy®严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型变体+试剂盒(Bioeksen AR-GE Technologies,Turkey)检测严重急性呼吸系冠状病毒2型变异,该试剂盒针对仅在B.1.1.7、B.1.351,和P.1以及ORF1ab和N基因区域。我们使用Bio-Speedy®严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型Emerging Plus试剂盒和CFX96 DX实时PCR系统来检测严重急性呼吸系综合征冠状病毒-2型变异株;针对N D3L突变检测α变体,SL452R突变检测德尔塔变体,以及广泛存在的S E484K突变检测γ和μ变体。结果:在4260份样本中,773份(18.14%)样本中检测出严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RT-PCR阳性,316份(40.88%)阳性样本中检测到不同的严重急性呼吸系冠状病毒2型变异株。407例(52.65%)实时聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)阳性患者为女性,平均年龄41.7岁。457名患者(59.12%)未检测到变异类型,156名患者(20.18%)检测到α变异,137名患者(17.72%)检测到德尔塔变异。结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现阿尔法变体在4月、5月和6月是主要类型,而德尔塔变体在7月一直占主导地位,直到年底。2021年底,德尔塔变异株的发病率下降,其他变异株的增加表明奥密克戎变异株在全球广泛传播。因此,我们认为,自2021年11月以来,奥密克戎变异株一直是我国的主要类型。总之,需要根据流行病学数据、区域和全球变异频率评估和基因组分析进行分子监测研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in COVID-19 Positive Patients
Objective: Of the existing variants, alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) were defined as variants of concern (VOCs) by World Health Organization. We aimed to retrospectively assess the distribution of VOCs in patients with positive COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Methods: Between April 2021 and December 31, 2021, 4260 patients whose clinical samples were sent with a COVID-19 PCR test request were included in the study. Of the patients whose samples were evaluated, 2173 (51%) were male, and 2087 (49%) were female. Viral nucleic acid isolation was performed by treating nasopharyngeal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage, and tracheal aspirate samples with viral nucleic acid buffer (vNAT). SARS-CoV-2 variants were detected by Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Variant Plus kit (Bioeksen AR-GE Technologies, Turkey), which targets variant-specific genome regions only found in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 as well as ORF1ab and N gene regions. We used Bio-Speedy® SARS-CoV-2 Emerging Plus kit and CFX96 DX real-time PCR system to detect SARS-Cov-2 variants; N D3L mutation was targeted to detect the alpha variant, SL452R mutation to detect the delta variant, and S E484K mutation, which is widespread, to detect the gamma and the mu variants. Results: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive in 773 (18.14%) of 4260 samples, and different SARS-CoV-2 variants were detected in 316 (40.88%) of positive samples. 407 (52.65%) of the patients with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive test were women, and the mean age was 41.7 years. While no variant type was detected in 457 (59.12%) of the patients, the alpha variant was detected in 156 (20.18%) and the delta variants in 137 (17.72%) patients. Conclusion: In our study, we found that the alpha variant was the dominant type in April, May, and June, and the delta variant became dominant as of July until the end of the year. Decreased rates of delta variants towards the end of 2021 and an increase in the other variants suggest the omicron variant, widely spread globally. Therefore, we believe that the omicron variant has been our country’s dominant type since November 2021. In conclusion, molecular surveillance studies that are planned in the light of epidemiological data and assessment of the frequency and genomic analyzes of regional and global variants are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Fourth-year Results of HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Discontinuing Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Resistance Rates in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Evaluation The Incidence and Factors Affecting the 28-day Hospital Admission Among Adult Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients Correlation of Real-Time PCR Cycle Threshold Values and Clinical Progress, Mortality, and Laboratory Parameters of COVID-19 Patients Evaluation of Risk Factors Causing Nosocomial Acinetobacter Bacteremia and Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1