韦格兰的《致云杉》之争。理想主义、现代主义、现实主义

Erik Bjerck Hagen
{"title":"韦格兰的《致云杉》之争。理想主义、现代主义、现实主义","authors":"Erik Bjerck Hagen","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1500-1989-2021-01-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I discuss different readings of Henrik Wergeland’s well-known poem “Til en Gran” (1833) as they fall into line with the three main currents that have dominated Norwegian literary scholarship generally and the recep-tion of Norwegian Romanticism specifically: idealism, realism, and modernism. Idealistic interpretations from Fredrik Paasche to Per Thomas Andersen, as well as a modernist reading found in Jørgen Sejersted’s and Eirik Vas-senden’s Lyrikkhåndboken , are discarded as being too dependent on the theoretical premises constituting idealism and modernism respectively. A realistic interpretation is suggested as an alternative, in dialogue with a somewhat neglected study by Leif Johan Larsen (2002). In a final section, I discuss the theoretical problems that may befall even a realistic reading.","PeriodicalId":56248,"journal":{"name":"Edda","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striden om Wergelands «Til en Gran». Idealisme, modernisme, realisme\",\"authors\":\"Erik Bjerck Hagen\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.1500-1989-2021-01-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I discuss different readings of Henrik Wergeland’s well-known poem “Til en Gran” (1833) as they fall into line with the three main currents that have dominated Norwegian literary scholarship generally and the recep-tion of Norwegian Romanticism specifically: idealism, realism, and modernism. Idealistic interpretations from Fredrik Paasche to Per Thomas Andersen, as well as a modernist reading found in Jørgen Sejersted’s and Eirik Vas-senden’s Lyrikkhåndboken , are discarded as being too dependent on the theoretical premises constituting idealism and modernism respectively. A realistic interpretation is suggested as an alternative, in dialogue with a somewhat neglected study by Leif Johan Larsen (2002). In a final section, I discuss the theoretical problems that may befall even a realistic reading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edda\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1500-1989-2021-01-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1500-1989-2021-01-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我讨论了对Henrik Wergeland著名诗歌《Til en Gran》(1833)的不同解读,因为它们符合主导挪威文学学术和挪威浪漫主义最近发展的三大主流:理想主义、现实主义和现代主义。弗雷德里克·帕什(Fredrik Paasche)到佩尔·托马斯·安徒生(Per Thomas Andersen)的理想主义解读,以及Jørgen Sejersted和Eirik Vas senden的Lyrikkhåndboken中的现代主义解读,都被认为过于依赖于分别构成理想主义和现代主义的理论前提而被抛弃。在与Leif Johan Larsen(2002)的一项被忽视的研究对话中,提出了一种现实主义的解释作为替代方案。在最后一节中,我讨论了即使是现实主义阅读也可能遇到的理论问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Striden om Wergelands «Til en Gran». Idealisme, modernisme, realisme
In this article, I discuss different readings of Henrik Wergeland’s well-known poem “Til en Gran” (1833) as they fall into line with the three main currents that have dominated Norwegian literary scholarship generally and the recep-tion of Norwegian Romanticism specifically: idealism, realism, and modernism. Idealistic interpretations from Fredrik Paasche to Per Thomas Andersen, as well as a modernist reading found in Jørgen Sejersted’s and Eirik Vas-senden’s Lyrikkhåndboken , are discarded as being too dependent on the theoretical premises constituting idealism and modernism respectively. A realistic interpretation is suggested as an alternative, in dialogue with a somewhat neglected study by Leif Johan Larsen (2002). In a final section, I discuss the theoretical problems that may befall even a realistic reading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arms and the Men: Linnea Axelsson’s Ædnan (2018) and the Epic Tradition Pappaförvandlingar Tekstar på tur Litteraturkritikkens leksikonEirikVassendenKritikerens spøkelse. Om kunsten å felle smaksdommer i det 21. århundret229 siderPelikanen Forlag AS2023ISBN: 978-82-8383-138-2 Att hålla konsten vid livPerBäckströmAllt kan bli aktiverat och skapande liv: Öyvind Fahlströms processuella estetik535 siderEllerströms förlag2023ISBN: 9789172477032
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1