风格装饰是文艺复兴风格弯曲的前提

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Italianist Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454
R. Henke
{"title":"风格装饰是文艺复兴风格弯曲的前提","authors":"R. Henke","doi":"10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Early modern arguments by Giason Denores, Ben Jonson, John Milton, and others for genre integrity and against genre mixing are worth examining on their own terms. For one thing, the claim for genre integrity was often accompanied by a fierce belief in the political relevance of dramatic genres to which we today would be very sympathetic. Moreover, many early modern approaches to mixed genres, such as Battista Guarini’s argument for tragicomedy on the basis of both his play Il pastor fido and a series of theoretical treatises he wrote against his antagonist Giason Denores, actually depended upon the principle of genre integrity. Early modern tragicomedy, as articulated by Guarini and as practised by Shakespeare in his late plays, was designed not to contrast unstably comedic and tragedic effects and perspectives, unlike Beckett’s modern tragicomedy Waiting for Godot, for example, but to fashion its own, aesthetically unified form under the aegis of mixture.","PeriodicalId":42720,"journal":{"name":"Italianist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genre Decorum as Precondition of Renaissance Genre-Bending\",\"authors\":\"R. Henke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Early modern arguments by Giason Denores, Ben Jonson, John Milton, and others for genre integrity and against genre mixing are worth examining on their own terms. For one thing, the claim for genre integrity was often accompanied by a fierce belief in the political relevance of dramatic genres to which we today would be very sympathetic. Moreover, many early modern approaches to mixed genres, such as Battista Guarini’s argument for tragicomedy on the basis of both his play Il pastor fido and a series of theoretical treatises he wrote against his antagonist Giason Denores, actually depended upon the principle of genre integrity. Early modern tragicomedy, as articulated by Guarini and as practised by Shakespeare in his late plays, was designed not to contrast unstably comedic and tragedic effects and perspectives, unlike Beckett’s modern tragicomedy Waiting for Godot, for example, but to fashion its own, aesthetically unified form under the aegis of mixture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italianist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italianist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italianist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2020.1901454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要贾森·德诺雷斯、本·琼森、约翰·米尔顿等人关于流派完整性和反对流派混合的早期现代论点值得从他们自己的角度来审视。首先,对类型完整性的主张往往伴随着对戏剧类型的政治相关性的强烈信念,而我们今天对此深表同情。此外,许多早期现代混合流派的方法,如巴蒂斯塔·瓜里尼基于他的戏剧《牧师》和他针对对手贾森·德诺雷斯写的一系列理论论文对悲喜剧的论证,实际上都依赖于流派完整性原则。早期现代悲喜剧,正如瓜里尼所阐述的,以及莎士比亚在其晚期戏剧中所实践的那样,与贝克特的现代悲喜剧《等待戈多》不同,其设计目的不是为了对比不稳定的喜剧和悲剧效果和视角,而是在混合的支持下形成自己的、美学上统一的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genre Decorum as Precondition of Renaissance Genre-Bending
ABSTRACT Early modern arguments by Giason Denores, Ben Jonson, John Milton, and others for genre integrity and against genre mixing are worth examining on their own terms. For one thing, the claim for genre integrity was often accompanied by a fierce belief in the political relevance of dramatic genres to which we today would be very sympathetic. Moreover, many early modern approaches to mixed genres, such as Battista Guarini’s argument for tragicomedy on the basis of both his play Il pastor fido and a series of theoretical treatises he wrote against his antagonist Giason Denores, actually depended upon the principle of genre integrity. Early modern tragicomedy, as articulated by Guarini and as practised by Shakespeare in his late plays, was designed not to contrast unstably comedic and tragedic effects and perspectives, unlike Beckett’s modern tragicomedy Waiting for Godot, for example, but to fashion its own, aesthetically unified form under the aegis of mixture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italianist
Italianist HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Primo Levi’s Anthropological Readings in Scientific American From England to Italy via Paris: Gino Severini and the Sitwells at Montegufoni Writing the ‘Woman Destroyed’ in Elena Ferrante and Simone de Beauvoir Il medium di Buzzati. Spiritismo e meccaniche della paura nel reportage In cerca dell’Italia misteriosa Podcasting the Italian Postcolonial: An Analysis of Black Coffee and S/Confini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1