国防创新与欧盟战略指南针

Q4 Social Sciences Strategic Comments Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1080/13567888.2022.2084242
{"title":"国防创新与欧盟战略指南针","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/13567888.2022.2084242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In March 2022, the European Union adopted a ‘Strategic Compass for Security and Defence’, a joint strategy to strengthen the bloc’s military capabilities by 2030. EU member states have long under-invested in research and development in their defence sectors and have proved less able than competitors such as China and the United States to adapt emerging and disruptive technologies for use in their armed forces. The changes that the Strategic Compass proposes in this area are incremental rather than transformative, which suggests that there is still not a strong European political consensus for increasing the pace of defence innovation.","PeriodicalId":38903,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Comments","volume":" ","pages":"iv - vi"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defence innovation and the European Union’s Strategic Compass\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13567888.2022.2084242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In March 2022, the European Union adopted a ‘Strategic Compass for Security and Defence’, a joint strategy to strengthen the bloc’s military capabilities by 2030. EU member states have long under-invested in research and development in their defence sectors and have proved less able than competitors such as China and the United States to adapt emerging and disruptive technologies for use in their armed forces. The changes that the Strategic Compass proposes in this area are incremental rather than transformative, which suggests that there is still not a strong European political consensus for increasing the pace of defence innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Comments\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"iv - vi\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Comments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2022.2084242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Comments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2022.2084242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年3月,欧盟通过了“安全与防务战略指南”,这是一项到2030年加强欧盟军事能力的联合战略。长期以来,欧盟成员国在国防部门的研发投资不足,事实证明,与中国和美国等竞争对手相比,它们在适应新兴和颠覆性技术用于武装部队方面的能力较弱。《战略指南》在这一领域提出的变革是渐进的,而不是变革性的,这表明欧洲在加快国防创新步伐方面仍然没有达成强有力的政治共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defence innovation and the European Union’s Strategic Compass
In March 2022, the European Union adopted a ‘Strategic Compass for Security and Defence’, a joint strategy to strengthen the bloc’s military capabilities by 2030. EU member states have long under-invested in research and development in their defence sectors and have proved less able than competitors such as China and the United States to adapt emerging and disruptive technologies for use in their armed forces. The changes that the Strategic Compass proposes in this area are incremental rather than transformative, which suggests that there is still not a strong European political consensus for increasing the pace of defence innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Comments
Strategic Comments Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The ANC’s precarious majority ahead of South Africa’s national elections Iraq’s response to the conflict in Gaza The Ethiopia–Somaliland deal The immigration issue for Mexico and the United States The tit-for-tat conflict between Iran and Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1