黑海海洋划界案(罗马尼亚诉乌克兰)。职位调查

Q2 Social Sciences Lex Portus Pub Date : 2019-10-30 DOI:10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3
Iryna Varykasha
{"title":"黑海海洋划界案(罗马尼亚诉乌克兰)。职位调查","authors":"Iryna Varykasha","doi":"10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":36374,"journal":{"name":"Lex Portus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case concerning maritime delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Investigation of positions\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Varykasha\",\"doi\":\"10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Portus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Portus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Portus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我研究了联合国国际法院在各自国家同意的情况下进行的海上划界的材料。这种选择的条件是一个特定的目标,即在他提出适当的国际法论据时,显示国际法院如何解释国际海洋法的合同渊源,如何确定适用的习惯法规范和原则,如何将国际法应用于海上划界,在何种程度上考虑了海洋划界的具体情况下的相关因素。此外,对法院材料的研究提供了查明争端国在海上划界问题上的法律立场以及法院对这种立场的国际法律评价的机会。关键词:黑海划界,国际法,国际法院,海洋边界,罗马尼亚诉乌克兰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Case concerning maritime delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Investigation of positions
In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lex Portus
Lex Portus Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parallel Imports: Striking a Delicate Balance in a Multifaceted Environment Potential Influence of Article 6(1)(b) of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts on Indian Private International Law Ukrainian Supreme Court Judicial Practice in Cases Arising from Disputes between Foreign Shipowners or Protection and Indemnity Clubs, and Seafarers or Seafarers’ Next of Kin India’s Submission to the ITLOS Climate Change Advisory Opinion: A Lost Opportunity Ukraine – China Asymmetric Economic Power Relations: What is to Come after BRI?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1