{"title":"从工程学校到职业:机械工程专业学生职业意向调查","authors":"James N. Magarian, W. Seering","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the variation in career plans among U.S. senior year mechanical engineering undergraduates. The extent to which candidates persist from engineering school into engineering careers attracts attention from hiring managers, educators, and policymakers concerned with the future of the engineering workforce. Prior research has identified patterns of systemic variation in engineering students’ persistence, finding that particular student subsets exhibit lower likelihoods of pursuing conventionally categorized engineering jobs after graduation compared to others. These groups have included students from underrepresented demographics and those with particular key skills profiles. Based on survey data from a sample of 1,061 mechanical engineering seniors across nine universities, we first constructed an occupational sorting model that replicates previously reported relationships between student-specific factors and students’ intentions to work in engineering. We then expanded this model into a new multinomial outcomes model that examines the unique sets of factors associated with specific categories of occupational intentions from an array of engineering and non-engineering options. We find factors such as internship experiences, risk aversion, mathematics enjoyment, strength of professional identity, leadership aspirations, perceptions of creative opportunities, and salary expectations to be significantly associated, in unique combinations, with various types of occupational intentions. We conclude by discussing how knowledge of factors salient to students’ occupational sorting tendencies can help engineering managers refine approaches for recruitment and job formulation, so as to potentially broaden the attractiveness of engineering jobs across the candidate pool and to improve candidate-job matching.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"176 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Engineering School to Careers: An Examination of Occupational Intentions of Mechanical Engineering Students\",\"authors\":\"James N. Magarian, W. Seering\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper examines the variation in career plans among U.S. senior year mechanical engineering undergraduates. The extent to which candidates persist from engineering school into engineering careers attracts attention from hiring managers, educators, and policymakers concerned with the future of the engineering workforce. Prior research has identified patterns of systemic variation in engineering students’ persistence, finding that particular student subsets exhibit lower likelihoods of pursuing conventionally categorized engineering jobs after graduation compared to others. These groups have included students from underrepresented demographics and those with particular key skills profiles. Based on survey data from a sample of 1,061 mechanical engineering seniors across nine universities, we first constructed an occupational sorting model that replicates previously reported relationships between student-specific factors and students’ intentions to work in engineering. We then expanded this model into a new multinomial outcomes model that examines the unique sets of factors associated with specific categories of occupational intentions from an array of engineering and non-engineering options. We find factors such as internship experiences, risk aversion, mathematics enjoyment, strength of professional identity, leadership aspirations, perceptions of creative opportunities, and salary expectations to be significantly associated, in unique combinations, with various types of occupational intentions. We conclude by discussing how knowledge of factors salient to students’ occupational sorting tendencies can help engineering managers refine approaches for recruitment and job formulation, so as to potentially broaden the attractiveness of engineering jobs across the candidate pool and to improve candidate-job matching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"176 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1860414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Engineering School to Careers: An Examination of Occupational Intentions of Mechanical Engineering Students
Abstract This paper examines the variation in career plans among U.S. senior year mechanical engineering undergraduates. The extent to which candidates persist from engineering school into engineering careers attracts attention from hiring managers, educators, and policymakers concerned with the future of the engineering workforce. Prior research has identified patterns of systemic variation in engineering students’ persistence, finding that particular student subsets exhibit lower likelihoods of pursuing conventionally categorized engineering jobs after graduation compared to others. These groups have included students from underrepresented demographics and those with particular key skills profiles. Based on survey data from a sample of 1,061 mechanical engineering seniors across nine universities, we first constructed an occupational sorting model that replicates previously reported relationships between student-specific factors and students’ intentions to work in engineering. We then expanded this model into a new multinomial outcomes model that examines the unique sets of factors associated with specific categories of occupational intentions from an array of engineering and non-engineering options. We find factors such as internship experiences, risk aversion, mathematics enjoyment, strength of professional identity, leadership aspirations, perceptions of creative opportunities, and salary expectations to be significantly associated, in unique combinations, with various types of occupational intentions. We conclude by discussing how knowledge of factors salient to students’ occupational sorting tendencies can help engineering managers refine approaches for recruitment and job formulation, so as to potentially broaden the attractiveness of engineering jobs across the candidate pool and to improve candidate-job matching.
期刊介绍:
EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.