土耳其参与银行和存款银行市场效率的比较分析

IF 0.2 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi Pub Date : 2018-06-27 DOI:10.26650/ISTJECON414809
Erişah Arıcan, A. Çetin
{"title":"土耳其参与银行和存款银行市场效率的比较分析","authors":"Erişah Arıcan, A. Çetin","doi":"10.26650/ISTJECON414809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dissertation analyses the efficiency of the Turkish banking sector by comparing the benefits obtained by deposit banks and participation banks operating from deposits/participation funds and loans (interest or profit rates) using econometric models.  Firstly we comparatively examine average interest rates and profit shares by deposit banks and Islamic banks, respectively, using monthly data for the period January 2005-December 2015 using Monte Carlo Simulation. This analysis reveals that deposit banks paid a 0.49 point higher rate of interest for deposits than the profit rates paid by Islamic banks. This difference is statistically significant at conventional significant levels. Secondly, we compare interest and profit rates for the mortgage loans of  the two groups of banks for the period June 2010-December 2015 using Monte Carlo simulation. We find that conventional banks offered these loans at a rate of 0.92 points lower than Islamic banks. This difference is also statistically significant at conventional significance levels. For the same period we find that, on average, Islamic banks offered commercial loans at a significantly 0.72 basis points lower rate statistically  in comparison to deposit banks. Finally, we compare these groups of banks across return on assets, return on equity and net interest/profit margin using regression analysis for the period January 2005-December 2015. This analysis employs macroeconomic indicators, liquidity indicators, operational expenses, money supply indicators, asset quality indicators as explanatory variables. We find no statistically significant difference in these measures between  the two groups of banks.","PeriodicalId":33072,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Market Efficiency of Participation and Deposit Banks in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Erişah Arıcan, A. Çetin\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/ISTJECON414809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This dissertation analyses the efficiency of the Turkish banking sector by comparing the benefits obtained by deposit banks and participation banks operating from deposits/participation funds and loans (interest or profit rates) using econometric models.  Firstly we comparatively examine average interest rates and profit shares by deposit banks and Islamic banks, respectively, using monthly data for the period January 2005-December 2015 using Monte Carlo Simulation. This analysis reveals that deposit banks paid a 0.49 point higher rate of interest for deposits than the profit rates paid by Islamic banks. This difference is statistically significant at conventional significant levels. Secondly, we compare interest and profit rates for the mortgage loans of  the two groups of banks for the period June 2010-December 2015 using Monte Carlo simulation. We find that conventional banks offered these loans at a rate of 0.92 points lower than Islamic banks. This difference is also statistically significant at conventional significance levels. For the same period we find that, on average, Islamic banks offered commercial loans at a significantly 0.72 basis points lower rate statistically  in comparison to deposit banks. Finally, we compare these groups of banks across return on assets, return on equity and net interest/profit margin using regression analysis for the period January 2005-December 2015. This analysis employs macroeconomic indicators, liquidity indicators, operational expenses, money supply indicators, asset quality indicators as explanatory variables. We find no statistically significant difference in these measures between  the two groups of banks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON414809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON414809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文通过比较存款银行和参与银行从存款/参与基金和贷款(利息或利润率)中获得的收益,使用计量经济学模型,分析了土耳其银行业的效率。首先,我们比较了存款银行和伊斯兰银行的平均利率和利润份额,分别使用2005年1月至2015年12月期间的月度数据,使用蒙特卡洛模拟。分析结果显示,存款银行支付的存款利息比伊斯兰银行支付的利息高出0.49个百分点。这种差异在常规显著水平上具有统计学显著性。其次,我们使用蒙特卡洛模拟比较了2010年6月至2015年12月期间两组银行抵押贷款的利率和利润率。我们发现,传统银行提供这些贷款的利率比伊斯兰银行低0.92个百分点。这种差异在传统显著性水平上也具有统计学意义。在同一时期,我们发现,平均而言,伊斯兰银行提供商业贷款的利率比存款银行低0.72个基点。最后,我们利用2005年1月至2015年12月期间的回归分析,比较了这些银行的资产回报率、股本回报率和净利息/利润率。本分析采用宏观经济指标、流动性指标、运营费用指标、货币供应量指标、资产质量指标作为解释变量。我们发现两组银行在这些指标上没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Analysis of Market Efficiency of Participation and Deposit Banks in Turkey
This dissertation analyses the efficiency of the Turkish banking sector by comparing the benefits obtained by deposit banks and participation banks operating from deposits/participation funds and loans (interest or profit rates) using econometric models.  Firstly we comparatively examine average interest rates and profit shares by deposit banks and Islamic banks, respectively, using monthly data for the period January 2005-December 2015 using Monte Carlo Simulation. This analysis reveals that deposit banks paid a 0.49 point higher rate of interest for deposits than the profit rates paid by Islamic banks. This difference is statistically significant at conventional significant levels. Secondly, we compare interest and profit rates for the mortgage loans of  the two groups of banks for the period June 2010-December 2015 using Monte Carlo simulation. We find that conventional banks offered these loans at a rate of 0.92 points lower than Islamic banks. This difference is also statistically significant at conventional significance levels. For the same period we find that, on average, Islamic banks offered commercial loans at a significantly 0.72 basis points lower rate statistically  in comparison to deposit banks. Finally, we compare these groups of banks across return on assets, return on equity and net interest/profit margin using regression analysis for the period January 2005-December 2015. This analysis employs macroeconomic indicators, liquidity indicators, operational expenses, money supply indicators, asset quality indicators as explanatory variables. We find no statistically significant difference in these measures between  the two groups of banks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historicizing National Socialism and Mehmet Genç Kripto Paraların Volatilite Dinamiklerinin ve Spekülatif Balon Varlığının Analizi: Bitcoin, Ethereum ve Ripple Örneği Sermaye Sahipliği ve Mülkiyetin Tabana Yayılmasının İktisadi Gelir Dağılımına Etkisi* BIST100 Bankacılık Sektöründeki Bağımlılığın Asma Kopula ile İncelenmesi What Determined Stock Returns in Turkey from 1990 to 2022: Evidence from Structural Break Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1