有问题的合法:数字政治和对外宣传

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2021-04-02 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894
Shannon C. McGregor, Bridget Barrett, Daniel Kreiss
{"title":"有问题的合法:数字政治和对外宣传","authors":"Shannon C. McGregor, Bridget Barrett, Daniel Kreiss","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we map the legal work seven U.S. digital consultancies and public relations firms undertook across social media and digital platforms of behalf of four foreign governments. We find these firms used a range of different strategies on social and digital media, very few of which featured legally required disclosures linking the content to their country of origin. Firms targeted journalists and other elites, but exactly how is not clear. Our most powerful findings regard what is absent. Our study reveals as much about the inconsistencies and inadequacies of the current FARA disclosure process and gaps in tech firms’ ad archives as it does about the content and strategies of the messages themselves. We conclude with a series of recommendations for technology firms and the Department of Justice for enforcing FARA regulations as they relate to social and digital content.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"19 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questionably legal: Digital politics and foreign propaganda\",\"authors\":\"Shannon C. McGregor, Bridget Barrett, Daniel Kreiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this study, we map the legal work seven U.S. digital consultancies and public relations firms undertook across social media and digital platforms of behalf of four foreign governments. We find these firms used a range of different strategies on social and digital media, very few of which featured legally required disclosures linking the content to their country of origin. Firms targeted journalists and other elites, but exactly how is not clear. Our most powerful findings regard what is absent. Our study reveals as much about the inconsistencies and inadequacies of the current FARA disclosure process and gaps in tech firms’ ad archives as it does about the content and strategies of the messages themselves. We conclude with a series of recommendations for technology firms and the Department of Justice for enforcing FARA regulations as they relate to social and digital content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1902894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在本研究中,我们绘制了七家美国数字咨询和公共关系公司代表四个外国政府在社交媒体和数字平台上开展的法律工作。我们发现,这些公司在社交和数字媒体上使用了一系列不同的策略,其中很少有法律要求的披露将内容与其来源国联系起来。公司针对的是记者和其他精英,但具体是如何做到的尚不清楚。我们最有力的发现关注的是缺失的东西。我们的研究揭示了当前FARA披露流程的不一致性和不足之处,以及科技公司广告档案中的漏洞,同时也揭示了信息本身的内容和策略。最后,我们向科技公司和司法部提出了一系列建议,以执行与社交和数字内容有关的FARA法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Questionably legal: Digital politics and foreign propaganda
ABSTRACT In this study, we map the legal work seven U.S. digital consultancies and public relations firms undertook across social media and digital platforms of behalf of four foreign governments. We find these firms used a range of different strategies on social and digital media, very few of which featured legally required disclosures linking the content to their country of origin. Firms targeted journalists and other elites, but exactly how is not clear. Our most powerful findings regard what is absent. Our study reveals as much about the inconsistencies and inadequacies of the current FARA disclosure process and gaps in tech firms’ ad archives as it does about the content and strategies of the messages themselves. We conclude with a series of recommendations for technology firms and the Department of Justice for enforcing FARA regulations as they relate to social and digital content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1