{"title":"书评","authors":"J. Moriarty, E. Quah, A. Sparkman","doi":"10.1643/t2022099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin. Joshua M. Kapfer and Donald J. Brown (Eds.). 2022. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9780299335205. xxi þ 1175 p. $74.95 (hardcover).—When Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin arrived, I was surprised by the weight of the box. Upon opening the box, I was looking at the largest single-volume state guide to amphibians and reptiles ever produced. The only larger guide is the three-volume Ohio series (Pfingsten et al., 2013; Davis et al., 2021). This is the first major work on Wisconsin’s herpetofauna since Natural History of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin (Vogt, 1981), and it exceeds the length of that book by more than 900 pages! None of the guides to adjoining states, including Minnesota (Moriarty and Hall, 2014), Illinois (Phillips et al., 2022), Iowa (LeClere, 2013), or Michigan (Holman, 2012), comes close to the breadth and depth of herpetological information covered in this book. Wisconsin is in the Midwest portion of the United States in the Great Lakes region and near the Canadian border. This latitude, and the corresponding climate (long, cold winters), partially explain the relatively low amphibian and reptile diversity (54 species) relative to southern states, where the herpetological species richness can be considerably higher (e.g., the similarly sized state of Georgia has 170 species; Jensen et al., 2008). Kapfer and Brown assembled the knowledge and experience of 52 contributors, including most active herpetologists and conservation biologists in Wisconsin, and several from other states. The contributions ranged from co-authoring one to many species accounts plus natural history notes and introductory chapters. Co-editor Kapfer racked up the most contributions, which might be expected given his long and varied experiences conducting field work in Wisconsin, including his graduate studies. Co-editor Brown took the lead in writing and coordinating the turtle accounts, the reptile group he focused on for his graduate and postdoctoral research. Andrew Badje and Bob Hay stand out among the list of contributors. They have been involved in amphibian and reptile field research and conservation in Wisconsin for many years. Erik Wild produced the excellent, life-like images (colored pencil and pen and ink drawings) for the keys and throughout the book. The book is divided into eight preliminary chapters including: Introduction; Systematics and Classification; Some Prominent Figures in Wisconsin Herpetology; Past, Present, and Potential Future Landscapes of Wisconsin, with Emphasis on Amphibian and Reptile Distributions; Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin Plant Communities; Introduction to Conservation and Management of Wisconsin’s Amphibians and Reptiles; Identification Keys for Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin; and Introduction to Species Accounts. The introductory chapters are well done and provide a good background to the history and habitats of the state. The Systematics and Classification chapter is one not found in most regional guides. This chapter explains how species are related and classified, but the authors do not describe the controversies surrounding the use of scientific names for several groups of amphibians and reptiles. The scientific and common names used in the book follow Crother (2017), but there was no reason given for why this list was used over more recent lists or primary literature. Habitats are described from two perspectives in two chapters, one on ecological provinces and another on plant communities that shows the pre-European and current vegetation, which highlights the major loss of natural communities to agriculture and development (Fig. 11; p. 28). The authors describe how climate and development will alter present and future landscapes, thus affecting the distribution of the state’s herpetofauna. The chapter on plant communities describes 18 communities, the species that use them, and changes in their prevalence on the landscape as a result of human conversion. I found the conservation chapter to be the most important. It is an excellent summary of the concerns, practices, and policies associated with reptiles and amphibians generally, and those in Wisconsin specifically. This level of information is not normally found in a regional work. While the authors do not have answers to all the problems, they do demonstrate the breadth of research being conducted to protect and restore amphibian and reptile populations. The practices described are applicable throughout the Midwest and Great Lakes regions. The keys work well and Wild’s small yet detailed illustrations are a great addition as they highlight distinguishing characteristics. The incorporation of information from previously published keys to produce an inclusive key acknowledges the work of previous herpetologists. Including larval and juvenile forms in the amphibian keys is an excellent addition not found in Vogt (1981) and most regional field guides. A figure comparing the relative adult sizes of all the snakes found in Wisconsin (Fig. 57; p. 132) is a helpful addition. Unfortunately, the measurements are listed in mm when they should be in cm. The figure also does not specify if these are total lengths or SVLs. The species accounts covering 18 amphibians and 36 reptiles comprise the majority of the book (713 pages). Each account starts with a color photograph of the species in nature (or natural setting) and a county-level state map showing vouchered and unvouchered records (similar to the style of Casper, 1996). Plotting these separately will encourage herpetologists to deposit vouchers (specimens or photos) to better characterize their distributions for conservation efforts. The use of county-based maps, vs. detailed dot maps, may help protect species that are subjected to over-collecting or poaching. A North American","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOOK REVIEWS\",\"authors\":\"J. Moriarty, E. Quah, A. Sparkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1643/t2022099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin. Joshua M. Kapfer and Donald J. Brown (Eds.). 2022. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9780299335205. xxi þ 1175 p. $74.95 (hardcover).—When Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin arrived, I was surprised by the weight of the box. Upon opening the box, I was looking at the largest single-volume state guide to amphibians and reptiles ever produced. The only larger guide is the three-volume Ohio series (Pfingsten et al., 2013; Davis et al., 2021). This is the first major work on Wisconsin’s herpetofauna since Natural History of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin (Vogt, 1981), and it exceeds the length of that book by more than 900 pages! None of the guides to adjoining states, including Minnesota (Moriarty and Hall, 2014), Illinois (Phillips et al., 2022), Iowa (LeClere, 2013), or Michigan (Holman, 2012), comes close to the breadth and depth of herpetological information covered in this book. Wisconsin is in the Midwest portion of the United States in the Great Lakes region and near the Canadian border. This latitude, and the corresponding climate (long, cold winters), partially explain the relatively low amphibian and reptile diversity (54 species) relative to southern states, where the herpetological species richness can be considerably higher (e.g., the similarly sized state of Georgia has 170 species; Jensen et al., 2008). Kapfer and Brown assembled the knowledge and experience of 52 contributors, including most active herpetologists and conservation biologists in Wisconsin, and several from other states. The contributions ranged from co-authoring one to many species accounts plus natural history notes and introductory chapters. Co-editor Kapfer racked up the most contributions, which might be expected given his long and varied experiences conducting field work in Wisconsin, including his graduate studies. Co-editor Brown took the lead in writing and coordinating the turtle accounts, the reptile group he focused on for his graduate and postdoctoral research. Andrew Badje and Bob Hay stand out among the list of contributors. They have been involved in amphibian and reptile field research and conservation in Wisconsin for many years. Erik Wild produced the excellent, life-like images (colored pencil and pen and ink drawings) for the keys and throughout the book. The book is divided into eight preliminary chapters including: Introduction; Systematics and Classification; Some Prominent Figures in Wisconsin Herpetology; Past, Present, and Potential Future Landscapes of Wisconsin, with Emphasis on Amphibian and Reptile Distributions; Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin Plant Communities; Introduction to Conservation and Management of Wisconsin’s Amphibians and Reptiles; Identification Keys for Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin; and Introduction to Species Accounts. The introductory chapters are well done and provide a good background to the history and habitats of the state. The Systematics and Classification chapter is one not found in most regional guides. This chapter explains how species are related and classified, but the authors do not describe the controversies surrounding the use of scientific names for several groups of amphibians and reptiles. The scientific and common names used in the book follow Crother (2017), but there was no reason given for why this list was used over more recent lists or primary literature. Habitats are described from two perspectives in two chapters, one on ecological provinces and another on plant communities that shows the pre-European and current vegetation, which highlights the major loss of natural communities to agriculture and development (Fig. 11; p. 28). The authors describe how climate and development will alter present and future landscapes, thus affecting the distribution of the state’s herpetofauna. The chapter on plant communities describes 18 communities, the species that use them, and changes in their prevalence on the landscape as a result of human conversion. I found the conservation chapter to be the most important. It is an excellent summary of the concerns, practices, and policies associated with reptiles and amphibians generally, and those in Wisconsin specifically. This level of information is not normally found in a regional work. While the authors do not have answers to all the problems, they do demonstrate the breadth of research being conducted to protect and restore amphibian and reptile populations. The practices described are applicable throughout the Midwest and Great Lakes regions. The keys work well and Wild’s small yet detailed illustrations are a great addition as they highlight distinguishing characteristics. The incorporation of information from previously published keys to produce an inclusive key acknowledges the work of previous herpetologists. Including larval and juvenile forms in the amphibian keys is an excellent addition not found in Vogt (1981) and most regional field guides. A figure comparing the relative adult sizes of all the snakes found in Wisconsin (Fig. 57; p. 132) is a helpful addition. Unfortunately, the measurements are listed in mm when they should be in cm. The figure also does not specify if these are total lengths or SVLs. The species accounts covering 18 amphibians and 36 reptiles comprise the majority of the book (713 pages). Each account starts with a color photograph of the species in nature (or natural setting) and a county-level state map showing vouchered and unvouchered records (similar to the style of Casper, 1996). Plotting these separately will encourage herpetologists to deposit vouchers (specimens or photos) to better characterize their distributions for conservation efforts. The use of county-based maps, vs. detailed dot maps, may help protect species that are subjected to over-collecting or poaching. A North American\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1643/t2022099\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1643/t2022099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
威斯康星州的两栖动物和爬行动物。乔舒亚M.卡普弗和唐纳德J.布朗(编)。2022. 威斯康星大学出版社。ISBN 9780299335205。Xxi + 1175 p. 74.95美元(精装)。当威斯康辛州的两栖和爬行动物协会到达时,我被箱子的重量吓了一跳。打开盒子,我看到的是有史以来最大的单卷两栖动物和爬行动物州指南。唯一较大的指南是三卷本的Ohio系列(Pfingsten et al., 2013;Davis等人,2021)。这是自《威斯康辛州两栖动物和爬行动物自然史》(Vogt, 1981)以来第一部关于威斯康辛州爬行动物的主要著作,它比那本书多出900多页!包括明尼苏达州(Moriarty and Hall, 2014)、伊利诺伊州(Phillips et al., 2022)、爱荷华州(LeClere, 2013)或密歇根州(Holman, 2012)在内的毗邻州的指南,都没有接近本书所涵盖的爬虫学信息的广度和深度。威斯康星州位于美国中西部的五大湖地区,靠近加拿大边境。这个纬度和相应的气候(漫长而寒冷的冬季)部分解释了与南方各州相比,两栖动物和爬行动物的多样性相对较低(54种),而南方各州的爬行动物物种丰富度可能相当高(例如,面积相似的乔治亚州有170种;Jensen et al., 2008)。卡普弗和布朗汇集了52位贡献者的知识和经验,其中包括威斯康星州最活跃的爬虫学家和保护生物学家,以及来自其他州的几位。贡献范围从共同撰写一个到多个物种,加上自然历史笔记和介绍性章节。联合编辑卡普弗尔贡献最多,考虑到他在威斯康辛州长期从事各种实地工作的经历,包括他的研究生学习,这是意料之中的。共同编辑布朗带头撰写和协调了海龟的账目,他的研究生和博士后研究重点是爬行动物群体。Andrew Badje和Bob Hay在贡献者名单中脱颖而出。他们多年来一直在威斯康星州从事两栖动物和爬行动物的实地研究和保护工作。埃里克·怀尔德为钥匙和整本书制作了出色的、栩栩如生的图像(彩色铅笔、钢笔和水墨画)。全书分为八个初步章节,包括:绪论;系统分类;威斯康星州爬行动物学界的一些杰出人物威斯康星州过去、现在和潜在的未来景观,重点是两栖动物和爬行动物的分布威斯康星州植物群落中的两栖动物和爬行动物威斯康星州两栖动物和爬行动物保护与管理概论威斯康星州两栖动物和爬行动物的识别键《物种概论》。导论章节做得很好,为国家的历史和栖息地提供了很好的背景。系统分类一章是在大多数地区指南中找不到的。这一章解释了物种是如何关联和分类的,但作者没有描述围绕几个两栖动物和爬行动物群体使用学名的争议。书中使用的科学和常用名称遵循克罗瑟(2017),但没有给出为什么这个列表被使用在最近的列表或原始文献上的原因。栖息地在两章中从两个角度进行了描述,一个是关于生态省,另一个是关于植物群落,显示了欧洲前和现在的植被,突出了自然群落因农业和发展而遭受的主要损失(图11;28页)。作者描述了气候和发展将如何改变现在和未来的景观,从而影响该州爬行动物的分布。植物群落这一章描述了18个群落,利用它们的物种,以及由于人类的转换,它们在景观上的流行程度的变化。我发现保护章节是最重要的。它是对爬行动物和两栖动物的关注、实践和政策的一个很好的总结,特别是在威斯康星州。这种程度的信息在区域性著作中通常是找不到的。虽然作者并不能回答所有的问题,但他们确实展示了为保护和恢复两栖动物和爬行动物种群而进行的广泛研究。所描述的做法适用于整个中西部和五大湖地区。钥匙很好用,Wild的小而详细的插图是一个很好的补充,因为它们突出了不同的特征。将先前发布的密钥信息整合到一个包含密钥中,是对先前爬虫学家的工作的认可。在两栖动物键中包括幼虫和幼崽是Vogt(1981)和大多数地区野外指南中没有发现的一个很好的补充。 比较威斯康星州发现的所有蛇的相对成年尺寸的图(图57;第132页)是一个有益的补充。不幸的是,测量值应该以厘米为单位,但却以毫米为单位。该图也没有指定这些是总长度还是svl。这本书(713页)的主要内容是18种两栖动物和36种爬行动物。每一份报告都以一张物种在自然界(或自然环境中)的彩色照片和一张县级州地图开始,地图上显示了有担保和无担保的记录(类似于卡斯珀1996年的风格)。将它们分开绘制,将鼓励爬虫学家保存凭证(标本或照片),以便更好地描述它们的分布,以进行保护工作。使用以国家为基础的地图,而不是详细的点图,可能有助于保护那些遭受过度采集或偷猎的物种。北美人
Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin. Joshua M. Kapfer and Donald J. Brown (Eds.). 2022. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9780299335205. xxi þ 1175 p. $74.95 (hardcover).—When Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin arrived, I was surprised by the weight of the box. Upon opening the box, I was looking at the largest single-volume state guide to amphibians and reptiles ever produced. The only larger guide is the three-volume Ohio series (Pfingsten et al., 2013; Davis et al., 2021). This is the first major work on Wisconsin’s herpetofauna since Natural History of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin (Vogt, 1981), and it exceeds the length of that book by more than 900 pages! None of the guides to adjoining states, including Minnesota (Moriarty and Hall, 2014), Illinois (Phillips et al., 2022), Iowa (LeClere, 2013), or Michigan (Holman, 2012), comes close to the breadth and depth of herpetological information covered in this book. Wisconsin is in the Midwest portion of the United States in the Great Lakes region and near the Canadian border. This latitude, and the corresponding climate (long, cold winters), partially explain the relatively low amphibian and reptile diversity (54 species) relative to southern states, where the herpetological species richness can be considerably higher (e.g., the similarly sized state of Georgia has 170 species; Jensen et al., 2008). Kapfer and Brown assembled the knowledge and experience of 52 contributors, including most active herpetologists and conservation biologists in Wisconsin, and several from other states. The contributions ranged from co-authoring one to many species accounts plus natural history notes and introductory chapters. Co-editor Kapfer racked up the most contributions, which might be expected given his long and varied experiences conducting field work in Wisconsin, including his graduate studies. Co-editor Brown took the lead in writing and coordinating the turtle accounts, the reptile group he focused on for his graduate and postdoctoral research. Andrew Badje and Bob Hay stand out among the list of contributors. They have been involved in amphibian and reptile field research and conservation in Wisconsin for many years. Erik Wild produced the excellent, life-like images (colored pencil and pen and ink drawings) for the keys and throughout the book. The book is divided into eight preliminary chapters including: Introduction; Systematics and Classification; Some Prominent Figures in Wisconsin Herpetology; Past, Present, and Potential Future Landscapes of Wisconsin, with Emphasis on Amphibian and Reptile Distributions; Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin Plant Communities; Introduction to Conservation and Management of Wisconsin’s Amphibians and Reptiles; Identification Keys for Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin; and Introduction to Species Accounts. The introductory chapters are well done and provide a good background to the history and habitats of the state. The Systematics and Classification chapter is one not found in most regional guides. This chapter explains how species are related and classified, but the authors do not describe the controversies surrounding the use of scientific names for several groups of amphibians and reptiles. The scientific and common names used in the book follow Crother (2017), but there was no reason given for why this list was used over more recent lists or primary literature. Habitats are described from two perspectives in two chapters, one on ecological provinces and another on plant communities that shows the pre-European and current vegetation, which highlights the major loss of natural communities to agriculture and development (Fig. 11; p. 28). The authors describe how climate and development will alter present and future landscapes, thus affecting the distribution of the state’s herpetofauna. The chapter on plant communities describes 18 communities, the species that use them, and changes in their prevalence on the landscape as a result of human conversion. I found the conservation chapter to be the most important. It is an excellent summary of the concerns, practices, and policies associated with reptiles and amphibians generally, and those in Wisconsin specifically. This level of information is not normally found in a regional work. While the authors do not have answers to all the problems, they do demonstrate the breadth of research being conducted to protect and restore amphibian and reptile populations. The practices described are applicable throughout the Midwest and Great Lakes regions. The keys work well and Wild’s small yet detailed illustrations are a great addition as they highlight distinguishing characteristics. The incorporation of information from previously published keys to produce an inclusive key acknowledges the work of previous herpetologists. Including larval and juvenile forms in the amphibian keys is an excellent addition not found in Vogt (1981) and most regional field guides. A figure comparing the relative adult sizes of all the snakes found in Wisconsin (Fig. 57; p. 132) is a helpful addition. Unfortunately, the measurements are listed in mm when they should be in cm. The figure also does not specify if these are total lengths or SVLs. The species accounts covering 18 amphibians and 36 reptiles comprise the majority of the book (713 pages). Each account starts with a color photograph of the species in nature (or natural setting) and a county-level state map showing vouchered and unvouchered records (similar to the style of Casper, 1996). Plotting these separately will encourage herpetologists to deposit vouchers (specimens or photos) to better characterize their distributions for conservation efforts. The use of county-based maps, vs. detailed dot maps, may help protect species that are subjected to over-collecting or poaching. A North American
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.