基于残差分析的能力测试方案解释新方法

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Accreditation and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s00769-022-01522-x
Luiz Henrique da Conceição Leal, Fernando Gustavo Marques Violante, Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho, Bruno Carius Garrido, Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego, Gabriel Fonseca Sarmanho, Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha
{"title":"基于残差分析的能力测试方案解释新方法","authors":"Luiz Henrique da Conceição Leal,&nbsp;Fernando Gustavo Marques Violante,&nbsp;Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho,&nbsp;Bruno Carius Garrido,&nbsp;Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego,&nbsp;Gabriel Fonseca Sarmanho,&nbsp;Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha","doi":"10.1007/s00769-022-01522-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proficiency testing schemes by interlaboratory comparisons are used to determine the performance of individual laboratories for specific tests or measurements. The international standard ISO 13528:2015 provides a description of statistical methods used for achieving this goal; one of these methods is the <i>z</i> score. The standard allows each participant to choose a measurement method and this can lead to inhomogeneity between participant variance known as heteroscedasticity. The ISO 13528:2015 standard does not mention heteroscedasticity in its statistical procedures. This paper describes a new approach, based on residuals analysis, to assess the performance of an interlaboratory comparison for determining the presence of benzoic acid in orange juice. The results indicate that the conclusions (using <i>z</i> scores) and the proposed approach are different for some laboratories. This occurs due to violation of the homoscedasticity assumption. The <i>z</i> score procedure does not consider this assumption violation while residual analysis can provide such information. Feasible generalized least squares allow one to deal with non-homoscedasticity.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"27 6","pages":"349 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new methodology for proficiency testing scheme interpretation based on residual analysis\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Henrique da Conceição Leal,&nbsp;Fernando Gustavo Marques Violante,&nbsp;Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho,&nbsp;Bruno Carius Garrido,&nbsp;Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego,&nbsp;Gabriel Fonseca Sarmanho,&nbsp;Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-022-01522-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proficiency testing schemes by interlaboratory comparisons are used to determine the performance of individual laboratories for specific tests or measurements. The international standard ISO 13528:2015 provides a description of statistical methods used for achieving this goal; one of these methods is the <i>z</i> score. The standard allows each participant to choose a measurement method and this can lead to inhomogeneity between participant variance known as heteroscedasticity. The ISO 13528:2015 standard does not mention heteroscedasticity in its statistical procedures. This paper describes a new approach, based on residuals analysis, to assess the performance of an interlaboratory comparison for determining the presence of benzoic acid in orange juice. The results indicate that the conclusions (using <i>z</i> scores) and the proposed approach are different for some laboratories. This occurs due to violation of the homoscedasticity assumption. The <i>z</i> score procedure does not consider this assumption violation while residual analysis can provide such information. Feasible generalized least squares allow one to deal with non-homoscedasticity.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"349 - 357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-022-01522-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-022-01522-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过实验室间比较的能力测试方案用于确定个别实验室在特定测试或测量方面的表现。国际标准ISO 13528:2015提供了用于实现这一目标的统计方法的描述;其中一种方法是z分数。该标准允许每个参与者选择一种测量方法,这可能导致参与者方差之间的不均匀性,称为异方差。ISO 13528:2015标准在其统计程序中没有提到异方差。本文描述了一种基于残差分析的新方法,以评估实验室间比较确定橙汁中苯甲酸存在的性能。结果表明,结论(使用z分数)和提出的方法在某些实验室是不同的。这是由于违反了同方差假设。z分数过程不考虑这种假设违反,而残差分析可以提供这样的信息。可行广义最小二乘允许处理非同方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new methodology for proficiency testing scheme interpretation based on residual analysis

Proficiency testing schemes by interlaboratory comparisons are used to determine the performance of individual laboratories for specific tests or measurements. The international standard ISO 13528:2015 provides a description of statistical methods used for achieving this goal; one of these methods is the z score. The standard allows each participant to choose a measurement method and this can lead to inhomogeneity between participant variance known as heteroscedasticity. The ISO 13528:2015 standard does not mention heteroscedasticity in its statistical procedures. This paper describes a new approach, based on residuals analysis, to assess the performance of an interlaboratory comparison for determining the presence of benzoic acid in orange juice. The results indicate that the conclusions (using z scores) and the proposed approach are different for some laboratories. This occurs due to violation of the homoscedasticity assumption. The z score procedure does not consider this assumption violation while residual analysis can provide such information. Feasible generalized least squares allow one to deal with non-homoscedasticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Certification of the total element mass fractions in UME EnvCRM 03 soil sample via a joint research project Association between blood lead levels and socio-demographic factors among outpatient children in Ningbo, China Proficiency tests for analysis of pesticide residues in kimchi cabbage and ginseng in South Korea from 2008 to 2020 Points to consider when establishing an equipment calibration programme in a conventional food microbiology laboratory for ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation purpose Approaches for the production of reference materials with qualitative properties—The new International Standard ISO 33406
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1