人民的艺术与文化记忆:拉丁美洲与大洋洲的批判性对话

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/13260219.2021.1994703
Vanine Borges Amaral
{"title":"人民的艺术与文化记忆:拉丁美洲与大洋洲的批判性对话","authors":"Vanine Borges Amaral","doi":"10.1080/13260219.2021.1994703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Several theoretical positions such as the “Global South” have challenged the developmentalist logic that continues to maintain cultural categorizations as they relate to art in the aftermath of WWII. In the current neoliberal era, the post-1945 developmentalist paradigm has gone even further by instrumentalizing culture itself produced under “conditions of oppression,” primarily to foster public diplomacy and economic benefits. Nation-states face globalization using these categories in order to create an authentic and competitive identity. This article engages in a cross-cultural analysis of arte popular brasileira—in which Brazil belongs to the Global South—and Māori art—in what I call the “southern isles” of Aotearoa New Zealand—both of which function in conditions of coloniality. I identify the implications of the strategies implemented in governmental policies and official institutional spaces for these artistic and cultural expressions.","PeriodicalId":41881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peoples’ Art and Cultural Memory: A Critical Dialogue between Latin America and Oceania\",\"authors\":\"Vanine Borges Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13260219.2021.1994703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Several theoretical positions such as the “Global South” have challenged the developmentalist logic that continues to maintain cultural categorizations as they relate to art in the aftermath of WWII. In the current neoliberal era, the post-1945 developmentalist paradigm has gone even further by instrumentalizing culture itself produced under “conditions of oppression,” primarily to foster public diplomacy and economic benefits. Nation-states face globalization using these categories in order to create an authentic and competitive identity. This article engages in a cross-cultural analysis of arte popular brasileira—in which Brazil belongs to the Global South—and Māori art—in what I call the “southern isles” of Aotearoa New Zealand—both of which function in conditions of coloniality. I identify the implications of the strategies implemented in governmental policies and official institutional spaces for these artistic and cultural expressions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2021.1994703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2021.1994703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“全球南方”等一些理论立场挑战了发展主义逻辑,这种逻辑在二战后继续保持着与艺术相关的文化分类。在当前的新自由主义时代,1945年后的发展主义范式更进一步,将“压迫条件”下产生的文化本身工具化,主要是为了促进公共外交和经济利益。民族国家利用这些类别来面对全球化,以创造真实和有竞争力的身份。本文对流行的巴西艺术(巴西属于全球南方)和毛利艺术(我称之为新西兰奥特亚的“南方岛屿”)进行了跨文化分析,这两种艺术都在殖民地条件下发挥作用。我确定了政府政策和官方机构空间中实施的战略对这些艺术和文化表达的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peoples’ Art and Cultural Memory: A Critical Dialogue between Latin America and Oceania
ABSTRACT Several theoretical positions such as the “Global South” have challenged the developmentalist logic that continues to maintain cultural categorizations as they relate to art in the aftermath of WWII. In the current neoliberal era, the post-1945 developmentalist paradigm has gone even further by instrumentalizing culture itself produced under “conditions of oppression,” primarily to foster public diplomacy and economic benefits. Nation-states face globalization using these categories in order to create an authentic and competitive identity. This article engages in a cross-cultural analysis of arte popular brasileira—in which Brazil belongs to the Global South—and Māori art—in what I call the “southern isles” of Aotearoa New Zealand—both of which function in conditions of coloniality. I identify the implications of the strategies implemented in governmental policies and official institutional spaces for these artistic and cultural expressions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
ABC of a Tragedy: Governance, the Rule of Law and the Failed Implementation of Early Childhood Education in Mexico Specters in the Paraguayan Woods: The Grammar of Secrecy in Hugo Giménez’s Matar a un muerto (2019) The Blind President and a Political Drama in Argentina’s Interwar Politics: The Case of Roberto M. Ortiz and His Attempt at Democratic Redemption The Quest for Visibility and Legibility: Quantifying the Indigenous Population in Brazil in the Late Twentieth Century Legacies of War: Violence, Ecologies, and Kin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1