{"title":"Discoid和Levallois支持工具生产的技术功能含义","authors":"D. Delpiano, Jacopo Gennai, M. Peresani","doi":"10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The technological dichotomy between Discoid and Levallois methods, which accompanies the Mousterian assemblages for most of the Middle Paleolithic, is a debated topic because of the implications for Neanderthals’ behavioral complexity. We here propose and discuss the possible reasons supporting the Levallois-Discoid shift, considering part of the late Mousterian sequence of Grotta di Fumane. Among these, we include the strategies of resource exploitation and territorial mobility, and the productivity and effectiveness rates between the two methods. Though both highlighting differences, these cannot justify a sharp change in production strategies. Looking specifically at the technological objectives, we compared a category of common products: the backed artefacts. This category includes similar tools, but morpho-functional differences suggest different degrees of efficiency. The comparison helped to better define the Discoid and Levallois technologies in their functional and potential objectives, whose variations may have influenced the alternating pattern in the technological choices here recorded.","PeriodicalId":45597,"journal":{"name":"Lithic Technology","volume":"46 1","pages":"171 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Functional Implication on the Production of Discoid and Levallois Backed Implements\",\"authors\":\"D. Delpiano, Jacopo Gennai, M. Peresani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The technological dichotomy between Discoid and Levallois methods, which accompanies the Mousterian assemblages for most of the Middle Paleolithic, is a debated topic because of the implications for Neanderthals’ behavioral complexity. We here propose and discuss the possible reasons supporting the Levallois-Discoid shift, considering part of the late Mousterian sequence of Grotta di Fumane. Among these, we include the strategies of resource exploitation and territorial mobility, and the productivity and effectiveness rates between the two methods. Though both highlighting differences, these cannot justify a sharp change in production strategies. Looking specifically at the technological objectives, we compared a category of common products: the backed artefacts. This category includes similar tools, but morpho-functional differences suggest different degrees of efficiency. The comparison helped to better define the Discoid and Levallois technologies in their functional and potential objectives, whose variations may have influenced the alternating pattern in the technological choices here recorded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithic Technology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
摘要Discoid和Levallois方法之间的技术二分法伴随着旧石器时代中期的Mousterian组合,由于其对尼安德特人行为复杂性的影响,一直是一个有争议的话题。考虑到Grotta di Fumane的Mousterian晚期序列的一部分,我们在这里提出并讨论了支持Levallois Discoid转变的可能原因。其中,我们包括资源开发和领土流动的战略,以及这两种方法之间的生产率和有效率。尽管两者都突出了差异,但这并不能证明大幅改变生产策略是合理的。具体来看技术目标,我们比较了一类常见产品:背衬工艺品。这一类别包括类似的工具,但形态和功能的差异表明效率不同。这一比较有助于更好地定义Discoid和Levallois技术的功能和潜在目标,它们的变化可能影响了这里记录的技术选择的交替模式。
Techno-Functional Implication on the Production of Discoid and Levallois Backed Implements
ABSTRACT The technological dichotomy between Discoid and Levallois methods, which accompanies the Mousterian assemblages for most of the Middle Paleolithic, is a debated topic because of the implications for Neanderthals’ behavioral complexity. We here propose and discuss the possible reasons supporting the Levallois-Discoid shift, considering part of the late Mousterian sequence of Grotta di Fumane. Among these, we include the strategies of resource exploitation and territorial mobility, and the productivity and effectiveness rates between the two methods. Though both highlighting differences, these cannot justify a sharp change in production strategies. Looking specifically at the technological objectives, we compared a category of common products: the backed artefacts. This category includes similar tools, but morpho-functional differences suggest different degrees of efficiency. The comparison helped to better define the Discoid and Levallois technologies in their functional and potential objectives, whose variations may have influenced the alternating pattern in the technological choices here recorded.