手术切除脑转移瘤的术中放疗:局部控制和剂量分析。

Christopher P. Cifarelli, J. Vargo, Joshua D. Hack, P. Renz, L. Poplawski, G. Jacobson, K. Kahl, S. Brehmer, G. Sarria, F. Giordano
{"title":"手术切除脑转移瘤的术中放疗:局部控制和剂量分析。","authors":"Christopher P. Cifarelli, J. Vargo, Joshua D. Hack, P. Renz, L. Poplawski, G. Jacobson, K. Kahl, S. Brehmer, G. Sarria, F. Giordano","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"114 Background: The optimal use of adjuvant radiation following surgical resection of large brain metastases (BM) remains undetermined. Time to initiation following surgery and target delineation both impact local control (LC). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) allows for elimination of lag time between surgery and radiation, direct cavity targeting, and safe dose escalation beyond traditional stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The current study provides an analysis of local disease control and dosimetric parameters related to intracranial IORT. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with the Zeiss Intrabeam device (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Germany) using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0cm with 50kV output. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM) with endpoints of LC and incidence of RN, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Dosimetric comparisons between IORT and SRS were made based on V10, V12, and dose homogeneity based on percent of GTV receiving greater than 20Gy or 30Gy. Results: 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC rate was 88% with radiation necrosis (RN) present in 4 patients (7%). The dosimetric comparison of a single IORT case revealed non-target V10 and V12 volumes as 24.75cm3 and 14.76cm3, respectively, for the SRS treatment plan of 16Gy to the margin. The V10 and V12 for the IORT treatment plan were 20.83cm3 and 9.93cm3 with a surface dose of 30Gy. The volumes exceeding 20Gy and 30Gy in the SRS plan were 14.73cm3 and 0.328cm3, respectively, while the corresponding volumes in the IORT plan were 9.8cm3 and 0cm3. Conclusions: IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with a high rate of LC, low incidence of RN, increased homogeneity of target dose and ability to escalate dose beyond traditional SRS plans.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for surgically resected brain metastases: Local control and dosimetric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P. Cifarelli, J. Vargo, Joshua D. Hack, P. Renz, L. Poplawski, G. Jacobson, K. Kahl, S. Brehmer, G. Sarria, F. Giordano\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"114 Background: The optimal use of adjuvant radiation following surgical resection of large brain metastases (BM) remains undetermined. Time to initiation following surgery and target delineation both impact local control (LC). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) allows for elimination of lag time between surgery and radiation, direct cavity targeting, and safe dose escalation beyond traditional stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The current study provides an analysis of local disease control and dosimetric parameters related to intracranial IORT. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with the Zeiss Intrabeam device (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Germany) using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0cm with 50kV output. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM) with endpoints of LC and incidence of RN, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Dosimetric comparisons between IORT and SRS were made based on V10, V12, and dose homogeneity based on percent of GTV receiving greater than 20Gy or 30Gy. Results: 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC rate was 88% with radiation necrosis (RN) present in 4 patients (7%). The dosimetric comparison of a single IORT case revealed non-target V10 and V12 volumes as 24.75cm3 and 14.76cm3, respectively, for the SRS treatment plan of 16Gy to the margin. The V10 and V12 for the IORT treatment plan were 20.83cm3 and 9.93cm3 with a surface dose of 30Gy. The volumes exceeding 20Gy and 30Gy in the SRS plan were 14.73cm3 and 0.328cm3, respectively, while the corresponding volumes in the IORT plan were 9.8cm3 and 0cm3. Conclusions: IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with a high rate of LC, low incidence of RN, increased homogeneity of target dose and ability to escalate dose beyond traditional SRS plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

114背景:大面积脑转移瘤(BM)手术切除后辅助放射的最佳使用尚不确定。手术后的起始时间和靶点划定都会影响局部控制(LC)。术中放疗(IORT)可以消除手术和放疗之间的滞后时间,直接腔靶向,并在传统的立体定向放射外科(SRS)之外安全地增加剂量。目前的研究提供了与颅内IORT相关的局部疾病控制和剂量测定参数的分析。方法:根据个别IRB的批准,在三个机构收集BMs手术切除后立即接受IORT治疗的患者的回顾性数据。所有患者均使用蔡司Intrabem设备(德国卡尔蔡司Meditech)进行治疗,使用1.5至4.0cm的球形施加器,输出50kV。使用SPSS(IBM)对LC终点和RN发生率进行统计分析,p<0.05被认为是显著的。IORT和SRS之间的剂量测定比较基于V10、V12,剂量均匀性基于GTV接收大于20Gy或30Gy的百分比。结果:54例患者接受IORT治疗,中位年龄64岁。最常见的原发诊断是非小细胞肺癌癌症(40%),最常见的位置在额叶(38%)。中位随访时间为7.2个月,1年LC发生率为88%,4名患者(7%)出现放射性坏死(RN)。单个IORT病例的剂量测定比较显示,对于16Gy至边缘的SRS治疗计划,非目标V10和V12体积分别为24.75cm3和14.76cm3。IORT治疗方案的V10和V12分别为20.83cm3和9.93cm3,表面剂量为30Gy。SRS计划中超过20Gy和30Gy的体积分别为14.73立方厘米和0.328立方厘米,而IORT计划中的相应体积分别为9.8立方厘米和0立方厘米。结论:IORT是一种安全有效的向BM切除腔提供辅助辐射的方法,具有LC发生率高、RN发生率低、靶剂量均匀性增加以及将剂量增加到传统SRS计划之外的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for surgically resected brain metastases: Local control and dosimetric analysis.
114 Background: The optimal use of adjuvant radiation following surgical resection of large brain metastases (BM) remains undetermined. Time to initiation following surgery and target delineation both impact local control (LC). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) allows for elimination of lag time between surgery and radiation, direct cavity targeting, and safe dose escalation beyond traditional stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The current study provides an analysis of local disease control and dosimetric parameters related to intracranial IORT. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with the Zeiss Intrabeam device (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Germany) using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0cm with 50kV output. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM) with endpoints of LC and incidence of RN, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Dosimetric comparisons between IORT and SRS were made based on V10, V12, and dose homogeneity based on percent of GTV receiving greater than 20Gy or 30Gy. Results: 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC rate was 88% with radiation necrosis (RN) present in 4 patients (7%). The dosimetric comparison of a single IORT case revealed non-target V10 and V12 volumes as 24.75cm3 and 14.76cm3, respectively, for the SRS treatment plan of 16Gy to the margin. The V10 and V12 for the IORT treatment plan were 20.83cm3 and 9.93cm3 with a surface dose of 30Gy. The volumes exceeding 20Gy and 30Gy in the SRS plan were 14.73cm3 and 0.328cm3, respectively, while the corresponding volumes in the IORT plan were 9.8cm3 and 0cm3. Conclusions: IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with a high rate of LC, low incidence of RN, increased homogeneity of target dose and ability to escalate dose beyond traditional SRS plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Expanding Coverage of Oncology Drugs in an Aging, Upper-Middle-Income Country: Analyses of Public and Private Expenditures in Chile. Patterns of Care of Cancers and Radiotherapy in Ethiopia. Identifying and Prioritizing Family Education Needs at Pediatric Oncology Centers in Central America and Mexico. Does Interim PET Scan After 2 Cycles of ABVD Predict Outcome in Hodgkin Lymphoma? Real-World Evidence. Pattern of Presentation of Patients With Breast Cancer in Iraq in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1