胆道引流方式对肝门恶性梗阻患者细菌性胆管发生的影响

Y. Susak
{"title":"胆道引流方式对肝门恶性梗阻患者细菌性胆管发生的影响","authors":"Y. Susak","doi":"10.15407/biotech15.04.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was comparative assessment of the frequency of bacterial colonization of the bile in patients with hilar malignant biliary obstruction after the palliative biliary decompression using different methodological approaches. Methods. 50 patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin aged of ~ 62 years (25 males and 25 females), who were on steady-state treatment in Main military clinical hospital (Kyiv, Ukraine) were recruited in this prospective study. All patients underwent cholangiostomy using percutaneous transhepatic (PTBD) and external-internal suprapapillary (EISBD) approaches. Bile specimens were taken right after the biliary drainage. Identification of bacterial isolates was performed using standard cultural and biochemical methods. Results. The incidence of cholangitis was almost twice lower in EISBD group (n=26) than in PTBD group (n=24): 25.6% vs 49.1%. The rates of bacteriobilia did not differ significantly in patients from different groups: 23.1% in EISBD group and 25.0% in PTBD group. However, the frequency of biliary bacterial colonization coupled with cholangitis was also 2 times lower in EISBD group in comparison with patients underwent PTBD: 7.7% vs 16.7%. Escherichia coli predominated in bile specimens from patients with bacteriobilia associated with cholangitis in both groups. Conclusions. The use of EISBD for palliative biliary decompression in patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin is associated with lower risk of bacterial colonization of the bile as compared to PTBD approach, and as a result with less risk of the development of infectious complications","PeriodicalId":9267,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnologia Acta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF BILIARY DRAINAGE MODE ON BACTERIOBILIA OCCURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH HILAR MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTION\",\"authors\":\"Y. Susak\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/biotech15.04.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was comparative assessment of the frequency of bacterial colonization of the bile in patients with hilar malignant biliary obstruction after the palliative biliary decompression using different methodological approaches. Methods. 50 patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin aged of ~ 62 years (25 males and 25 females), who were on steady-state treatment in Main military clinical hospital (Kyiv, Ukraine) were recruited in this prospective study. All patients underwent cholangiostomy using percutaneous transhepatic (PTBD) and external-internal suprapapillary (EISBD) approaches. Bile specimens were taken right after the biliary drainage. Identification of bacterial isolates was performed using standard cultural and biochemical methods. Results. The incidence of cholangitis was almost twice lower in EISBD group (n=26) than in PTBD group (n=24): 25.6% vs 49.1%. The rates of bacteriobilia did not differ significantly in patients from different groups: 23.1% in EISBD group and 25.0% in PTBD group. However, the frequency of biliary bacterial colonization coupled with cholangitis was also 2 times lower in EISBD group in comparison with patients underwent PTBD: 7.7% vs 16.7%. Escherichia coli predominated in bile specimens from patients with bacteriobilia associated with cholangitis in both groups. Conclusions. The use of EISBD for palliative biliary decompression in patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin is associated with lower risk of bacterial colonization of the bile as compared to PTBD approach, and as a result with less risk of the development of infectious complications\",\"PeriodicalId\":9267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnologia Acta\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnologia Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech15.04.044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnologia Acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech15.04.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较评估采用不同方法进行姑息性胆道减压后肝门恶性胆道梗阻患者胆汁细菌定植的频率。方法。本前瞻性研究招募了50名肿瘤源性近端机械性黄疸患者(25男25女),他们在主要军事临床医院(乌克兰基辅)接受稳态治疗。所有患者均采用经皮肝穿刺(PTBD)和内外乳头上(EISBD)入路进行胆管造口术。胆汁标本在胆道引流后立即采集。使用标准培养和生化方法对细菌分离株进行鉴定。后果EISBD组(n=26)的胆管炎发病率几乎是PTBD组(n=24)的两倍:25.6%对49.1%。不同组患者的胆汁感染率没有显著差异:EISBD和PTBD分别为23.1%和25.0%。然而,与接受PTBD的患者相比,EISBD组的胆道细菌定植合并胆管炎的频率也低了2倍:7.7%vs 16.7%。在两组中,与胆管炎相关的胆道细菌患者的胆汁标本中,大肠杆菌占主导地位。结论。与PTBD方法相比,在肿瘤源性近端机械性黄疸患者中使用EISBD进行姑息性胆汁减压与胆汁细菌定植的风险较低有关,因此发生感染性并发症的风险较小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE IMPACT OF BILIARY DRAINAGE MODE ON BACTERIOBILIA OCCURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH HILAR MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTION
The purpose of this study was comparative assessment of the frequency of bacterial colonization of the bile in patients with hilar malignant biliary obstruction after the palliative biliary decompression using different methodological approaches. Methods. 50 patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin aged of ~ 62 years (25 males and 25 females), who were on steady-state treatment in Main military clinical hospital (Kyiv, Ukraine) were recruited in this prospective study. All patients underwent cholangiostomy using percutaneous transhepatic (PTBD) and external-internal suprapapillary (EISBD) approaches. Bile specimens were taken right after the biliary drainage. Identification of bacterial isolates was performed using standard cultural and biochemical methods. Results. The incidence of cholangitis was almost twice lower in EISBD group (n=26) than in PTBD group (n=24): 25.6% vs 49.1%. The rates of bacteriobilia did not differ significantly in patients from different groups: 23.1% in EISBD group and 25.0% in PTBD group. However, the frequency of biliary bacterial colonization coupled with cholangitis was also 2 times lower in EISBD group in comparison with patients underwent PTBD: 7.7% vs 16.7%. Escherichia coli predominated in bile specimens from patients with bacteriobilia associated with cholangitis in both groups. Conclusions. The use of EISBD for palliative biliary decompression in patients with proximal mechanical jaundice of tumor origin is associated with lower risk of bacterial colonization of the bile as compared to PTBD approach, and as a result with less risk of the development of infectious complications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
BIOMEDICAL APPLICATION OF K5 PLASMINOGEN FRAGMENT COMPLEXATION OF CURCUMIN WITH BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN AND DIPHTHERIA TOXOID CRM197 MECHANISMS OF ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF FLAVONOIDS INFLUENCE OF BIOLOGICAL INDUCTORS ON THE SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF MICROBIAL METABOLITES DYNAMICS OF THE PHENOLIC CONSTITUENTS AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY IN SUBMERGED CULTURES OF Xylaria SPECIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1