从公会到社会:重新审视海牙画院的基础

Q2 Arts and Humanities Early Modern Low Countries Pub Date : 2019-06-24 DOI:10.18352/EMLC.92
P. Bakker
{"title":"从公会到社会:重新审视海牙画院的基础","authors":"P. Bakker","doi":"10.18352/EMLC.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The foundation of the Confrerie Pictura (an artistic brotherhood) in The Hague has given rise to controversy on several occasions. In the eighteenth century, for example, Johan van Gool was annoyed by Houbraken, who believed that the artist painters of The Hague had founded their Confrerie in 1662, while it was abundantly clear to Van Gool that the correct date was 1656. Nowadays the question under discussion is the nature of the Confrerie as an organisation. Was it the first step towards an eighteenth-century society, as Hoogewerff suggested in his authoritative book on the Dutch St Luke’s guilds, or was the new organisation more like a guild, as later argued by Hoogewerff’s most important critic Hessel Miedema? Based on archival records, this article maps out the early history and establishment of the Confrerie in order to determine what kind of organisation it had been between 1656 and 1700. This article argues that all four authors are right: the Confrerie was both a guild and a society, and however paradoxical it may sound, it was founded in 1656 and again in 1662.","PeriodicalId":37252,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Low Countries","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Guild to Society: The Foundation of Confrerie Pictura in The Hague Revisited\",\"authors\":\"P. Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/EMLC.92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The foundation of the Confrerie Pictura (an artistic brotherhood) in The Hague has given rise to controversy on several occasions. In the eighteenth century, for example, Johan van Gool was annoyed by Houbraken, who believed that the artist painters of The Hague had founded their Confrerie in 1662, while it was abundantly clear to Van Gool that the correct date was 1656. Nowadays the question under discussion is the nature of the Confrerie as an organisation. Was it the first step towards an eighteenth-century society, as Hoogewerff suggested in his authoritative book on the Dutch St Luke’s guilds, or was the new organisation more like a guild, as later argued by Hoogewerff’s most important critic Hessel Miedema? Based on archival records, this article maps out the early history and establishment of the Confrerie in order to determine what kind of organisation it had been between 1656 and 1700. This article argues that all four authors are right: the Confrerie was both a guild and a society, and however paradoxical it may sound, it was founded in 1656 and again in 1662.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Modern Low Countries\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Modern Low Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/EMLC.92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Low Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/EMLC.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

艺术兄弟会Confrerie Pictura在海牙的成立曾多次引发争议。例如,在18世纪,Johan van Gool对Houbraken感到恼火,他认为海牙的艺术家和画家在1662年建立了他们的Confrerie,而van Gool非常清楚,正确的日期是1656年。现在讨论的问题是Confrerie作为一个组织的性质。这是迈向18世纪社会的第一步,正如胡在其关于荷兰圣卢克公会的权威著作中所建议的那样,还是像胡最重要的评论家赫塞尔·米德玛后来所说的那样,新组织更像一个公会?根据档案记录,本文绘制了Confrerie的早期历史和建立,以确定它在1656年至1700年间是一个什么样的组织。这篇文章认为,四位作者都是对的:Confrerie既是一个公会,也是一个社会,无论听起来多么矛盾,它成立于1656年,再次成立于1662年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Guild to Society: The Foundation of Confrerie Pictura in The Hague Revisited
The foundation of the Confrerie Pictura (an artistic brotherhood) in The Hague has given rise to controversy on several occasions. In the eighteenth century, for example, Johan van Gool was annoyed by Houbraken, who believed that the artist painters of The Hague had founded their Confrerie in 1662, while it was abundantly clear to Van Gool that the correct date was 1656. Nowadays the question under discussion is the nature of the Confrerie as an organisation. Was it the first step towards an eighteenth-century society, as Hoogewerff suggested in his authoritative book on the Dutch St Luke’s guilds, or was the new organisation more like a guild, as later argued by Hoogewerff’s most important critic Hessel Miedema? Based on archival records, this article maps out the early history and establishment of the Confrerie in order to determine what kind of organisation it had been between 1656 and 1700. This article argues that all four authors are right: the Confrerie was both a guild and a society, and however paradoxical it may sound, it was founded in 1656 and again in 1662.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Modern Low Countries
Early Modern Low Countries Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Remains of the Night Shared Futures in Times of Rupture Wim van Anrooij en Paul Hoftijzer (eds.), Tot publijcque dienst der studie. Boeken uit de Bibliotheca Thysiana Revisiting Presentism Time and Temporality in the Early Modern Low Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1