牧师可以为特殊目的做弥撒吗?

IF 0.1 N/A RELIGION Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1353/atp.2022.0026
Thomas Crean
{"title":"牧师可以为特殊目的做弥撒吗?","authors":"Thomas Crean","doi":"10.1353/atp.2022.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Some contemporary theologians have claimed that it is misleading to speak of a priest as offering Mass for a special intention, and that it would be more accurate to speak of him as inviting all present to pray for that intention. My article traces the roots of this opinion in the historical work of Edward Kilmartin and the speculative work of Karl Rahner. I argue that Kilmartin misinterpreted or misrepresented his mediaeval sources, and that Rahner's account of the nature and fruits of the Mass is implausible, on both magisterial and liturgical grounds. I conclude that the concept of priestly intention contained in canon law is theologically well-founded.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can a Priest Offer Mass for a Special Intention?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Crean\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/atp.2022.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Some contemporary theologians have claimed that it is misleading to speak of a priest as offering Mass for a special intention, and that it would be more accurate to speak of him as inviting all present to pray for that intention. My article traces the roots of this opinion in the historical work of Edward Kilmartin and the speculative work of Karl Rahner. I argue that Kilmartin misinterpreted or misrepresented his mediaeval sources, and that Rahner's account of the nature and fruits of the Mass is implausible, on both magisterial and liturgical grounds. I conclude that the concept of priestly intention contained in canon law is theologically well-founded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2022.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2022.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:一些当代神学家声称,将牧师说成是出于特殊目的而做弥撒是一种误导,而将他说成是邀请所有在场的人为这种意图祈祷更准确。我的文章从爱德华·基尔马丁的历史著作和卡尔·雷纳的思辨著作中追溯了这种观点的根源。我认为,基尔马丁误解或歪曲了他的中世纪来源,而雷纳对弥撒的性质和成果的描述在权威和礼拜仪式上都是不可信的。我的结论是,教会法中包含的祭司意图的概念在神学上是有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can a Priest Offer Mass for a Special Intention?
ABSTRACT:Some contemporary theologians have claimed that it is misleading to speak of a priest as offering Mass for a special intention, and that it would be more accurate to speak of him as inviting all present to pray for that intention. My article traces the roots of this opinion in the historical work of Edward Kilmartin and the speculative work of Karl Rahner. I argue that Kilmartin misinterpreted or misrepresented his mediaeval sources, and that Rahner's account of the nature and fruits of the Mass is implausible, on both magisterial and liturgical grounds. I conclude that the concept of priestly intention contained in canon law is theologically well-founded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Sacramental Concelebration: Historical and Theological Perspectives on Contemporary Practice Faith and the Sacraments: A Commentary on the International Theological Commission's The Reciprocity between Faith and the Sacraments in the Sacramental Economy ed. by Thomas G. Weinandy, O.F.M. (review) A Guide to John Henry Newman: His Life and Thought ed. by Juan R. Vélez (review) Eucharistic Primacy of the Universal Church: The College of Bishops Makes the Eucharist, The Eucharist Makes the Universal Church Joseph Custos: The Role of Saint Joseph in a Thirteenth-Century Office and Mass for His Feast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1