烹调方法对各种动物肉的营养特性和品质特性的不同影响

A. Olagunju, Ifeanyi D. Nwachukwu
{"title":"烹调方法对各种动物肉的营养特性和品质特性的不同影响","authors":"A. Olagunju, Ifeanyi D. Nwachukwu","doi":"10.17508/cjfst.2020.12.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article history: Received: June 4, 2019 Accepted: December 2, 2019 This study investigated the various effects of two food product processing methods (boiling and grilling) on the nutritional composition (fatty acid, amino acid profiles) of meat from cows, goats, and rabbits. Freshly slaughtered animals were cleaned and subjected to boiling and grilling. Cooking loss varied with cooking methods; grilling resulted in the highest cooking loss, especially in cow meat (52.95%). Data from the proximate composition analysis revealed that both raw and grilled meat samples of rabbit meat contained the highest amount of protein (22.93 and 22.20 %, respectively) when compared to the corresponding samples from the other two animal sources. Additionally, rabbit meat contained a low level of fat (1.85%), which was not significantly different than the boiled samples (1.75, 1.76 %). Boiling and grilling significantly increased the in vitro protein digestibility of meat. The meat showed significant sources of both essential and non-essential amino acids. Rabbit meat showed a higher proportion of essential amino acids and a higher protein efficiency ratio. Boiled goat meat had a lower proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA), boiled meat had higher polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than its grilled counterpart. Goat meat showed a favourable fatty acid profile. Thus, goat and rabbit meat are healthier alternatives to beef, and both boiling and grilling are useful in maintaining the nutritional qualities of meat.","PeriodicalId":10771,"journal":{"name":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The differential effects of cooking methods on the nutritional properties and quality attributes of meat from various animal sources\",\"authors\":\"A. Olagunju, Ifeanyi D. Nwachukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.17508/cjfst.2020.12.1.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article history: Received: June 4, 2019 Accepted: December 2, 2019 This study investigated the various effects of two food product processing methods (boiling and grilling) on the nutritional composition (fatty acid, amino acid profiles) of meat from cows, goats, and rabbits. Freshly slaughtered animals were cleaned and subjected to boiling and grilling. Cooking loss varied with cooking methods; grilling resulted in the highest cooking loss, especially in cow meat (52.95%). Data from the proximate composition analysis revealed that both raw and grilled meat samples of rabbit meat contained the highest amount of protein (22.93 and 22.20 %, respectively) when compared to the corresponding samples from the other two animal sources. Additionally, rabbit meat contained a low level of fat (1.85%), which was not significantly different than the boiled samples (1.75, 1.76 %). Boiling and grilling significantly increased the in vitro protein digestibility of meat. The meat showed significant sources of both essential and non-essential amino acids. Rabbit meat showed a higher proportion of essential amino acids and a higher protein efficiency ratio. Boiled goat meat had a lower proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA), boiled meat had higher polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than its grilled counterpart. Goat meat showed a favourable fatty acid profile. Thus, goat and rabbit meat are healthier alternatives to beef, and both boiling and grilling are useful in maintaining the nutritional qualities of meat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian journal of food science and technology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"37-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian journal of food science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17508/cjfst.2020.12.1.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17508/cjfst.2020.12.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文章历史:收到时间:2019年6月4日接受时间:2019月2日本研究调查了两种食品加工方法(煮沸和烧烤)对牛、山羊和兔子肉的营养成分(脂肪酸、氨基酸图谱)的各种影响。新鲜屠宰的动物被清洗,并进行煮沸和烧烤。烹饪损失因烹饪方法而异;烧烤造成的烹饪损失最高,尤其是牛肉(52.95%)。接近成分分析的数据显示,与其他两种动物来源的相应样品相比,兔肉的生肉和烤肉样品都含有最高量的蛋白质(分别为22.93%和22.20%)。此外,兔肉的脂肪含量较低(1.85%),与煮熟的样品(1.75、1.76%)没有显著差异。水煮和烧烤显著提高了肉的体外蛋白质消化率。这些肉显示出重要的必需和非必需氨基酸来源。兔肉的必需氨基酸比例较高,蛋白质效率较高。水煮羊肉的饱和脂肪酸(SFA)比例较低,水煮肉的多不饱和脂肪酸含量高于烤羊肉。山羊肉显示出良好的脂肪酸特征。因此,羊肉和兔肉是牛肉的更健康的替代品,煮沸和烧烤都有助于保持肉的营养品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The differential effects of cooking methods on the nutritional properties and quality attributes of meat from various animal sources
Article history: Received: June 4, 2019 Accepted: December 2, 2019 This study investigated the various effects of two food product processing methods (boiling and grilling) on the nutritional composition (fatty acid, amino acid profiles) of meat from cows, goats, and rabbits. Freshly slaughtered animals were cleaned and subjected to boiling and grilling. Cooking loss varied with cooking methods; grilling resulted in the highest cooking loss, especially in cow meat (52.95%). Data from the proximate composition analysis revealed that both raw and grilled meat samples of rabbit meat contained the highest amount of protein (22.93 and 22.20 %, respectively) when compared to the corresponding samples from the other two animal sources. Additionally, rabbit meat contained a low level of fat (1.85%), which was not significantly different than the boiled samples (1.75, 1.76 %). Boiling and grilling significantly increased the in vitro protein digestibility of meat. The meat showed significant sources of both essential and non-essential amino acids. Rabbit meat showed a higher proportion of essential amino acids and a higher protein efficiency ratio. Boiled goat meat had a lower proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA), boiled meat had higher polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than its grilled counterpart. Goat meat showed a favourable fatty acid profile. Thus, goat and rabbit meat are healthier alternatives to beef, and both boiling and grilling are useful in maintaining the nutritional qualities of meat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parametric statistical analysis of microbiological water quality indicators Pro-vitamin A content of red palm oil emulsions formed with malted bambara groundnut, Brachystegia eurycoma (achi) and cowpea Chemical and antioxidant properties of two non-dairy probiotic drinks produced from tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) and soybean (Glycine max) Standardization of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for measuring xylanase activity Effects of roasting conditions on sensory attributes, polyphenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1