S. Franz, B. Schulz, Haili Wang, Sabine Gottschalk, Florian Grüter, Jochen Friedrich, J. Glaesener, F. Bock, C. Schott, Rachel Müller, Kevin Schultes, G. Landmann, H. Gerner, V. Dietz, R. Treede, N. Weidner
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者疼痛的处理:德语脊髓损伤医学协会指南","authors":"S. Franz, B. Schulz, Haili Wang, Sabine Gottschalk, Florian Grüter, Jochen Friedrich, J. Glaesener, F. Bock, C. Schott, Rachel Müller, Kevin Schultes, G. Landmann, H. Gerner, V. Dietz, R. Treede, N. Weidner","doi":"10.3205/000271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pain is a prominent complication in spinal cord injury (SCI). It can either occur as a direct or as an indirect consequence of SCI and it often heavily influences the quality of life of affected individuals. In SCI, nociceptive and neuropathic pain can equally emerge at the same time above or below the level of injury. Thus, classification and grading of pain is frequently difficult. Effective treatment of SCI-related pain in general and of neuropathic pain in particular is challenging. Current treatment options are sparse and their evidence is considered to be limited. Considering these aspects, a clinical practice guideline was developed as basis for an optimized, comprehensive and standardized pain management in SCI-related pain. Methods: The German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury (Deutschsprachige Medizinische Gesellschaft für Paraplegiologie – DMGP) developed a clinical practice guideline that received consensus from seven further German-speaking medical societies and one patient organization. The evidence base from clinical trials and meta-analyses was summarized and subjected to a structured consensus-process in accordance with the regulations of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the methodological requirements of the “German instrument for methodological guideline appraisal”. Results: This consensus-based guideline (S2k classification according to the AWMF guidance manual and rules) resulted in seven on-topic statements and 17 specific recommendations relevant to the classification, assessment and therapy of pain directly or indirectly caused by SCI. Recommended therapeutic approaches comprise pharmacological (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticonvulsants) and non-pharmacological (e.g. physical activity or psychotherapeutic techniques) strategies for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Discussion: Assessment of SCI-related pain is standardized and respective methods in terms of examination, classification and grading of pain are already in use and validated in German language. In contrast, valid, evidence-based and efficient therapeutic options are limited and ask for further clinical studies, ideally randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/000271","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: Guideline of the German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury\",\"authors\":\"S. Franz, B. Schulz, Haili Wang, Sabine Gottschalk, Florian Grüter, Jochen Friedrich, J. Glaesener, F. Bock, C. Schott, Rachel Müller, Kevin Schultes, G. Landmann, H. Gerner, V. Dietz, R. Treede, N. Weidner\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/000271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pain is a prominent complication in spinal cord injury (SCI). It can either occur as a direct or as an indirect consequence of SCI and it often heavily influences the quality of life of affected individuals. In SCI, nociceptive and neuropathic pain can equally emerge at the same time above or below the level of injury. Thus, classification and grading of pain is frequently difficult. Effective treatment of SCI-related pain in general and of neuropathic pain in particular is challenging. Current treatment options are sparse and their evidence is considered to be limited. Considering these aspects, a clinical practice guideline was developed as basis for an optimized, comprehensive and standardized pain management in SCI-related pain. Methods: The German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury (Deutschsprachige Medizinische Gesellschaft für Paraplegiologie – DMGP) developed a clinical practice guideline that received consensus from seven further German-speaking medical societies and one patient organization. The evidence base from clinical trials and meta-analyses was summarized and subjected to a structured consensus-process in accordance with the regulations of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the methodological requirements of the “German instrument for methodological guideline appraisal”. Results: This consensus-based guideline (S2k classification according to the AWMF guidance manual and rules) resulted in seven on-topic statements and 17 specific recommendations relevant to the classification, assessment and therapy of pain directly or indirectly caused by SCI. Recommended therapeutic approaches comprise pharmacological (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticonvulsants) and non-pharmacological (e.g. physical activity or psychotherapeutic techniques) strategies for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Discussion: Assessment of SCI-related pain is standardized and respective methods in terms of examination, classification and grading of pain are already in use and validated in German language. In contrast, valid, evidence-based and efficient therapeutic options are limited and ask for further clinical studies, ideally randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS German Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/000271\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS German Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/000271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
引言:疼痛是脊髓损伤(SCI)的一个突出并发症。它可以作为SCI的直接或间接后果发生,通常严重影响受影响个体的生活质量。在SCI中,伤害性疼痛和神经性疼痛可以在损伤程度以上或以下同时出现。因此,疼痛的分类和分级通常是困难的。有效治疗脊髓损伤相关疼痛,尤其是神经性疼痛是具有挑战性的。目前的治疗选择很少,其证据被认为是有限的。考虑到这些方面,制定了一份临床实践指南,作为SCI相关疼痛的优化、全面和标准化疼痛管理的基础。方法:讲德语的脊髓损伤医学会(Deutschesprachige Medizinische Gesellschaft für Paradispolologie–DMGP)制定了一项临床实践指南,该指南得到了另外七个讲德语的医学会和一个患者组织的一致同意。根据德国科学医学会协会(AWMF)的规定和“德国方法指南评估工具”的方法要求,总结了临床试验和荟萃分析的证据基础,并对其进行了结构化的共识过程。结果:这项基于共识的指南(根据AWMF指南手册和规则进行S2k分类)产生了7项主题声明和17项与SCI直接或间接引起的疼痛的分类、评估和治疗相关的具体建议。推荐的治疗方法包括针对伤害性疼痛和神经性疼痛的药理学(如非甾体抗炎药或抗惊厥药)和非药理学(如身体活动或心理治疗技术)策略。讨论:SCI相关疼痛的评估是标准化的,疼痛的检查、分类和分级方面的相应方法已经在使用,并在德语中得到了验证。相比之下,有效、循证和有效的治疗选择是有限的,需要进一步的临床研究,最好是随机对照试验和荟萃分析。
Management of pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: Guideline of the German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury
Introduction: Pain is a prominent complication in spinal cord injury (SCI). It can either occur as a direct or as an indirect consequence of SCI and it often heavily influences the quality of life of affected individuals. In SCI, nociceptive and neuropathic pain can equally emerge at the same time above or below the level of injury. Thus, classification and grading of pain is frequently difficult. Effective treatment of SCI-related pain in general and of neuropathic pain in particular is challenging. Current treatment options are sparse and their evidence is considered to be limited. Considering these aspects, a clinical practice guideline was developed as basis for an optimized, comprehensive and standardized pain management in SCI-related pain. Methods: The German-Speaking Medical Society for Spinal Cord Injury (Deutschsprachige Medizinische Gesellschaft für Paraplegiologie – DMGP) developed a clinical practice guideline that received consensus from seven further German-speaking medical societies and one patient organization. The evidence base from clinical trials and meta-analyses was summarized and subjected to a structured consensus-process in accordance with the regulations of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the methodological requirements of the “German instrument for methodological guideline appraisal”. Results: This consensus-based guideline (S2k classification according to the AWMF guidance manual and rules) resulted in seven on-topic statements and 17 specific recommendations relevant to the classification, assessment and therapy of pain directly or indirectly caused by SCI. Recommended therapeutic approaches comprise pharmacological (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticonvulsants) and non-pharmacological (e.g. physical activity or psychotherapeutic techniques) strategies for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Discussion: Assessment of SCI-related pain is standardized and respective methods in terms of examination, classification and grading of pain are already in use and validated in German language. In contrast, valid, evidence-based and efficient therapeutic options are limited and ask for further clinical studies, ideally randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.