应用质量改进过程评估在门诊焦虑症专科诊所等候名单上的病人的自我指导治疗

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.11.006
David F. Bradley, Terence H.W. Ching, Lauren Languido, Robert E. Brady
{"title":"应用质量改进过程评估在门诊焦虑症专科诊所等候名单上的病人的自我指导治疗","authors":"David F. Bradley,&nbsp;Terence H.W. Ching,&nbsp;Lauren Languido,&nbsp;Robert E. Brady","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The demand for psychological services in the United States is higher than the available supply of qualified mental health professionals. As a result, there is a substantial need for low-cost interventions that are more accessible and amenable to scale-up independent of the availability of clinicians. Previous studies have found that self-directed bibliotherapy can be an effective intervention with minimal therapist contact. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) improvement process framework, we implemented self-directed therapy in our outpatient anxiety disorders specialty clinic. We identified four self-directed therapy resources (two books and two smartphone apps) based on cognitive behavioral or acceptance and mindfulness principles. We conducted initial 30-minute billable bibliotherapy consultations with six patients on our waitlist, where we provided the rationale for self-guided treatment, introduced the four resources, helped the patient identify one resource to use, and answered any questions. Eight weeks later, we met with five of these patients for a second billable 30-minute consultation (one had already started individual therapy) and gathered information regarding feasibility and acceptability of these resources as well as helped the patient make continued or better use of the resource until beginning therapy. This case series suggests that self-directed interventions can be effectively implemented in this manner, though with mixed outcomes and effects on patients and their course of care. We describe improvements we intend to implement in future iterations of self-directed therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 229-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a Quality Improvement Process to Evaluate Self-Directed Therapy for Patients on a Waitlist in an Outpatient Anxiety Disorders Specialty Clinic\",\"authors\":\"David F. Bradley,&nbsp;Terence H.W. Ching,&nbsp;Lauren Languido,&nbsp;Robert E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The demand for psychological services in the United States is higher than the available supply of qualified mental health professionals. As a result, there is a substantial need for low-cost interventions that are more accessible and amenable to scale-up independent of the availability of clinicians. Previous studies have found that self-directed bibliotherapy can be an effective intervention with minimal therapist contact. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) improvement process framework, we implemented self-directed therapy in our outpatient anxiety disorders specialty clinic. We identified four self-directed therapy resources (two books and two smartphone apps) based on cognitive behavioral or acceptance and mindfulness principles. We conducted initial 30-minute billable bibliotherapy consultations with six patients on our waitlist, where we provided the rationale for self-guided treatment, introduced the four resources, helped the patient identify one resource to use, and answered any questions. Eight weeks later, we met with five of these patients for a second billable 30-minute consultation (one had already started individual therapy) and gathered information regarding feasibility and acceptability of these resources as well as helped the patient make continued or better use of the resource until beginning therapy. This case series suggests that self-directed interventions can be effectively implemented in this manner, though with mixed outcomes and effects on patients and their course of care. We describe improvements we intend to implement in future iterations of self-directed therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 229-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922000281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922000281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,对心理服务的需求高于合格的心理健康专业人员的供应。因此,迫切需要低成本的干预措施,这些干预措施更容易获得,并且可以在不依赖临床医生的情况下扩大规模。先前的研究发现,自我指导的阅读疗法可以是一种有效的干预,只需最少的治疗师接触。采用计划-行动-研究-行动(PDSA)改进流程框架,我们在门诊焦虑症专科诊所实施自我指导治疗。我们根据认知行为或接受和正念原则确定了四种自我导向的治疗资源(两本书和两个智能手机应用程序)。我们对候补名单上的6名患者进行了最初30分钟的收费阅读治疗咨询,在那里我们提供了自我指导治疗的基本原理,介绍了四种资源,帮助患者确定使用一种资源,并回答了任何问题。8周后,我们与其中5名患者进行了第二次30分钟的收费咨询(其中一名患者已经开始了个人治疗),收集了有关这些资源的可行性和可接受性的信息,并帮助患者继续或更好地利用这些资源,直到开始治疗。本病例系列表明,自我指导干预可以有效地以这种方式实施,尽管结果和对患者及其护理过程的影响不一。我们描述了我们打算在自我导向治疗的未来迭代中实现的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of a Quality Improvement Process to Evaluate Self-Directed Therapy for Patients on a Waitlist in an Outpatient Anxiety Disorders Specialty Clinic

The demand for psychological services in the United States is higher than the available supply of qualified mental health professionals. As a result, there is a substantial need for low-cost interventions that are more accessible and amenable to scale-up independent of the availability of clinicians. Previous studies have found that self-directed bibliotherapy can be an effective intervention with minimal therapist contact. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) improvement process framework, we implemented self-directed therapy in our outpatient anxiety disorders specialty clinic. We identified four self-directed therapy resources (two books and two smartphone apps) based on cognitive behavioral or acceptance and mindfulness principles. We conducted initial 30-minute billable bibliotherapy consultations with six patients on our waitlist, where we provided the rationale for self-guided treatment, introduced the four resources, helped the patient identify one resource to use, and answered any questions. Eight weeks later, we met with five of these patients for a second billable 30-minute consultation (one had already started individual therapy) and gathered information regarding feasibility and acceptability of these resources as well as helped the patient make continued or better use of the resource until beginning therapy. This case series suggests that self-directed interventions can be effectively implemented in this manner, though with mixed outcomes and effects on patients and their course of care. We describe improvements we intend to implement in future iterations of self-directed therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1