安大略省工人对不稳定就业工人的赔偿要求:雇主的抵制和工人的有限发言权

Q4 Social Sciences PISTES Pub Date : 2021-04-14 DOI:10.4000/PISTES.7173
E. MacEachen, Sonja Senthanar, K. Lippel
{"title":"安大略省工人对不稳定就业工人的赔偿要求:雇主的抵制和工人的有限发言权","authors":"E. MacEachen, Sonja Senthanar, K. Lippel","doi":"10.4000/PISTES.7173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed workers. A critical discourse analysis guided our study which consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 precariously-employed workers and 5 employers who had hired and managed these kinds of workers. Three domains where RTW policies fit uneasily with the experiences of precariously-employed workers were identified. These related to knowledge and power contrasts between well-informed employers and vulnerable workers, injury attribution challenges, and worker fear of speaking up about accidents. This study suggests that workers’ compensation and RTW policies rest uneasily with the circumstances of precariously-employed workers. In particular, it was difficult for workers to engage with/make a claim for workers’ compensation when employers resisted this process.","PeriodicalId":36652,"journal":{"name":"PISTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workers’ compensation claims for precariously employed workers in Ontario: employer resistance and workers’ limited voice\",\"authors\":\"E. MacEachen, Sonja Senthanar, K. Lippel\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/PISTES.7173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed workers. A critical discourse analysis guided our study which consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 precariously-employed workers and 5 employers who had hired and managed these kinds of workers. Three domains where RTW policies fit uneasily with the experiences of precariously-employed workers were identified. These related to knowledge and power contrasts between well-informed employers and vulnerable workers, injury attribution challenges, and worker fear of speaking up about accidents. This study suggests that workers’ compensation and RTW policies rest uneasily with the circumstances of precariously-employed workers. In particular, it was difficult for workers to engage with/make a claim for workers’ compensation when employers resisted this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PISTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PISTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/PISTES.7173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PISTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/PISTES.7173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

工人补偿的政策和做法几乎没有跟上不稳定就业形式增长所带来的工人和雇主需求的变化。这项研究的重点是安大略省的工人补偿和RTW政策在多大程度上符合不稳定就业工人的需求。批判性话语分析指导了我们的研究,该研究包括对15名就业不稳定的工人和5名雇佣和管理过这类工人的雇主的深入采访。确定了RTW政策与不稳定就业工人的经历不匹配的三个领域。这些与见多识广的雇主和弱势工人之间的知识和权力对比、伤害归因挑战以及工人对公开谈论事故的恐惧有关。这项研究表明,工人补偿和RTW政策与不稳定就业工人的情况不一致。特别是,当雇主抵制这一程序时,工人很难参与/提出工人赔偿要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Workers’ compensation claims for precariously employed workers in Ontario: employer resistance and workers’ limited voice
The policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed workers. A critical discourse analysis guided our study which consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 precariously-employed workers and 5 employers who had hired and managed these kinds of workers. Three domains where RTW policies fit uneasily with the experiences of precariously-employed workers were identified. These related to knowledge and power contrasts between well-informed employers and vulnerable workers, injury attribution challenges, and worker fear of speaking up about accidents. This study suggests that workers’ compensation and RTW policies rest uneasily with the circumstances of precariously-employed workers. In particular, it was difficult for workers to engage with/make a claim for workers’ compensation when employers resisted this process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PISTES
PISTES Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contextualiser pour faciliter l’accès au sens : focus sur l’enseignement du lexique en FLM, FLS et FLE ALECTOR : aide à la lecture pour les enfants dyslexiques et faibles lecteurs Expressions référentielles et formes prosodiques : quand et comment la prise en compte de notre interlocuteur guide‑t‑elle nos choix linguistiques ? Périphéries gauche et droite VAPVISIO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1