优先、权力和朝圣:超越舒适,走向挚爱的社区

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION THEOLOGY TODAY Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00405736221118650
Kermit Moss
{"title":"优先、权力和朝圣:超越舒适,走向挚爱的社区","authors":"Kermit Moss","doi":"10.1177/00405736221118650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hope for racial reconciliation among participants in the Missing Voices Project can be categorized as implicit as racial reconciliation is not an oft-used term among participants. The importance of racial reconciliation among participants is often inferred, implied, and understood but may not be stated as an explicit goal by adults or youth. This tendency might be the result of a level of discomfort talking about racism or a lack of theological language pertaining to racial reconciliation. Put simply, priorities are a matter of importance and our actions or silence about things that matter reflect our priorities. For example, regarding the importance of inclusivity, one participant remarked, “Jesus would want us to do it despite discomfort, and despite the barriers, and despite all the extra work.” However, inclusivity is not the same as racial reconciliation, nor is access and acceptance the same as acknowledgment of racism, addressing injustice, and actions toward healing and building community. Racial reconciliation is a prioritized prerogative linked to a person’s social location, material reality, primary identities, theological imperatives, and perspectives regarding what matters most in particular contexts. Hence, racial reconciliation can matter less in areas plagued with poverty and hardship where surviving to next week is more important. Racial reconciliation may also be deemed secondary to other prerogatives in communities where the “other” is simply not present or fewer in numbers due to histories of racial and income segregation. To illustrate, one young person in the Missing Voices Project shared, “My church is on 210. It’s in the nice, like, white neighborhoods that are, that don’t have to deal with a lot ... I also see ... that we separate ourselves from the problem but, like,","PeriodicalId":43855,"journal":{"name":"THEOLOGY TODAY","volume":"79 1","pages":"317 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priorities, Power, and Pilgrimage: Beyond Comfortable, toward the Beloved Community\",\"authors\":\"Kermit Moss\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00405736221118650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hope for racial reconciliation among participants in the Missing Voices Project can be categorized as implicit as racial reconciliation is not an oft-used term among participants. The importance of racial reconciliation among participants is often inferred, implied, and understood but may not be stated as an explicit goal by adults or youth. This tendency might be the result of a level of discomfort talking about racism or a lack of theological language pertaining to racial reconciliation. Put simply, priorities are a matter of importance and our actions or silence about things that matter reflect our priorities. For example, regarding the importance of inclusivity, one participant remarked, “Jesus would want us to do it despite discomfort, and despite the barriers, and despite all the extra work.” However, inclusivity is not the same as racial reconciliation, nor is access and acceptance the same as acknowledgment of racism, addressing injustice, and actions toward healing and building community. Racial reconciliation is a prioritized prerogative linked to a person’s social location, material reality, primary identities, theological imperatives, and perspectives regarding what matters most in particular contexts. Hence, racial reconciliation can matter less in areas plagued with poverty and hardship where surviving to next week is more important. Racial reconciliation may also be deemed secondary to other prerogatives in communities where the “other” is simply not present or fewer in numbers due to histories of racial and income segregation. To illustrate, one young person in the Missing Voices Project shared, “My church is on 210. It’s in the nice, like, white neighborhoods that are, that don’t have to deal with a lot ... I also see ... that we separate ourselves from the problem but, like,\",\"PeriodicalId\":43855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"317 - 323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEOLOGY TODAY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221118650\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEOLOGY TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736221118650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

失踪之声项目参与者之间种族和解的希望可以被归类为隐含的,因为种族和解不是参与者中经常使用的术语。参与者之间种族和解的重要性通常是推断、暗示和理解的,但成年人或青年可能不会将其作为明确的目标。这种倾向可能是谈论种族主义时感到不舒服,或者缺乏与种族和解有关的神学语言的结果。简单地说,优先级是一个重要的问题,我们对重要事情的行动或沉默反映了我们的优先级。例如,关于包容性的重要性,一位参与者评论道,“耶稣希望我们尽管感到不舒服,尽管有障碍,尽管有所有额外的工作,也要这样做。”然而,包容性与种族和解不同,获得和接受也不等同于承认种族主义、解决不公正问题以及治愈和建设社区的行动。种族和解是一项优先特权,与一个人的社会位置、物质现实、主要身份、神学要求以及在特定背景下最重要的观点有关。因此,在饱受贫困和苦难的地区,种族和解可能不那么重要,因为在这些地区,生存到下周更为重要。种族和解也可能被视为次要于社区中的其他特权,在这些社区中,由于种族和收入隔离的历史,“另一个”根本不存在或数量较少。为了说明这一点,失踪之声项目中的一位年轻人分享道:“我的教堂在210。它位于白人社区,不需要处理太多。。。我也看到了。。。我们把自己与问题分开,但是,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Priorities, Power, and Pilgrimage: Beyond Comfortable, toward the Beloved Community
The hope for racial reconciliation among participants in the Missing Voices Project can be categorized as implicit as racial reconciliation is not an oft-used term among participants. The importance of racial reconciliation among participants is often inferred, implied, and understood but may not be stated as an explicit goal by adults or youth. This tendency might be the result of a level of discomfort talking about racism or a lack of theological language pertaining to racial reconciliation. Put simply, priorities are a matter of importance and our actions or silence about things that matter reflect our priorities. For example, regarding the importance of inclusivity, one participant remarked, “Jesus would want us to do it despite discomfort, and despite the barriers, and despite all the extra work.” However, inclusivity is not the same as racial reconciliation, nor is access and acceptance the same as acknowledgment of racism, addressing injustice, and actions toward healing and building community. Racial reconciliation is a prioritized prerogative linked to a person’s social location, material reality, primary identities, theological imperatives, and perspectives regarding what matters most in particular contexts. Hence, racial reconciliation can matter less in areas plagued with poverty and hardship where surviving to next week is more important. Racial reconciliation may also be deemed secondary to other prerogatives in communities where the “other” is simply not present or fewer in numbers due to histories of racial and income segregation. To illustrate, one young person in the Missing Voices Project shared, “My church is on 210. It’s in the nice, like, white neighborhoods that are, that don’t have to deal with a lot ... I also see ... that we separate ourselves from the problem but, like,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEOLOGY TODAY
THEOLOGY TODAY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Environmentalism as Religion The Significance of the Theological Declaration of Barmen 1934 and “Christophobia in Europe” Today Book Review: The Ethics of Tainted Legacies: Human Flourishing after Traumatic Pasts by Karen V. Guth Book Review: 20 Myths about Religion and Politics in America by Ryan P. Burge Book Review: Against the Hounds of Hell: A Life of Howard Thurman by Peter Eisenstadt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1