我们需要在精神病治疗的公开描述中增加多样性和细微差别

Keith Gallagher
{"title":"我们需要在精神病治疗的公开描述中增加多样性和细微差别","authors":"Keith Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2022.2063368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT People with lived experience of psychosis now have more access than ever to share their own stories and learn about others’ via social media and public health campaigns. However, lived experience accounts that deal with race-based bias and inequity, ambivalent attitudes toward the biomedical illness model, or negative or harmful experiences of treatment remain less visible. Such accounts may help many who are experiencing psychosis to locate themselves in the narratives of others and access insights about recovery and navigating treatment which are currently absent. Future efforts to uplift diverse accounts of lived experience should involve people with lived experience as formal collaborators, make room for discussion of the shortcomings of treatment, and prioritize especially marginalized voices and perspectives.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":"15 1","pages":"112 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We need more diversity and nuance in public accounts of psychosis treatment\",\"authors\":\"Keith Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17522439.2022.2063368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT People with lived experience of psychosis now have more access than ever to share their own stories and learn about others’ via social media and public health campaigns. However, lived experience accounts that deal with race-based bias and inequity, ambivalent attitudes toward the biomedical illness model, or negative or harmful experiences of treatment remain less visible. Such accounts may help many who are experiencing psychosis to locate themselves in the narratives of others and access insights about recovery and navigating treatment which are currently absent. Future efforts to uplift diverse accounts of lived experience should involve people with lived experience as formal collaborators, make room for discussion of the shortcomings of treatment, and prioritize especially marginalized voices and perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"112 - 114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2022.2063368\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2022.2063368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有精神病经历的人现在比以往任何时候都有更多的机会通过社交媒体和公共卫生活动分享自己的故事,并了解他人的故事。然而,处理基于种族的偏见和不平等,对生物医学疾病模型的矛盾态度,或治疗的负面或有害经历的生活经验仍然不太明显。这样的描述可能会帮助许多正在经历精神病的人在别人的叙述中定位自己,并获得目前缺乏的关于康复和导航治疗的见解。未来提升对生活经验的多样化描述的努力应该让有生活经验的人成为正式的合作者,为讨论治疗的缺点腾出空间,并优先考虑特别边缘化的声音和观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
We need more diversity and nuance in public accounts of psychosis treatment
ABSTRACT People with lived experience of psychosis now have more access than ever to share their own stories and learn about others’ via social media and public health campaigns. However, lived experience accounts that deal with race-based bias and inequity, ambivalent attitudes toward the biomedical illness model, or negative or harmful experiences of treatment remain less visible. Such accounts may help many who are experiencing psychosis to locate themselves in the narratives of others and access insights about recovery and navigating treatment which are currently absent. Future efforts to uplift diverse accounts of lived experience should involve people with lived experience as formal collaborators, make room for discussion of the shortcomings of treatment, and prioritize especially marginalized voices and perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery , by Ann Bracken, Simpsonville, MD, Charing Cross Press, 2023, 227 pp., $18.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978057839433-6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1