{"title":"芒果切口用于压疮坏死组织清除:对严重合并症患者进行化学清创的一种更简单、更安全的方法","authors":"Takumi Yamamoto , Nana Yamamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Treatment<span> of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical </span></span>debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.0 vs. 4.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.2 vs. 12.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.6 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.5 vs. 29.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.3<!--> <!-->s, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 43-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mango cut incision for pressure ulcer necrotic tissue clearance: An easier and safer method to facilitate chemical debridement in severely-comorbid patients\",\"authors\":\"Takumi Yamamoto , Nana Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Treatment<span> of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical </span></span>debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.0 vs. 4.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.2 vs. 12.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.6 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.5 vs. 29.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.3<!--> <!-->s, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909517300241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909517300241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:在有严重合并症的老年患者中,压疮伴坏死组织形成的治疗具有挑战性。虽然指征和推荐,但由于一般情况,手术清创并不总是适用。需要简单、方便、微创的介入,以促进坏死组织的化学清创。方法对17例顽固性压疮合并坏死组织形成患者行常规清创(CD)或芒果切口(MCI)治疗。通过比较CD和MCI患者的临床结果来评估MCI方法的可行性。结果CD组与MCI组在坏死组织清除时间(3.1±2.0周vs. 4.0±1.5周,P = 0.366)和压疮愈合时间(14.7±6.2周vs. 12.7±5.6周,P = 0.566)上差异无统计学意义。CD组干预所需时间明显长于MCI组(173.8±44.5 vs 29.4±13.3 s, P <0.001)。与MCI相比,CD手术与更高的出血率相关(38%比0%,P = 0.043)。结论smci可以微创清除坏死组织,其临床可接受的结果与CD相一致,可以作为有严重合并症的坏死合并压疮患者的一种选择方法。
Mango cut incision for pressure ulcer necrotic tissue clearance: An easier and safer method to facilitate chemical debridement in severely-comorbid patients
Background
Treatment of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.
Methods
Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.
Results
Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1 ± 2.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.5 weeks, P = 0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7 ± 6.2 vs. 12.7 ± 5.6 weeks, P = 0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8 ± 44.5 vs. 29.4 ± 13.3 s, P < 0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, P = 0.043).
Conclusions
MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.