芒果切口用于压疮坏死组织清除:对严重合并症患者进行化学清创的一种更简单、更安全的方法

Q1 Medicine Wound Medicine Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003
Takumi Yamamoto , Nana Yamamoto
{"title":"芒果切口用于压疮坏死组织清除:对严重合并症患者进行化学清创的一种更简单、更安全的方法","authors":"Takumi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Nana Yamamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Treatment<span> of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical </span></span>debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.0 vs. 4.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.2 vs. 12.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.6 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.5 vs. 29.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.3<!--> <!-->s, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 43-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mango cut incision for pressure ulcer necrotic tissue clearance: An easier and safer method to facilitate chemical debridement in severely-comorbid patients\",\"authors\":\"Takumi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Nana Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Treatment<span> of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical </span></span>debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.0 vs. 4.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.5 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.2 vs. 12.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.6 weeks, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.5 vs. 29.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.3<!--> <!-->s, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909517300241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909517300241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在有严重合并症的老年患者中,压疮伴坏死组织形成的治疗具有挑战性。虽然指征和推荐,但由于一般情况,手术清创并不总是适用。需要简单、方便、微创的介入,以促进坏死组织的化学清创。方法对17例顽固性压疮合并坏死组织形成患者行常规清创(CD)或芒果切口(MCI)治疗。通过比较CD和MCI患者的临床结果来评估MCI方法的可行性。结果CD组与MCI组在坏死组织清除时间(3.1±2.0周vs. 4.0±1.5周,P = 0.366)和压疮愈合时间(14.7±6.2周vs. 12.7±5.6周,P = 0.566)上差异无统计学意义。CD组干预所需时间明显长于MCI组(173.8±44.5 vs 29.4±13.3 s, P <0.001)。与MCI相比,CD手术与更高的出血率相关(38%比0%,P = 0.043)。结论smci可以微创清除坏死组织,其临床可接受的结果与CD相一致,可以作为有严重合并症的坏死合并压疮患者的一种选择方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mango cut incision for pressure ulcer necrotic tissue clearance: An easier and safer method to facilitate chemical debridement in severely-comorbid patients

Background

Treatment of pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue formation is challenging in old patients with severe comorbidities. Although indicated and recommended, surgical debridement cannot always be applied because of general conditions. Simple, convenient, and minimally invasive intervention is required to facilitate chemical debridement of necrotic tissue.

Methods

Seventeen patients suffering from intractable pressure ulcer complicated with necrotic tissue formation underwent conventional debridement (CD) or mango cut incision (MCI). Feasibility of MCI method was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CD and MCI.

Results

Between patients undergoing CD and MCI, there was no significant difference in time for necrotic tissue clearance (3.1 ± 2.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.5 weeks, P = 0.366), nor in time for pressure ulcer cure (14.7 ± 6.2 vs. 12.7 ± 5.6 weeks, P = 0.566). Time required for intervention was significantly longer in CD than that in MCI (173.8 ± 44.5 vs. 29.4 ± 13.3 s, P < 0.001). CD procedure was associated with significantly higher rate of bleeding compared with MCI (38% vs. 0%, P = 0.043).

Conclusions

MCI allows minimally invasive clearance of necrotic tissue with clinically acceptable outcomes compatible to CD, and can be a choice of method for necrosis-complicated pressure ulcers in patients with severe comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healing potential of Caiman yacare (Daudin, 1802) visceral fat oil Fibrin sealant for split-thickness skin graft fixation in burn wounds - An ancillary postulated role in scar modulation Graphene-based materials in drug delivery and growth factor release: A critical review Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes accelerate open wound healing better than amniotic membranes: A histological study on the proliferation phase Honey based treatment strategies for infected wounds and burns: A systematic review of recent pre-clinical research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1