应用直接/粘接区法评价围巾粘接接头

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry Applied Adhesion Science Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2
D. F. O. Silva, R. D. S. G. Campilho, F. J. G. Silva, U. T. F. Carvalho
{"title":"应用直接/粘接区法评价围巾粘接接头","authors":"D. F. O. Silva,&nbsp;R. D. S. G. Campilho,&nbsp;F. J. G. Silva,&nbsp;U. T. F. Carvalho","doi":"10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the increasing use of structures with adhesive bonds at the industrial level, several authors in the last decades have been conducting studies concerning the behaviour and strength of adhesive joints. Between the available strength prediction methods, cohesive zone models, which have shown good results, are particularly relevant. This work consists of a validation of cohesive laws in traction and shear, estimated by the application of the direct method, in the strength prediction of joints under a mixed-mode loading. In this context, scarf joints with different scarf angles (<i>α</i>) and adhesives of different ductility were tested. Pure-mode cohesive laws served as the basis for the creation of simplified triangular, trapezoidal and exponential laws for all adhesives. Their validation was accomplished by comparing the numerical maximum load (<i>P</i><sub>m</sub>) predictions with the experimental results. An analysis of peel (<i>σ</i>) and shear (<i>τ</i>) stresses in the adhesive layer was also performed to understand the influence of stresses on <i>P</i><sub>m</sub>. The use of the direct method allowed obtaining very precise <i>P</i><sub>m</sub> predictions. For the geometric and material conditions considered, this study has led to the conclusion that no significant <i>P</i><sub>m</sub> errors are incurred by the choice of a less appropriate law or by uncoupling the loading modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application a direct/cohesive zone method for the evaluation of scarf adhesive joints\",\"authors\":\"D. F. O. Silva,&nbsp;R. D. S. G. Campilho,&nbsp;F. J. G. Silva,&nbsp;U. T. F. Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With the increasing use of structures with adhesive bonds at the industrial level, several authors in the last decades have been conducting studies concerning the behaviour and strength of adhesive joints. Between the available strength prediction methods, cohesive zone models, which have shown good results, are particularly relevant. This work consists of a validation of cohesive laws in traction and shear, estimated by the application of the direct method, in the strength prediction of joints under a mixed-mode loading. In this context, scarf joints with different scarf angles (<i>α</i>) and adhesives of different ductility were tested. Pure-mode cohesive laws served as the basis for the creation of simplified triangular, trapezoidal and exponential laws for all adhesives. Their validation was accomplished by comparing the numerical maximum load (<i>P</i><sub>m</sub>) predictions with the experimental results. An analysis of peel (<i>σ</i>) and shear (<i>τ</i>) stresses in the adhesive layer was also performed to understand the influence of stresses on <i>P</i><sub>m</sub>. The use of the direct method allowed obtaining very precise <i>P</i><sub>m</sub> predictions. For the geometric and material conditions considered, this study has led to the conclusion that no significant <i>P</i><sub>m</sub> errors are incurred by the choice of a less appropriate law or by uncoupling the loading modes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

随着在工业水平上越来越多地使用带有粘合剂的结构,在过去的几十年里,一些作者一直在进行有关粘合剂连接的行为和强度的研究。在现有的强度预测方法中,粘聚区模型具有较好的应用前景。这项工作包括在混合模式荷载下的节点强度预测中,通过应用直接法估计牵引和剪切的内聚规律的验证。在此背景下,对不同围接角(α)的围接接头和不同延性的胶粘剂进行了试验。纯模式内聚规律是建立所有胶粘剂简化三角、梯形和指数规律的基础。他们的验证是通过比较数值最大载荷(Pm)预测和实验结果完成的。分析了粘接层的剥离应力(σ)和剪切应力(τ),以了解应力对Pm的影响。使用直接法可以得到非常精确的Pm预测。考虑到几何和材料条件,本研究得出的结论是,选择不太合适的定律或卸载加载模式不会产生显著的Pm误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application a direct/cohesive zone method for the evaluation of scarf adhesive joints

With the increasing use of structures with adhesive bonds at the industrial level, several authors in the last decades have been conducting studies concerning the behaviour and strength of adhesive joints. Between the available strength prediction methods, cohesive zone models, which have shown good results, are particularly relevant. This work consists of a validation of cohesive laws in traction and shear, estimated by the application of the direct method, in the strength prediction of joints under a mixed-mode loading. In this context, scarf joints with different scarf angles (α) and adhesives of different ductility were tested. Pure-mode cohesive laws served as the basis for the creation of simplified triangular, trapezoidal and exponential laws for all adhesives. Their validation was accomplished by comparing the numerical maximum load (Pm) predictions with the experimental results. An analysis of peel (σ) and shear (τ) stresses in the adhesive layer was also performed to understand the influence of stresses on Pm. The use of the direct method allowed obtaining very precise Pm predictions. For the geometric and material conditions considered, this study has led to the conclusion that no significant Pm errors are incurred by the choice of a less appropriate law or by uncoupling the loading modes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Influence of biobased polyol type on the properties of polyurethane hotmelt adhesives for footwear joints Effect of interface-active proteins on the salt crystal size in waterborne hybrid materials Mechanical properties of unmodified and montmorillonite-modified epoxy compounds. Part I: compression test In vitro antibacterial effect of fifth generation dentin bonding agent incorporated with nisin on Streptococcus mutans Antioxidant pre-treatments are able to reduce waiting time for restorative treatment after dental bleaching: a microtensile bond strength exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1