(重新)国际概念化:特别部分介绍

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cambridge Review of International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-10-09 DOI:10.1080/09557571.2022.2130665
Z. Çapan, J. Grzybowski
{"title":"(重新)国际概念化:特别部分介绍","authors":"Z. Çapan, J. Grzybowski","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2022.2130665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract ‘The international’ is the background condition that holds together inquiries of international politics, orders, systems, societies, practices, and so forth. Albeit being usually taken for granted, its foundational function begs the questions of what the international actually is or, instead, what conceptualisations of the international imply, project, and do. Periodic discussions in International Relations (IR) about the international as the subject matter of the field routinely revolve around attempts to fix its definition, to consciously escape it, or to return to a pragmatic approach of using rather than questioning the concept of the international. In bringing the international from the background to the fore, this Special Section investigates explicit and implicit conceptualisations of the international, and their implications. It does so in a variety of ways and areas. The special section focuses on dynamics of reification and reflection, on how the ‘international’ is opposed to the ‘transnational’ or ‘the world’, how it is denied or seemingly superseded, and how it yet retains its conceptual significance.","PeriodicalId":51580,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","volume":"35 1","pages":"775 - 782"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re-)conceptualising the international: introduction to the special section\",\"authors\":\"Z. Çapan, J. Grzybowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09557571.2022.2130665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract ‘The international’ is the background condition that holds together inquiries of international politics, orders, systems, societies, practices, and so forth. Albeit being usually taken for granted, its foundational function begs the questions of what the international actually is or, instead, what conceptualisations of the international imply, project, and do. Periodic discussions in International Relations (IR) about the international as the subject matter of the field routinely revolve around attempts to fix its definition, to consciously escape it, or to return to a pragmatic approach of using rather than questioning the concept of the international. In bringing the international from the background to the fore, this Special Section investigates explicit and implicit conceptualisations of the international, and their implications. It does so in a variety of ways and areas. The special section focuses on dynamics of reification and reflection, on how the ‘international’ is opposed to the ‘transnational’ or ‘the world’, how it is denied or seemingly superseded, and how it yet retains its conceptual significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Review of International Affairs\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"775 - 782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Review of International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2130665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2130665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“国际”是将国际政治、国际秩序、国际制度、国际社会、国际实践等问题联系在一起的背景条件。尽管通常被认为是理所当然的,但它的基本功能回避了这样的问题:国际实际上是什么,或者相反,国际的概念意味着什么,项目和做什么。在国际关系(IR)中,关于国际作为该领域主题的定期讨论通常围绕着试图确定其定义,有意识地逃避它,或回到使用而不是质疑国际概念的实用主义方法。在将国际从背景带到前台的过程中,本特别节调查了国际的明确和隐含概念及其含义。它以各种方式和领域做到这一点。特别部分侧重于物化和反思的动态,“国际”如何与“跨国”或“世界”相对立,它如何被否认或似乎被取代,以及它如何保留其概念意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Re-)conceptualising the international: introduction to the special section
Abstract ‘The international’ is the background condition that holds together inquiries of international politics, orders, systems, societies, practices, and so forth. Albeit being usually taken for granted, its foundational function begs the questions of what the international actually is or, instead, what conceptualisations of the international imply, project, and do. Periodic discussions in International Relations (IR) about the international as the subject matter of the field routinely revolve around attempts to fix its definition, to consciously escape it, or to return to a pragmatic approach of using rather than questioning the concept of the international. In bringing the international from the background to the fore, this Special Section investigates explicit and implicit conceptualisations of the international, and their implications. It does so in a variety of ways and areas. The special section focuses on dynamics of reification and reflection, on how the ‘international’ is opposed to the ‘transnational’ or ‘the world’, how it is denied or seemingly superseded, and how it yet retains its conceptual significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International InstitutionsRohan Mukherjee, Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International Institutions , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, ISBN: 9781009195874 (ebook), 9781009186810 (hbk), 324 pp. Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia , Harper Collins, Gurugram, Haryana, India, 2023, ISBN-13: 978-9356293557, ISBN-10: 9356293554 (pbk), 336 pp Letter from the editors, CRIA Volume 37, Issue 1 Everyday nuclear histories and futures in the Middle East, 1945–1948 The ‘situatedness’ of security in postcolonial spaces: Examining the historical and spatial trajectories of localised practices in Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1