Ha-Na Kim, Jun-Yeon Kim, K. Park, Ji-Min Hwang, Jun-Yeong Jang, M. Jo, Minkailov Ko, S. Chae, Jung-hyun Kim, Bonhyuk Goo, Yeoncheol Park, B. Seo, Y. Baek, Sang-Soo Nam
{"title":"在一项随机对照临床试验中,针刺埋线治疗腰椎间盘突出症的经济评价","authors":"Ha-Na Kim, Jun-Yeon Kim, K. Park, Ji-Min Hwang, Jun-Yeong Jang, M. Jo, Minkailov Ko, S. Chae, Jung-hyun Kim, Bonhyuk Goo, Yeoncheol Park, B. Seo, Y. Baek, Sang-Soo Nam","doi":"10.13045/jar.2021.00199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (LHIVD) is a frequently presented condition/disease in Korean medical institutions. In this study, the economics of thread embedding acupuncture (TEA) was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial comparing TEA with sham TEA (STEA).Methods: This economic evaluation was analyzed from a limited social perspective, and the per-protocol set was from a basic analysis perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the change in visual analog scale score, and the cost-utility analysis was based on the quality-adjusted life years. The final results were expressed as the average cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and furthermore sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the results observed.Results: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the decrease in 100 mm visual analog scale score was 8.5 mm greater in the TEA group compared with the STEA group (p > 0.05). The cost-utility analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the quality-adjusted life years of TEA was 0.0026 years higher than STEA (p > 0.05). These results were robust in the sensitivity analysis, but were not statistically significant.Conclusion: In treating LHIVD, TEA appeared to have cost-effectiveness and cost-utility compared with STEA. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cost, effectiveness, and utility indicators. Therefore, results must be interpreted prudently; this study was the 1st to conduct an economic evaluation of TEA for LHIVD.","PeriodicalId":33306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Evaluation of Thread Embedding Acupuncture for the Treatment of Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Ha-Na Kim, Jun-Yeon Kim, K. Park, Ji-Min Hwang, Jun-Yeong Jang, M. Jo, Minkailov Ko, S. Chae, Jung-hyun Kim, Bonhyuk Goo, Yeoncheol Park, B. Seo, Y. Baek, Sang-Soo Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.13045/jar.2021.00199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (LHIVD) is a frequently presented condition/disease in Korean medical institutions. In this study, the economics of thread embedding acupuncture (TEA) was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial comparing TEA with sham TEA (STEA).Methods: This economic evaluation was analyzed from a limited social perspective, and the per-protocol set was from a basic analysis perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the change in visual analog scale score, and the cost-utility analysis was based on the quality-adjusted life years. The final results were expressed as the average cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and furthermore sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the results observed.Results: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the decrease in 100 mm visual analog scale score was 8.5 mm greater in the TEA group compared with the STEA group (p > 0.05). The cost-utility analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the quality-adjusted life years of TEA was 0.0026 years higher than STEA (p > 0.05). These results were robust in the sensitivity analysis, but were not statistically significant.Conclusion: In treating LHIVD, TEA appeared to have cost-effectiveness and cost-utility compared with STEA. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cost, effectiveness, and utility indicators. Therefore, results must be interpreted prudently; this study was the 1st to conduct an economic evaluation of TEA for LHIVD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acupuncture Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acupuncture Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13045/jar.2021.00199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13045/jar.2021.00199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:腰椎间盘突出症(LHIVD)是韩国医疗机构中常见的疾病。在这项研究中,通过一项随机对照试验,比较了埋线针刺(TEA)和假针刺(STEA)的经济性。方法:从有限的社会角度对经济评价进行分析,从基本分析角度对每个方案集进行分析。成本-效果分析基于视觉模拟量表得分的变化,成本-效用分析基于质量调整生命年。最终结果表示为平均成本-效果比和增量成本-效果比,并进行敏感性分析以证实观察结果的稳健性。结果:经成本-效果分析,TEA组比STEA组低9908韩元,100 mm视觉模拟量表评分下降幅度比STEA组大8.5 mm (p < 0.05)。经成本效用分析,TEA比STEA低9908韩元,但TEA的质量调整寿命年数比STEA高0.0026年(p < 0.05)。这些结果在敏感性分析中是稳健的,但没有统计学意义。结论:与STEA相比,TEA治疗LHIVD具有成本-效果和成本-效用。然而,在成本、有效性和效用指标方面,两组之间没有显著差异。因此,必须谨慎地解释结果;本研究首次对TEA治疗LHIVD进行了经济评价。
An Economic Evaluation of Thread Embedding Acupuncture for the Treatment of Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background: Lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (LHIVD) is a frequently presented condition/disease in Korean medical institutions. In this study, the economics of thread embedding acupuncture (TEA) was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial comparing TEA with sham TEA (STEA).Methods: This economic evaluation was analyzed from a limited social perspective, and the per-protocol set was from a basic analysis perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the change in visual analog scale score, and the cost-utility analysis was based on the quality-adjusted life years. The final results were expressed as the average cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and furthermore sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of the results observed.Results: The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the decrease in 100 mm visual analog scale score was 8.5 mm greater in the TEA group compared with the STEA group (p > 0.05). The cost-utility analysis showed that TEA was 9,908 won lower than STEA, while the quality-adjusted life years of TEA was 0.0026 years higher than STEA (p > 0.05). These results were robust in the sensitivity analysis, but were not statistically significant.Conclusion: In treating LHIVD, TEA appeared to have cost-effectiveness and cost-utility compared with STEA. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of cost, effectiveness, and utility indicators. Therefore, results must be interpreted prudently; this study was the 1st to conduct an economic evaluation of TEA for LHIVD.