尼采在《超越善与恶》中对现代性的四重批判

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Political Science Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1080/10457097.2021.1993700
Linus Recht
{"title":"尼采在《超越善与恶》中对现代性的四重批判","authors":"Linus Recht","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2021.1993700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although Nietzsche writes that Beyond Good and Evil is “in all essentials a critique of modernity,” surprisingly, the secondary literature typically slips past giving a precise characterization of this central concept in that work. In this paper I show that tracking Nietzsche’s use of the term \"modern\" in the work shows that Nietzsche’s “modernity” is: (I) a structure of ideas or values, (II) a psychic structure, (III) a social structure or a politics, and (IV), at the highest level a world; and that uncovering the core or substance of the critique demands careful attention to each of these four themes in light of the multiple addressees to and for whom Nietzsche writes in Beyond Good and Evil, given that he describes the work as both a \"Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future\" and \"a school for the gentilhomme.\"","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"24 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nietzsche’s Fourfold Critique of Modernity in Beyond Good and Evil\",\"authors\":\"Linus Recht\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10457097.2021.1993700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although Nietzsche writes that Beyond Good and Evil is “in all essentials a critique of modernity,” surprisingly, the secondary literature typically slips past giving a precise characterization of this central concept in that work. In this paper I show that tracking Nietzsche’s use of the term \\\"modern\\\" in the work shows that Nietzsche’s “modernity” is: (I) a structure of ideas or values, (II) a psychic structure, (III) a social structure or a politics, and (IV), at the highest level a world; and that uncovering the core or substance of the critique demands careful attention to each of these four themes in light of the multiple addressees to and for whom Nietzsche writes in Beyond Good and Evil, given that he describes the work as both a \\\"Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future\\\" and \\\"a school for the gentilhomme.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":55874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2021.1993700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2021.1993700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然尼采写道,超越善恶“在所有本质上都是对现代性的批判”,但令人惊讶的是,二手文献通常会忽略对该作品中这一中心概念的精确描述。在本文中,我展示了尼采在作品中对“现代”一词的使用,表明尼采的“现代性”是:(I)一种思想或价值观的结构,(II)一种精神结构,(III)一种社会结构或政治,(IV)在最高层次上是一个世界;揭露批判的核心或实质需要仔细关注这四个主题中的每一个,根据尼采在《超越善恶》中所写的多个地址和对象,考虑到他将作品描述为“未来哲学的前奏”和“非主流人的学校”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nietzsche’s Fourfold Critique of Modernity in Beyond Good and Evil
Abstract Although Nietzsche writes that Beyond Good and Evil is “in all essentials a critique of modernity,” surprisingly, the secondary literature typically slips past giving a precise characterization of this central concept in that work. In this paper I show that tracking Nietzsche’s use of the term "modern" in the work shows that Nietzsche’s “modernity” is: (I) a structure of ideas or values, (II) a psychic structure, (III) a social structure or a politics, and (IV), at the highest level a world; and that uncovering the core or substance of the critique demands careful attention to each of these four themes in light of the multiple addressees to and for whom Nietzsche writes in Beyond Good and Evil, given that he describes the work as both a "Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future" and "a school for the gentilhomme."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
期刊最新文献
Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? by Najeeb T. Haddad, Cascade Books, Publication Date: 2023 Conversation as Political Education Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science , by Alex Priou, Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 184 pp., ISBN 978-0-88146-914-1, Publication Date: 2023 The Politics of Suicide: Miasma and Katharmos in Plato’s Political Thought “Worse than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism,” by Erwin Chemerinsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1