阿尔巴尼亚被动革命的政治经济学:新自由主义悖论与民主化转型的关系

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1080/19448953.2023.2167342
Jonilda Rrapaj Kolasi, Klevis Kolasi
{"title":"阿尔巴尼亚被动革命的政治经济学:新自由主义悖论与民主化转型的关系","authors":"Jonilda Rrapaj Kolasi, Klevis Kolasi","doi":"10.1080/19448953.2023.2167342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What factors account for the transformation-democracy nexus and the failure of democratization in Albania? Current literature assumes that while neoliberal policy frameworks promoted by transnational actors have inextricably a democratizing effect, the failure of democratization results from internal features that are thought to be peculiar to Albania. This article challenges this assumption. Building on Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution, we show that, while the demise of ‘real socialism’ unlocked the potential towards a freer society, it was the neoliberal restructuring that placed limits on the process of democratization. The failure of Albanian democratization is associated, therefore, not with cultural peculiarities, but with neoliberal passive revolution, that led to the thwarting of democratic gains and establishment of a new class domination in line with a neoliberal accumulation strategy.","PeriodicalId":45789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"963 - 981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Economy of Passive Revolution in Albania: The Neoliberal Paradox and Transformation-Democratization Nexus\",\"authors\":\"Jonilda Rrapaj Kolasi, Klevis Kolasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19448953.2023.2167342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT What factors account for the transformation-democracy nexus and the failure of democratization in Albania? Current literature assumes that while neoliberal policy frameworks promoted by transnational actors have inextricably a democratizing effect, the failure of democratization results from internal features that are thought to be peculiar to Albania. This article challenges this assumption. Building on Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution, we show that, while the demise of ‘real socialism’ unlocked the potential towards a freer society, it was the neoliberal restructuring that placed limits on the process of democratization. The failure of Albanian democratization is associated, therefore, not with cultural peculiarities, but with neoliberal passive revolution, that led to the thwarting of democratic gains and establishment of a new class domination in line with a neoliberal accumulation strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"963 - 981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

什么因素导致了阿尔巴尼亚的转型-民主关系和民主化的失败?目前的文献认为,虽然跨国行动者推动的新自由主义政策框架具有不可避免的民主化效果,但民主化的失败源于被认为是阿尔巴尼亚特有的内部特征。本文挑战了这一假设。在安东尼奥·葛兰西的被动革命概念的基础上,我们表明,虽然“现实社会主义”的消亡释放了走向更自由社会的潜力,但新自由主义的重构限制了民主化的进程。因此,阿尔巴尼亚民主化的失败与文化特性无关,而与新自由主义的被动革命有关,这种革命导致了民主成果的受挫,并建立了符合新自由主义积累战略的新阶级统治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Political Economy of Passive Revolution in Albania: The Neoliberal Paradox and Transformation-Democratization Nexus
ABSTRACT What factors account for the transformation-democracy nexus and the failure of democratization in Albania? Current literature assumes that while neoliberal policy frameworks promoted by transnational actors have inextricably a democratizing effect, the failure of democratization results from internal features that are thought to be peculiar to Albania. This article challenges this assumption. Building on Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution, we show that, while the demise of ‘real socialism’ unlocked the potential towards a freer society, it was the neoliberal restructuring that placed limits on the process of democratization. The failure of Albanian democratization is associated, therefore, not with cultural peculiarities, but with neoliberal passive revolution, that led to the thwarting of democratic gains and establishment of a new class domination in line with a neoliberal accumulation strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
2023 Elections in Turkey within Global Context: Right Wing Populism in the Era of Global Shift Turkish Humanitarian Assistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focus on Africa Summitry Diplomacy in Turkey–Africa Relations: Statements, (Non-)Accomplishments and Effectiveness Turkey-Africa Relations and Turkey’s National Role Conception as the Centre Country: Continuity or a Break with the Past? Autonomy and Control in the Gig Economy and Platform Work: Domestic and Home Repair Workers in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1