S. Khouzam, D. Pagano, M. Barbara, V. Di Marco, G. Pietrosi, M. Maringhini, M. Canzonieri, S. Calamia, S. Gruttadauria
{"title":"肝细胞癌移植前微创肝手术的保护作用","authors":"S. Khouzam, D. Pagano, M. Barbara, V. Di Marco, G. Pietrosi, M. Maringhini, M. Canzonieri, S. Calamia, S. Gruttadauria","doi":"10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given recurrence and future need for liver transplantation (LT). Methods: Data on liver resections were gathered from the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT) from 2003-2021. A retrospective analysis of 1408 consecutive adult patients who had a liver resection was performed with categorization based on the underlying disease process. A sub-analysis studied the 291 patients who had an LLR with an intention to transplant approach after LLR. Results: From 2012 to 2020, ISMETT’s mean annual LLR rate was 45%. Data suggests that a laparoscopic approach to iterative surgical treatment for HCC has demonstrated protective benefits. Compared to open surgery or LT, LLR is protective against the risk of de-listing, post-transplant patient death, tumor recurrence, adhesions, and bleeding in a cirrhotic patient. Kaplan Meier’s analysis showed no difference between post-LT survival curves for those with prior open abdominal surgery or LLR (P = 0.658). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery has important protective advantages over laparotomy surgery for the surgical treatment of HCC, particularly since treatment is not always curative. LLR can be considered a bridge therapy for transplantation, ensuring less crowding of waiting lists, a desirable condition in areas of donor storage.","PeriodicalId":12959,"journal":{"name":"Hepatoma Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective benefit of minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to transplant\",\"authors\":\"S. Khouzam, D. Pagano, M. Barbara, V. Di Marco, G. Pietrosi, M. Maringhini, M. Canzonieri, S. Calamia, S. Gruttadauria\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given recurrence and future need for liver transplantation (LT). Methods: Data on liver resections were gathered from the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT) from 2003-2021. A retrospective analysis of 1408 consecutive adult patients who had a liver resection was performed with categorization based on the underlying disease process. A sub-analysis studied the 291 patients who had an LLR with an intention to transplant approach after LLR. Results: From 2012 to 2020, ISMETT’s mean annual LLR rate was 45%. Data suggests that a laparoscopic approach to iterative surgical treatment for HCC has demonstrated protective benefits. Compared to open surgery or LT, LLR is protective against the risk of de-listing, post-transplant patient death, tumor recurrence, adhesions, and bleeding in a cirrhotic patient. Kaplan Meier’s analysis showed no difference between post-LT survival curves for those with prior open abdominal surgery or LLR (P = 0.658). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery has important protective advantages over laparotomy surgery for the surgical treatment of HCC, particularly since treatment is not always curative. LLR can be considered a bridge therapy for transplantation, ensuring less crowding of waiting lists, a desirable condition in areas of donor storage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatoma Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)对肝细胞癌(HCC)复发和未来需要肝移植(LT)的益处。方法:从2003年至2021年,收集来自意大利科学院(instituto di Ricovero e Cura a caratere scientificere)和地中海科学院(instituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti - Terapie and alta specialzazione)的肝脏切除术数据。回顾性分析了1408例连续行肝切除术的成年患者,并根据潜在疾病进程进行了分类。一项亚分析研究了291例LLR术后有意移植入路的患者。结果:2012 - 2020年,ISMETT的年平均LLR率为45%。数据显示,腹腔镜下反复手术治疗HCC具有保护作用。与开放手术或肝移植相比,LLR对肝硬化患者的摘除术、移植后患者死亡、肿瘤复发、粘连和出血具有保护作用。Kaplan Meier的分析显示,术前腹部开腹手术或LLR患者术后生存曲线无差异(P = 0.658)。结论:对于肝细胞癌的手术治疗,腹腔镜手术比剖腹手术具有重要的保护优势,特别是在治疗并不总是治愈的情况下。LLR可以被认为是移植的桥梁疗法,确保等待名单不那么拥挤,这是供体储存区域的理想条件。
Protective benefit of minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to transplant
Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given recurrence and future need for liver transplantation (LT). Methods: Data on liver resections were gathered from the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT) from 2003-2021. A retrospective analysis of 1408 consecutive adult patients who had a liver resection was performed with categorization based on the underlying disease process. A sub-analysis studied the 291 patients who had an LLR with an intention to transplant approach after LLR. Results: From 2012 to 2020, ISMETT’s mean annual LLR rate was 45%. Data suggests that a laparoscopic approach to iterative surgical treatment for HCC has demonstrated protective benefits. Compared to open surgery or LT, LLR is protective against the risk of de-listing, post-transplant patient death, tumor recurrence, adhesions, and bleeding in a cirrhotic patient. Kaplan Meier’s analysis showed no difference between post-LT survival curves for those with prior open abdominal surgery or LLR (P = 0.658). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery has important protective advantages over laparotomy surgery for the surgical treatment of HCC, particularly since treatment is not always curative. LLR can be considered a bridge therapy for transplantation, ensuring less crowding of waiting lists, a desirable condition in areas of donor storage.