城市分权过程的比较分析:以巴塞罗那和布宜诺斯艾利斯为例

IF 0.3 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos Pub Date : 2021-05-07 DOI:10.24201/EDU.V36I2.1989
Giselle González
{"title":"城市分权过程的比较分析:以巴塞罗那和布宜诺斯艾利斯为例","authors":"Giselle González","doi":"10.24201/EDU.V36I2.1989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public territorialization policies between Buenos Aires and Barcelona are described and compared. From a qualitative design, the work is close to experiences in which processes of consolidation of public policies of territorial regionalization are observed, especially analyzing the consolidation process and the problems they currently present. The research is approached from three specific axes: context conditions, policies and actors. From there the power relations between different actors are investigated, the way in which political actors are constituted and the degrees of influence in the decision-making processes in each city. From the comparison it appears that the initiatives in Buenos Aires are designed from multilevel logics but their implementation shows strong centralization features in the central power. While in the case of Barcelona, multilevel designs and a distribution of reticular power that brings it closer to a cooperative model of metropolitan governance are embodied.","PeriodicalId":43182,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis comparado de procesos de descentralización urbana: los casos de Barcelona y Buenos Aires\",\"authors\":\"Giselle González\",\"doi\":\"10.24201/EDU.V36I2.1989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public territorialization policies between Buenos Aires and Barcelona are described and compared. From a qualitative design, the work is close to experiences in which processes of consolidation of public policies of territorial regionalization are observed, especially analyzing the consolidation process and the problems they currently present. The research is approached from three specific axes: context conditions, policies and actors. From there the power relations between different actors are investigated, the way in which political actors are constituted and the degrees of influence in the decision-making processes in each city. From the comparison it appears that the initiatives in Buenos Aires are designed from multilevel logics but their implementation shows strong centralization features in the central power. While in the case of Barcelona, multilevel designs and a distribution of reticular power that brings it closer to a cooperative model of metropolitan governance are embodied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24201/EDU.V36I2.1989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24201/EDU.V36I2.1989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍并比较了布宜诺斯艾利斯和巴塞罗那的公共属地化政策。从定性设计来看,这项工作接近于观察领土区域化公共政策整合过程的经验,特别是分析了整合过程及其目前存在的问题。这项研究从三个具体的轴来进行:背景条件、政策和行为者。在此基础上,研究了不同行为者之间的权力关系、政治行为者的构成方式以及在每个城市决策过程中的影响力。从比较来看,布宜诺斯艾利斯的倡议是从多层次逻辑设计的,但其实施表现出强烈的中央集权特征。而在巴塞罗那的案例中,体现了多层次的设计和网状权力的分配,使其更接近于大都市治理的合作模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análisis comparado de procesos de descentralización urbana: los casos de Barcelona y Buenos Aires
Public territorialization policies between Buenos Aires and Barcelona are described and compared. From a qualitative design, the work is close to experiences in which processes of consolidation of public policies of territorial regionalization are observed, especially analyzing the consolidation process and the problems they currently present. The research is approached from three specific axes: context conditions, policies and actors. From there the power relations between different actors are investigated, the way in which political actors are constituted and the degrees of influence in the decision-making processes in each city. From the comparison it appears that the initiatives in Buenos Aires are designed from multilevel logics but their implementation shows strong centralization features in the central power. While in the case of Barcelona, multilevel designs and a distribution of reticular power that brings it closer to a cooperative model of metropolitan governance are embodied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneidad de los comerciantes en cuatro mercados públicos de la Ciudad de México Viabilidad de la recuperación de plusvalías en México: el caso del municipio de Monterrey El desvanecimiento de lo popular. Gentrificación en el Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México, de Vicente Moctezuma Mendoza Accesibilidad universal e inclusión social en la implementación del programa MiBici en Guadalajara, 2014-2019 Dinámica migratoria en Risaralda, Colombia: modelo basado en agentes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1