不同碱活性水泥作为含硫酸盐土壤稳定剂的评价

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.1144/qjegh2022-057
M. Mavroulidou, C. Gray, L. Pantoja-Muñoz, M. Gunn
{"title":"不同碱活性水泥作为含硫酸盐土壤稳定剂的评价","authors":"M. Mavroulidou, C. Gray, L. Pantoja-Muñoz, M. Gunn","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The stabilization of sulphate-bearing soils with traditional calcium-based stabilisers is not recommended, as reactions between the calcium and sulphates in the presence of water could lead to soil heave. Alternative stabilization methods are therefore required, and this paper proposes innovative alkali-activated cements (AAC), whose use for soil stabilisation and especially sulphate-bearing soils is little researched. To fill this knowledge gap, AAC systems with ground granulated blastfurnace slag precursor and different alkaline activators including commercial lime, wastepaper sludge ash (PSA), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium carbonate (K\n 2\n CO\n 3\n ) were used to treat an artificial sulphate-bearing clay. AAC-treated clay specimens cured for 7 and 28 days respectively were soaked in water for 45 days; their one-dimensional swelling, unconfined compressive strength, pH, and ultrasonic pulse velocity were measured and compared to those of specimens not exposed to water. Material characterisation (SEM-EDS, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) was performed to attest cementation and detect ettringite. In AAC systems, CaO/Ca(OH)\n 2\n did not lead to specimen heave and damage and developed the highest strengths. Potassium-based activators performed less well but combined PSA-K\n 2\n CO\n 3\n led to strength gain in time. Overall AAC led to higher strengths than lime only or lime and admixtures and show promise as sulphate-bearing soil stabilisers.\n \n \n Thematic collection:\n This article is part of the Leading to Innovative Engineering Geology Practices collection available at:\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices\n","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of different alkali-activated cements as stabilisers of sulphate-bearing soils\",\"authors\":\"M. Mavroulidou, C. Gray, L. Pantoja-Muñoz, M. Gunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2022-057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The stabilization of sulphate-bearing soils with traditional calcium-based stabilisers is not recommended, as reactions between the calcium and sulphates in the presence of water could lead to soil heave. Alternative stabilization methods are therefore required, and this paper proposes innovative alkali-activated cements (AAC), whose use for soil stabilisation and especially sulphate-bearing soils is little researched. To fill this knowledge gap, AAC systems with ground granulated blastfurnace slag precursor and different alkaline activators including commercial lime, wastepaper sludge ash (PSA), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium carbonate (K\\n 2\\n CO\\n 3\\n ) were used to treat an artificial sulphate-bearing clay. AAC-treated clay specimens cured for 7 and 28 days respectively were soaked in water for 45 days; their one-dimensional swelling, unconfined compressive strength, pH, and ultrasonic pulse velocity were measured and compared to those of specimens not exposed to water. Material characterisation (SEM-EDS, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) was performed to attest cementation and detect ettringite. In AAC systems, CaO/Ca(OH)\\n 2\\n did not lead to specimen heave and damage and developed the highest strengths. Potassium-based activators performed less well but combined PSA-K\\n 2\\n CO\\n 3\\n led to strength gain in time. Overall AAC led to higher strengths than lime only or lime and admixtures and show promise as sulphate-bearing soil stabilisers.\\n \\n \\n Thematic collection:\\n This article is part of the Leading to Innovative Engineering Geology Practices collection available at:\\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不建议使用传统的钙基稳定剂来稳定含硫酸盐的土壤,因为钙和硫酸盐在水中的反应可能会导致土壤隆起。因此,需要替代的稳定方法,本文提出了创新的碱活性水泥(AAC),其用于土壤稳定,尤其是含硫酸盐土壤的研究很少。为了填补这一知识空白,使用具有磨碎的高炉矿渣前体和不同碱性活化剂(包括商用石灰、废纸污泥灰(PSA)、氢氧化钾(KOH)和碳酸钾(K2CO3))的AAC系统来处理人工含硫酸盐粘土。分别固化7天和28天的AAC处理的粘土样品在水中浸泡45天;测量了它们的一维膨胀、无侧限抗压强度、pH和超声脉冲速度,并将其与未暴露于水中的样品进行了比较。进行了材料表征(SEM-EDS、拉曼光谱和FTIR),以证明胶结作用并检测钙矾石。在AAC系统中,CaO/Ca(OH)2不会导致试样的隆起和损伤,并产生最高的强度。钾基活化剂的性能较差,但PSA-K2CO3的联合作用使强度随时间增加。总的来说,AAC比纯石灰或石灰和外加剂具有更高的强度,并有望成为含硫酸盐的土壤稳定剂。专题集:本文是“引领创新工程地质实践”系列的一部分,可在以下网站获取:https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of different alkali-activated cements as stabilisers of sulphate-bearing soils
The stabilization of sulphate-bearing soils with traditional calcium-based stabilisers is not recommended, as reactions between the calcium and sulphates in the presence of water could lead to soil heave. Alternative stabilization methods are therefore required, and this paper proposes innovative alkali-activated cements (AAC), whose use for soil stabilisation and especially sulphate-bearing soils is little researched. To fill this knowledge gap, AAC systems with ground granulated blastfurnace slag precursor and different alkaline activators including commercial lime, wastepaper sludge ash (PSA), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium carbonate (K 2 CO 3 ) were used to treat an artificial sulphate-bearing clay. AAC-treated clay specimens cured for 7 and 28 days respectively were soaked in water for 45 days; their one-dimensional swelling, unconfined compressive strength, pH, and ultrasonic pulse velocity were measured and compared to those of specimens not exposed to water. Material characterisation (SEM-EDS, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) was performed to attest cementation and detect ettringite. In AAC systems, CaO/Ca(OH) 2 did not lead to specimen heave and damage and developed the highest strengths. Potassium-based activators performed less well but combined PSA-K 2 CO 3 led to strength gain in time. Overall AAC led to higher strengths than lime only or lime and admixtures and show promise as sulphate-bearing soil stabilisers. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Leading to Innovative Engineering Geology Practices collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Managing a potential conflict between the protection of geological sites and the need to safeguard essential road infrastructure: the Coverack North Coast Protection Scheme and palaeo-Moho in Cornwall, UK What is a Geohazard? The influence of earthworks construction on pore water pressures in clays and mudstones of the Lias Group Coupling effects of stress, seepage and damage during reconstruction and excavation of abandoned deep water-rich roadways Adopting Systems Engineering Approach to a Feasibility Study of Siding Development at Midsomer Norton Station
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1