书评:展望美国和美国自我:共和党和民主党的纲领

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.1177/13540688231166072
K. Janda
{"title":"书评:展望美国和美国自我:共和党和民主党的纲领","authors":"K. Janda","doi":"10.1177/13540688231166072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"presidency. As much as anything, the volume’s approach embracing the uniqueness of Presidents, parties, and events in dictating midterm outcomes is validated by the most recent 2022 contests, in which Democrats managed something of a stalemate in a year when President Joe Biden’s approval should have dictated a bloodbath by the standards of conventional wisdom. The authors of both the initial analyses in Part 1, and of the case studies in Parts 2 and 3, offer a well-balanced acknowledgement of the power of thermostatic politics and voters’ tendency to rebel against the President’s party on the one hand, and the exigencies and complications of intervening events on the other. In total, the effort put forth inMidterms and Mandates is a worthy analytical response to the navel-gazing tendencies of modern political media and popular commentary, who with each passing election cycle seem increasingly desperate to tell a unifying, oversimplified, and often-biased “story” about midterm elections. Instead, by diving mindfully into past midterms, the analyses and case studies offered byMidterms and Mandates give us a clear roadmap for how to consider midterms of the future.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":"29 1","pages":"794 - 795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Envisioning America and the American self: Republican and democratic platforms\",\"authors\":\"K. Janda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13540688231166072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"presidency. As much as anything, the volume’s approach embracing the uniqueness of Presidents, parties, and events in dictating midterm outcomes is validated by the most recent 2022 contests, in which Democrats managed something of a stalemate in a year when President Joe Biden’s approval should have dictated a bloodbath by the standards of conventional wisdom. The authors of both the initial analyses in Part 1, and of the case studies in Parts 2 and 3, offer a well-balanced acknowledgement of the power of thermostatic politics and voters’ tendency to rebel against the President’s party on the one hand, and the exigencies and complications of intervening events on the other. In total, the effort put forth inMidterms and Mandates is a worthy analytical response to the navel-gazing tendencies of modern political media and popular commentary, who with each passing election cycle seem increasingly desperate to tell a unifying, oversimplified, and often-biased “story” about midterm elections. Instead, by diving mindfully into past midterms, the analyses and case studies offered byMidterms and Mandates give us a clear roadmap for how to consider midterms of the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Party Politics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"794 - 795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Party Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231166072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231166072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总统。最重要的是,这本书采用了总统、政党和事件在决定中期结果方面的独特性,这一点在最近的2022年竞选中得到了验证。在这一年里,民主党人成功地陷入了僵局,而按照传统智慧的标准,乔·拜登(Joe Biden)总统的批准本应导致一场大屠杀。第1部分的初步分析,以及第2部分和第3部分的案例研究的作者,一方面对恒温政治的力量和选民对总统政党的反叛倾向,以及干预事件的紧迫性和复杂性,提供了一个很好的平衡承认。总而言之,《中期选举与授权》一书的努力是对现代政治媒体和大众评论的狭隘倾向的一种值得分析的回应。随着每一个选举周期的过去,这些媒体和大众评论似乎越来越不顾一切地讲述一个关于中期选举的统一的、过于简化的、往往带有偏见的“故事”。相反,通过仔细研究过去的中期选举,《中期选举与授权》提供的分析和案例研究为我们如何考虑未来的中期选举提供了清晰的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Envisioning America and the American self: Republican and democratic platforms
presidency. As much as anything, the volume’s approach embracing the uniqueness of Presidents, parties, and events in dictating midterm outcomes is validated by the most recent 2022 contests, in which Democrats managed something of a stalemate in a year when President Joe Biden’s approval should have dictated a bloodbath by the standards of conventional wisdom. The authors of both the initial analyses in Part 1, and of the case studies in Parts 2 and 3, offer a well-balanced acknowledgement of the power of thermostatic politics and voters’ tendency to rebel against the President’s party on the one hand, and the exigencies and complications of intervening events on the other. In total, the effort put forth inMidterms and Mandates is a worthy analytical response to the navel-gazing tendencies of modern political media and popular commentary, who with each passing election cycle seem increasingly desperate to tell a unifying, oversimplified, and often-biased “story” about midterm elections. Instead, by diving mindfully into past midterms, the analyses and case studies offered byMidterms and Mandates give us a clear roadmap for how to consider midterms of the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1