T-47D细胞培养法测定A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素效价的验证

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current Pharmaceutical Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.2174/1573412919666230320155755
S. Dalmora, Bruna Xavier, Rafaela Ferreira Perobelli Dumoncel, Clóvis Dervil Appratto Cardoso Jr, F. S. da Silva
{"title":"T-47D细胞培养法测定A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素效价的验证","authors":"S. Dalmora, Bruna Xavier, Rafaela Ferreira Perobelli Dumoncel, Clóvis Dervil Appratto Cardoso Jr, F. S. da Silva","doi":"10.2174/1573412919666230320155755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBotulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are among the most potent toxins known and are also used for therapeutic and aesthetic applications.\n\n\n\nAn alternative in vitro cell culture bioassay based on the induction of apoptosis on T−47D breast cancer cells, after exposure to BoNTA, was developed and validated.\n\n\n\nThe T-47D cells (ATCC HTB−133) were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells mL−1, and the bioassay was performed with doses of BoNTA, between 3 and 81 U mL−1. The responses were assessed using 10 µL of Alamar Blue®. The absorbances were read at 570 and 600 nm.\n\n\n\nThe results were compared with those of the in vivo LD50 mouse bioassay, showing a non-significant 1.08% higher, mean difference of the estimated potencies (p>0.05). Besides, the biopharmaceutics is analyzed by the size exclusion and reversed-phase liquid chromatography methods, showing a significant correlation with values 1.15% higher and 0.85% lower, respectively, related to the cell culture bioassay.\n\n\n\nIt is concluded that the validated T−47D cell culture assay represents an advancement toward the establishment of an alternative approach for the potency assessment, in the context of the 3 Rs. Besides, the employment of chromatographic methods in conjunction with the bioassays contributes to assessing the quality attributes of the biopharmaceutical formulations of BoNTA.\n","PeriodicalId":10889,"journal":{"name":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the T–47D Cell Culture Bioassay for the Potency Assessment of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A\",\"authors\":\"S. Dalmora, Bruna Xavier, Rafaela Ferreira Perobelli Dumoncel, Clóvis Dervil Appratto Cardoso Jr, F. S. da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573412919666230320155755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nBotulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are among the most potent toxins known and are also used for therapeutic and aesthetic applications.\\n\\n\\n\\nAn alternative in vitro cell culture bioassay based on the induction of apoptosis on T−47D breast cancer cells, after exposure to BoNTA, was developed and validated.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe T-47D cells (ATCC HTB−133) were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells mL−1, and the bioassay was performed with doses of BoNTA, between 3 and 81 U mL−1. The responses were assessed using 10 µL of Alamar Blue®. The absorbances were read at 570 and 600 nm.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results were compared with those of the in vivo LD50 mouse bioassay, showing a non-significant 1.08% higher, mean difference of the estimated potencies (p>0.05). Besides, the biopharmaceutics is analyzed by the size exclusion and reversed-phase liquid chromatography methods, showing a significant correlation with values 1.15% higher and 0.85% lower, respectively, related to the cell culture bioassay.\\n\\n\\n\\nIt is concluded that the validated T−47D cell culture assay represents an advancement toward the establishment of an alternative approach for the potency assessment, in the context of the 3 Rs. Besides, the employment of chromatographic methods in conjunction with the bioassays contributes to assessing the quality attributes of the biopharmaceutical formulations of BoNTA.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573412919666230320155755\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573412919666230320155755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉毒杆菌神经毒素(bont)是已知的最有效的毒素之一,也用于治疗和美容应用。研究人员开发并验证了另一种体外细胞培养生物测定方法,该方法基于暴露于BoNTA后T - 47D乳腺癌细胞诱导凋亡。T-47D细胞(ATCC HTB−133)以3 × 105 cells mL−1的密度接种,BoNTA剂量为3 ~ 81 U mL−1进行生物测定。用10µL Alamar Blue®评价反应。在570和600 nm处测定吸光度。结果与体内LD50小鼠生物测定结果比较,估计效价的平均差异为1.08% (p < 0.05)。此外,通过尺寸排除法和反相液相色谱法对生物制药进行分析,发现与细胞培养生物测定相关的值分别高1.15%和低0.85%。结论是,经过验证的T - 47D细胞培养试验代表了在3rs背景下建立一种替代效价评估方法的进步。此外,色谱方法与生物测定相结合的使用有助于评估BoNTA生物制药配方的质量属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the T–47D Cell Culture Bioassay for the Potency Assessment of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A
Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are among the most potent toxins known and are also used for therapeutic and aesthetic applications. An alternative in vitro cell culture bioassay based on the induction of apoptosis on T−47D breast cancer cells, after exposure to BoNTA, was developed and validated. The T-47D cells (ATCC HTB−133) were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells mL−1, and the bioassay was performed with doses of BoNTA, between 3 and 81 U mL−1. The responses were assessed using 10 µL of Alamar Blue®. The absorbances were read at 570 and 600 nm. The results were compared with those of the in vivo LD50 mouse bioassay, showing a non-significant 1.08% higher, mean difference of the estimated potencies (p>0.05). Besides, the biopharmaceutics is analyzed by the size exclusion and reversed-phase liquid chromatography methods, showing a significant correlation with values 1.15% higher and 0.85% lower, respectively, related to the cell culture bioassay. It is concluded that the validated T−47D cell culture assay represents an advancement toward the establishment of an alternative approach for the potency assessment, in the context of the 3 Rs. Besides, the employment of chromatographic methods in conjunction with the bioassays contributes to assessing the quality attributes of the biopharmaceutical formulations of BoNTA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Pharmaceutical Analysis publishes expert reviews and original research articles on all the most recent advances in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. All aspects of the field are represented including drug analysis, analytical methodology and instrumentation. The journal is essential to all involved in pharmaceutical, biochemical and clinical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous Estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine Used to Treat Nerve Pain by Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Using the QBD Approach Research on Compatibility of Packaging Materials of High-Risk Cephalosporin Powder Injection and Establishment of Indicator Component Evaluation Method Universally Applicable Methods for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Elemental Impurities in Vitamin A and D Preparations An Overview of Biotechnological Drug’s Various Techniques of Downstream Process, Guideline’s And Different Chromatographic Analysis Validation of GF-AAS Method for the Determination of Aluminium Content in Human Albumin Finished Product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1