Morris Hamilton, Mary Juergens, Qing Zheng, Elizabeth Campbell, M. Plotzke
{"title":"家庭输液治疗:在医疗保险B部分临时过渡支付下的使用","authors":"Morris Hamilton, Mary Juergens, Qing Zheng, Elizabeth Campbell, M. Plotzke","doi":"10.1177/10848223221079630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 20181 created a temporary transitional payment (TTP) through Medicare Part B, which establishes fee-for-service (FFS) payment for eligible home infusion suppliers when they furnish home infusion therapy (HIT) service visits by skilled professionals in a beneficiary’s home on the day of HIT drug administration. Payment varies by 3 condition-specific payment categories. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the TTP on January 1, 2019. The TTP ended when the permanent HIT benefit began on January 1, 2021. To better understand how beneficiaries utilized this benefit during the TTP period, we examine trends in HIT services utilization between January 2019 and December 2020. Despite being new, the HIT benefit showed only a slight ramp-up phase, with a stable level of visits evolving over the remainder of 2019 and early 2020. Utilization decreased during the COVID-19 public health emergency, especially for infusion drugs related to heart failure and cancer. Additionally, relative to the geographic distribution of the Medicare FFS population, HIT service visit users are concentrated in the mid-Atlantic states. HIT service visit users are more likely to be young, white or black, and urban dwelling, compared to the general Medicare FFS beneficiaries.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home Infusion Therapy: Utilization Under the Medicare Part B Temporary Transitional Payment\",\"authors\":\"Morris Hamilton, Mary Juergens, Qing Zheng, Elizabeth Campbell, M. Plotzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10848223221079630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 20181 created a temporary transitional payment (TTP) through Medicare Part B, which establishes fee-for-service (FFS) payment for eligible home infusion suppliers when they furnish home infusion therapy (HIT) service visits by skilled professionals in a beneficiary’s home on the day of HIT drug administration. Payment varies by 3 condition-specific payment categories. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the TTP on January 1, 2019. The TTP ended when the permanent HIT benefit began on January 1, 2021. To better understand how beneficiaries utilized this benefit during the TTP period, we examine trends in HIT services utilization between January 2019 and December 2020. Despite being new, the HIT benefit showed only a slight ramp-up phase, with a stable level of visits evolving over the remainder of 2019 and early 2020. Utilization decreased during the COVID-19 public health emergency, especially for infusion drugs related to heart failure and cancer. Additionally, relative to the geographic distribution of the Medicare FFS population, HIT service visit users are concentrated in the mid-Atlantic states. HIT service visit users are more likely to be young, white or black, and urban dwelling, compared to the general Medicare FFS beneficiaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221079630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221079630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Home Infusion Therapy: Utilization Under the Medicare Part B Temporary Transitional Payment
The Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 20181 created a temporary transitional payment (TTP) through Medicare Part B, which establishes fee-for-service (FFS) payment for eligible home infusion suppliers when they furnish home infusion therapy (HIT) service visits by skilled professionals in a beneficiary’s home on the day of HIT drug administration. Payment varies by 3 condition-specific payment categories. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the TTP on January 1, 2019. The TTP ended when the permanent HIT benefit began on January 1, 2021. To better understand how beneficiaries utilized this benefit during the TTP period, we examine trends in HIT services utilization between January 2019 and December 2020. Despite being new, the HIT benefit showed only a slight ramp-up phase, with a stable level of visits evolving over the remainder of 2019 and early 2020. Utilization decreased during the COVID-19 public health emergency, especially for infusion drugs related to heart failure and cancer. Additionally, relative to the geographic distribution of the Medicare FFS population, HIT service visit users are concentrated in the mid-Atlantic states. HIT service visit users are more likely to be young, white or black, and urban dwelling, compared to the general Medicare FFS beneficiaries.
期刊介绍:
Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.