使用抗菌引物Denteshield®提高正畸托槽的粘结强度

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australasian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2478/aoj-2023.0009
Craig Murphy, Xiaoming Xu, Q. Yu, P. Armbruster, Richard W Ballard
{"title":"使用抗菌引物Denteshield®提高正畸托槽的粘结强度","authors":"Craig Murphy, Xiaoming Xu, Q. Yu, P. Armbruster, Richard W Ballard","doi":"10.2478/aoj-2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim: This study examined the bond strength associated with Denteshield® Primer as a replacement for a conventional, non-antimicrobial, orthodontic primer. Materials/methods: Sixty human premolar teeth were divided into three groups (n=20). Each group was assigned to receive either Denteshield®, Pro Seal® or Transbond XT TM primer. Light-cured Transbond XTTM adhesive resin was utilised to bond a bracket to each sample tooth following the application of the assigned primer. Ten samples from each group were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The remaining 10 samples from each group underwent bracket debonding using a debonding plier. Applying an adhesive remnant index, each sample was scored under a microscope at 2.5× magnification. The data were analysed using One-way ANOVA, the Tukey post hoc test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The mean shear bond strength (MPa) of the three groups was: Denteshield® (33.18 ± 13.56), Pro Seal® (23.68 ± 12.04) and Transbond XTTM primer (26.19 ± 9.44). There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength across all three groups (p = 0.19). The adhesive remnant index results also showed no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.278). Conclusion: Based on the shear bond strengths obtained in this study and the previously reported values necessary for clinical use, all three primers appear adequate for clinical use. (Aust Orthod J 2022; 39: 49 - 54. DOI: 10.2478/aoj-2023-0009)","PeriodicalId":48559,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using the anti-bacterial primer, Denteshield®\",\"authors\":\"Craig Murphy, Xiaoming Xu, Q. Yu, P. Armbruster, Richard W Ballard\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aoj-2023.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aim: This study examined the bond strength associated with Denteshield® Primer as a replacement for a conventional, non-antimicrobial, orthodontic primer. Materials/methods: Sixty human premolar teeth were divided into three groups (n=20). Each group was assigned to receive either Denteshield®, Pro Seal® or Transbond XT TM primer. Light-cured Transbond XTTM adhesive resin was utilised to bond a bracket to each sample tooth following the application of the assigned primer. Ten samples from each group were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The remaining 10 samples from each group underwent bracket debonding using a debonding plier. Applying an adhesive remnant index, each sample was scored under a microscope at 2.5× magnification. The data were analysed using One-way ANOVA, the Tukey post hoc test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The mean shear bond strength (MPa) of the three groups was: Denteshield® (33.18 ± 13.56), Pro Seal® (23.68 ± 12.04) and Transbond XTTM primer (26.19 ± 9.44). There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength across all three groups (p = 0.19). The adhesive remnant index results also showed no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.278). Conclusion: Based on the shear bond strengths obtained in this study and the previously reported values necessary for clinical use, all three primers appear adequate for clinical use. (Aust Orthod J 2022; 39: 49 - 54. DOI: 10.2478/aoj-2023-0009)\",\"PeriodicalId\":48559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023.0009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023.0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究考察了Denteshield®Primer作为传统的、非抗菌的正畸引物的替代品的结合强度。材料/方法:60颗人前磨牙分为3组(n=20)。每组分别接受Denteshield®、Pro Seal®或Transbond XT TM引物。使用光固化的Transbond XTTM粘接树脂将托架粘接到每个样品牙齿上,然后使用指定的底漆。每组各取10个样品,使用万能试验机进行剪切粘结强度测试。每组其余10个样本使用脱粘钳对支架进行脱粘。在2.5倍放大镜下,应用黏合剂残余指数对每个样品进行评分。采用单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。结果:三组引物的平均剪切结合强度(MPa)分别为:Denteshield®(33.18±13.56)、Pro Seal®(23.68±12.04)和Transbond XTTM引物(26.19±9.44)。三组间剪切粘接强度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.19)。粘接剂残留指数在三组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.278)。结论:根据本研究获得的剪切结合强度和先前报道的临床使用所需值,所有三种引物都适合临床使用。(中华骨科杂志,2022;[39]: 49 - 54。DOI: 10.2478 / aoj - 2023 - 0009)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using the anti-bacterial primer, Denteshield®
Abstract Aim: This study examined the bond strength associated with Denteshield® Primer as a replacement for a conventional, non-antimicrobial, orthodontic primer. Materials/methods: Sixty human premolar teeth were divided into three groups (n=20). Each group was assigned to receive either Denteshield®, Pro Seal® or Transbond XT TM primer. Light-cured Transbond XTTM adhesive resin was utilised to bond a bracket to each sample tooth following the application of the assigned primer. Ten samples from each group were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The remaining 10 samples from each group underwent bracket debonding using a debonding plier. Applying an adhesive remnant index, each sample was scored under a microscope at 2.5× magnification. The data were analysed using One-way ANOVA, the Tukey post hoc test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The mean shear bond strength (MPa) of the three groups was: Denteshield® (33.18 ± 13.56), Pro Seal® (23.68 ± 12.04) and Transbond XTTM primer (26.19 ± 9.44). There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength across all three groups (p = 0.19). The adhesive remnant index results also showed no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.278). Conclusion: Based on the shear bond strengths obtained in this study and the previously reported values necessary for clinical use, all three primers appear adequate for clinical use. (Aust Orthod J 2022; 39: 49 - 54. DOI: 10.2478/aoj-2023-0009)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Orthodontic Journal
Australasian Orthodontic Journal Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Orthodontic Journal (AOJ) is the official scientific publication of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Previously titled the Australian Orthodontic Journal, the name of the publication was changed in 2017 to provide the region with additional representation because of a substantial increase in the number of submitted overseas'' manuscripts. The volume and issue numbers continue in sequence and only the ISSN numbers have been updated. The AOJ publishes original research papers, clinical reports, book reviews, abstracts from other journals, and other material which is of interest to orthodontists and is in the interest of their continuing education. It is published twice a year in November and May. The AOJ is indexed and abstracted by Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
期刊最新文献
Discrepancy index, treatment complexity index and objective Grading system: correlation between parameters, indices and implications for treatment ChatGPT in orthodontics: limitations and possibilities Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia Multidimensional tooth movement boundaries in the extended aesthetic zone: a cone-beam computed tomography study Efficacy of in-house clear aligner therapy mechanics on root torque: an in-vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1