{"title":"美学否定与引用:列维纳斯、阿格农与文学悖论","authors":"L. Harvey","doi":"10.1080/17570638.2021.1975762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prima facie, the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas would seem to be inherently averse to literature as an ethical mode. Indeed, in his early work, up to and including Totality and Infinity (1961), literary art is often censured with what amounts to Platonic zeal. However, as I will demonstrate, this criticism stands alongside what is seemingly an incongruous use of literary art as a means of ethical exemplification. By exploring this tension, I will show how the contra-epistemic aesthetic of S. Y. Agnon (1888–1970) can be read within ethical terms consistent with Levinas’s philosophical position.","PeriodicalId":10599,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","volume":"13 1","pages":"114 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aesthetic Negation and Citation: Levinas, Agnon and the Paradox of Literature\",\"authors\":\"L. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17570638.2021.1975762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Prima facie, the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas would seem to be inherently averse to literature as an ethical mode. Indeed, in his early work, up to and including Totality and Infinity (1961), literary art is often censured with what amounts to Platonic zeal. However, as I will demonstrate, this criticism stands alongside what is seemingly an incongruous use of literary art as a means of ethical exemplification. By exploring this tension, I will show how the contra-epistemic aesthetic of S. Y. Agnon (1888–1970) can be read within ethical terms consistent with Levinas’s philosophical position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative and Continental Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative and Continental Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2021.1975762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2021.1975762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从表面上看,伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的哲学似乎天生就反对将文学作为一种伦理模式。的确,在他的早期作品中,直到并包括《总体性与无限》(1961),文学艺术经常受到柏拉图式热情的谴责。然而,正如我将证明的那样,这种批评与文学艺术作为道德例证手段的看似不协调的使用是一致的。通过探索这种张力,我将展示如何在与列维纳斯的哲学立场一致的伦理术语中阅读S. Y. Agnon(1888-1970)的反认知美学。
Aesthetic Negation and Citation: Levinas, Agnon and the Paradox of Literature
ABSTRACT Prima facie, the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas would seem to be inherently averse to literature as an ethical mode. Indeed, in his early work, up to and including Totality and Infinity (1961), literary art is often censured with what amounts to Platonic zeal. However, as I will demonstrate, this criticism stands alongside what is seemingly an incongruous use of literary art as a means of ethical exemplification. By exploring this tension, I will show how the contra-epistemic aesthetic of S. Y. Agnon (1888–1970) can be read within ethical terms consistent with Levinas’s philosophical position.