{"title":"医院区域化政策对治疗费用的影响:系统文献综述","authors":"S. Hekmat, Ali Sadatmoosavi, Z. Zare","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2021.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic literature review and meta-synthesis aimed to explore the impact of regionalisation of hospital services on healthcare costs. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies, with no limits based on year of publication or country. Search terms included the key words ‘regionalisation’, ‘hospital’ and ‘cost’, along with related terms. Of the 310 identified studies, 37 were included in the final review. A meta-synthesis was carried out to assess the primary outcome measure of costs in regional hospitals, as well as the secondary outcome measures of patient mortality rates, length of stay and accessibility. A total of 28 studies suggested that regional hospitals had lower long-term costs than non-regional hospitals, largely because of the skills and experience of the clinical teams, as well as investment in specialist medical equipment. Other identified benefits were reduced length of stay and lower patient mortality rates. However, some studies indicated that regionalisation did not entirely eliminate problems relating to patient access, with implications for further study and policy considerations.","PeriodicalId":35342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of hospital regionalisation policies on treatment costs: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"S. Hekmat, Ali Sadatmoosavi, Z. Zare\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjhc.2021.0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic literature review and meta-synthesis aimed to explore the impact of regionalisation of hospital services on healthcare costs. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies, with no limits based on year of publication or country. Search terms included the key words ‘regionalisation’, ‘hospital’ and ‘cost’, along with related terms. Of the 310 identified studies, 37 were included in the final review. A meta-synthesis was carried out to assess the primary outcome measure of costs in regional hospitals, as well as the secondary outcome measures of patient mortality rates, length of stay and accessibility. A total of 28 studies suggested that regional hospitals had lower long-term costs than non-regional hospitals, largely because of the skills and experience of the clinical teams, as well as investment in specialist medical equipment. Other identified benefits were reduced length of stay and lower patient mortality rates. However, some studies indicated that regionalisation did not entirely eliminate problems relating to patient access, with implications for further study and policy considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Care Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Care Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统的文献综述和元综合旨在探讨医院服务区域化对医疗保健成本的影响。作者检索了PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、EBSCO、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,以确定相关研究,没有基于出版年份或国家的限制。搜索词包括关键词“区域化”、“医院”和“成本”,以及相关术语。在确定的310项研究中,有37项纳入了最终审查。进行了一项综合评估,以评估区域医院成本的主要结果指标,以及患者死亡率、住院时间和可及性的次要结果指标。共有28项研究表明,区域医院的长期费用低于非区域医院,这主要是由于临床团队的技能和经验,以及对专业医疗设备的投资。其他确定的好处是缩短住院时间和降低患者死亡率。然而,一些研究表明,区域化并没有完全消除与患者获取有关的问题,这意味着需要进一步的研究和政策考虑。
The impact of hospital regionalisation policies on treatment costs: a systematic literature review
This systematic literature review and meta-synthesis aimed to explore the impact of regionalisation of hospital services on healthcare costs. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies, with no limits based on year of publication or country. Search terms included the key words ‘regionalisation’, ‘hospital’ and ‘cost’, along with related terms. Of the 310 identified studies, 37 were included in the final review. A meta-synthesis was carried out to assess the primary outcome measure of costs in regional hospitals, as well as the secondary outcome measures of patient mortality rates, length of stay and accessibility. A total of 28 studies suggested that regional hospitals had lower long-term costs than non-regional hospitals, largely because of the skills and experience of the clinical teams, as well as investment in specialist medical equipment. Other identified benefits were reduced length of stay and lower patient mortality rates. However, some studies indicated that regionalisation did not entirely eliminate problems relating to patient access, with implications for further study and policy considerations.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Healthcare Management (BJHCM) is the independent monthly journal which is essential reading for all health service managers, policymakers, influencers and commentators. Launched in 1995, BJHCM mixes peer-reviewed management articles with interviews, analysis and comment to bring you a sharp, topical and valuable insight into what"s happening in and around the NHS. To reflect the way that the NHS is changing, the journal has recently received a major face-lift and several new features now appear alongside BJHCM"s excellent state-of-the-art review articles and celebrated columnists.