智力资本的计量:组织实践的适用模型分析

IF 0.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT Revista ENIAC Pesquisa Pub Date : 2020-01-29 DOI:10.22567/rep.v9i1.562
A. Feil
{"title":"智力资本的计量:组织实践的适用模型分析","authors":"A. Feil","doi":"10.22567/rep.v9i1.562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge, at the present time, is an essential element that contributes in the generation of competitive advantages and riches to the organizations. In this context, this study aims to identify and measure intellectual capital by the appropriate method to the civil construction organization and related activities. The methodology focuses on the quali-quantitative and descriptive approach, with the aid of documentary research and unstructured interviewing. The analysis unit comprises an industry and trade in materials, mortar for construction and asphalt roads, known as Alfa. The models of intellectual capital used in this study, based on the limitations of information available in the organization, include the market capitalization methods (Market-to-book Ratio, Tobin's q and the scorecard methods (intellectus, Skandia Navigator and Stewart). The results show that market capitalization methods are quick and simple to evaluate, because of this they are inexact and inefficient; and the scorecard methods are complex and slow for the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital, but they cover greater breadth and depth. In this sense, it is concluded that the most appropriate method for the measurement and analysis of intellectual capital in Alfa is Skandia Navigator, since it covers a set of indicators and its result presents absolute values and reason that aid in the process of internal and external management.","PeriodicalId":40421,"journal":{"name":"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa","volume":"9 1","pages":"15-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mensuração do Capital Intelectual: análise do modelo adequado à Práxis Organizacional\",\"authors\":\"A. Feil\",\"doi\":\"10.22567/rep.v9i1.562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge, at the present time, is an essential element that contributes in the generation of competitive advantages and riches to the organizations. In this context, this study aims to identify and measure intellectual capital by the appropriate method to the civil construction organization and related activities. The methodology focuses on the quali-quantitative and descriptive approach, with the aid of documentary research and unstructured interviewing. The analysis unit comprises an industry and trade in materials, mortar for construction and asphalt roads, known as Alfa. The models of intellectual capital used in this study, based on the limitations of information available in the organization, include the market capitalization methods (Market-to-book Ratio, Tobin's q and the scorecard methods (intellectus, Skandia Navigator and Stewart). The results show that market capitalization methods are quick and simple to evaluate, because of this they are inexact and inefficient; and the scorecard methods are complex and slow for the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital, but they cover greater breadth and depth. In this sense, it is concluded that the most appropriate method for the measurement and analysis of intellectual capital in Alfa is Skandia Navigator, since it covers a set of indicators and its result presents absolute values and reason that aid in the process of internal and external management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"15-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22567/rep.v9i1.562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22567/rep.v9i1.562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今时代,知识是为组织创造竞争优势和财富的基本要素。在此背景下,本研究旨在通过适当的方法识别和测量土木建筑组织及其相关活动的智力资本。方法侧重于定性定量和描述性的方法,借助文献研究和非结构化访谈。该分析单位包括材料、建筑砂浆和沥青道路的工业和贸易,被称为阿尔法。基于组织中可用信息的局限性,本研究中使用的智力资本模型包括市值法(市净率,托宾q)和记分卡法(intellectus, Skandia Navigator和Stewart)。结果表明,市场资本化方法的评估速度快、操作简单,但存在不精确和效率低下的问题;而计分卡方法对智力资本的测量和评价较为复杂和缓慢,但涵盖的广度和深度较大。从这个意义上说,我们得出结论,对于Alfa的智力资本的测量和分析最合适的方法是Skandia Navigator,因为它涵盖了一套指标,其结果呈现出有助于内部和外部管理过程的绝对值和原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A mensuração do Capital Intelectual: análise do modelo adequado à Práxis Organizacional
Knowledge, at the present time, is an essential element that contributes in the generation of competitive advantages and riches to the organizations. In this context, this study aims to identify and measure intellectual capital by the appropriate method to the civil construction organization and related activities. The methodology focuses on the quali-quantitative and descriptive approach, with the aid of documentary research and unstructured interviewing. The analysis unit comprises an industry and trade in materials, mortar for construction and asphalt roads, known as Alfa. The models of intellectual capital used in this study, based on the limitations of information available in the organization, include the market capitalization methods (Market-to-book Ratio, Tobin's q and the scorecard methods (intellectus, Skandia Navigator and Stewart). The results show that market capitalization methods are quick and simple to evaluate, because of this they are inexact and inefficient; and the scorecard methods are complex and slow for the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital, but they cover greater breadth and depth. In this sense, it is concluded that the most appropriate method for the measurement and analysis of intellectual capital in Alfa is Skandia Navigator, since it covers a set of indicators and its result presents absolute values and reason that aid in the process of internal and external management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dimensões da Competência em Tecnologia da Informação em Empresas Tecnológicas Brasileiras Deficiencias contables en las microempresas en Colombia: Un estudio de caso Políticas educacionais e a adaptação de estudantes indígenas ao Ensino Remoto de Emergência: Análise do perfil dos contribuintes e as variáveis intervenientes da declaração de imposto de renda pessoa física do Vale do Taquari - RS diversos métodos de avaliação de empresa e o fluxo de caixa descontado nos casos de apuração de haveres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1