阿拉斯加西南部岩石圈短周期s波衰减场的非均质性填图

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Seismic Instruments Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.3103/S0747923922070064
Yu. F. Kopnichev, I. N. Sokolova
{"title":"阿拉斯加西南部岩石圈短周期s波衰减场的非均质性填图","authors":"Yu. F. Kopnichev,&nbsp;I. N. Sokolova","doi":"10.3103/S0747923922070064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The authors have studied the characteristics of the short-period <i>S</i>-wave attenuation field in the lithosphere of southwest Alaska (in the Alaska subduction zone). Records of seismic station KDAK, obtained for shallow earthquakes within the distance range of ~250–750 km, were processed. We used a method that analyzes the ratio of maximum amplitudes in <i>Sn</i> and <i>Pn</i> waves (parameter <i>Sn</i>/<i>Pn</i>). The correlation dependence of this parameter on distance for wave lines crossing rupture zones of three large and great earthquakes is plotted: the Great Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 9.2), the Simeonov earthquake of July 22, 2020 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 7.8), and Chignik earthquake of July 29, 2021 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 8.2). It was established that this dependence goes a little higher than similar dependences obtained earlier for regions of southwest Japan and central Chile, and much higher than for the region of northeast Japan. The reasons for the substantial differences of these dependences in different regions are discussed. The authors consider heterogeneities of the attenuation field in the rupture zones of the Simeonov earthquake and its largest aftershock (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 7.6), as well as of the Chignik earthquake.</p>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Heterogeneities of the Short-Period S-Wave Attenuation Field in the Lithosphere of Southwest Alaska\",\"authors\":\"Yu. F. Kopnichev,&nbsp;I. N. Sokolova\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/S0747923922070064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The authors have studied the characteristics of the short-period <i>S</i>-wave attenuation field in the lithosphere of southwest Alaska (in the Alaska subduction zone). Records of seismic station KDAK, obtained for shallow earthquakes within the distance range of ~250–750 km, were processed. We used a method that analyzes the ratio of maximum amplitudes in <i>Sn</i> and <i>Pn</i> waves (parameter <i>Sn</i>/<i>Pn</i>). The correlation dependence of this parameter on distance for wave lines crossing rupture zones of three large and great earthquakes is plotted: the Great Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 9.2), the Simeonov earthquake of July 22, 2020 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 7.8), and Chignik earthquake of July 29, 2021 (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 8.2). It was established that this dependence goes a little higher than similar dependences obtained earlier for regions of southwest Japan and central Chile, and much higher than for the region of northeast Japan. The reasons for the substantial differences of these dependences in different regions are discussed. The authors consider heterogeneities of the attenuation field in the rupture zones of the Simeonov earthquake and its largest aftershock (<i>M</i><sub><i>W</i></sub> = 7.6), as well as of the Chignik earthquake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seismic Instruments\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seismic Instruments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923922070064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923922070064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了阿拉斯加西南部(阿拉斯加俯冲带)岩石圈短周期s波衰减场的特征。对KDAK台站在~250 ~ 750 km范围内的浅层地震记录进行了处理。我们使用了一种分析Sn波和Pn波最大振幅之比的方法(参数Sn/Pn)。绘制了三次大地震(1964年3月28日阿拉斯加大地震(MW = 9.2)、2020年7月22日Simeonov地震(MW = 7.8)和2021年7月29日Chignik地震(MW = 8.2))中该参数与穿越破裂带的波线距离的相关关系。研究发现,这种依赖程度略高于之前日本西南部和智利中部地区的类似依赖程度,而远高于日本东北部地区。讨论了这些依赖在不同地区存在重大差异的原因。作者考虑了Simeonov地震及其最大余震(MW = 7.6)和Chignik地震破裂带衰减场的非均质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping Heterogeneities of the Short-Period S-Wave Attenuation Field in the Lithosphere of Southwest Alaska

The authors have studied the characteristics of the short-period S-wave attenuation field in the lithosphere of southwest Alaska (in the Alaska subduction zone). Records of seismic station KDAK, obtained for shallow earthquakes within the distance range of ~250–750 km, were processed. We used a method that analyzes the ratio of maximum amplitudes in Sn and Pn waves (parameter Sn/Pn). The correlation dependence of this parameter on distance for wave lines crossing rupture zones of three large and great earthquakes is plotted: the Great Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964 (MW = 9.2), the Simeonov earthquake of July 22, 2020 (MW = 7.8), and Chignik earthquake of July 29, 2021 (MW = 8.2). It was established that this dependence goes a little higher than similar dependences obtained earlier for regions of southwest Japan and central Chile, and much higher than for the region of northeast Japan. The reasons for the substantial differences of these dependences in different regions are discussed. The authors consider heterogeneities of the attenuation field in the rupture zones of the Simeonov earthquake and its largest aftershock (MW = 7.6), as well as of the Chignik earthquake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seismic Instruments
Seismic Instruments GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
44.40%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Recording Capabilities of the Kolba Seismic Station for Seismic Monitoring in the Western Sector of the Russian Arctic Precision Solution of the VES Inverse Problem for Experimental Data of Long-Term Monitoring of the Earth’s Crust Estimating the Error in Solving the Inverse VES Problem for Precision Investigations of Time Variations in a Geoelectric Section with a Strong Seasonal Effect Neotectonic Stress State of the Chuya–Kurai Depression and Adjacent Structures (Southeastern Altai Mountains) Spectral Content of Acoustic Signals of Artificial Sandstone Samples under Uniaxial Loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1