机会亚科的复杂分类学:花形态计量学对机会亚种的鉴别有必要吗?

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Botany Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1139/cjb-2022-0133
Aldanelly Galicia-Pérez, J. Golubov, Gerardo Manzanarez-Villasana, Linda Mariana Martínez-Ramos, S. Arias, J. Márquez-Guzmán, M. Mandujano
{"title":"机会亚科的复杂分类学:花形态计量学对机会亚种的鉴别有必要吗?","authors":"Aldanelly Galicia-Pérez, J. Golubov, Gerardo Manzanarez-Villasana, Linda Mariana Martínez-Ramos, S. Arias, J. Márquez-Guzmán, M. Mandujano","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2022-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correct species identification is critical for studies on biodiversity, ecology, and conservation. Determining Opuntia s.s. species is difficult because they have similar traits and are phenotypically plastic. Taxonomic keys are based on vegetative traits, rather than reproductive ones such as flowers, because they are assumed to be too similar. We analyzed morphometric characteristics of flowers and cladodes over 6 years to determine which of these is most useful for differentiating Opuntia species from the Chihuahuan Desert. For each species (Opuntia robusta, O. cantabrigiensis, O. tomentosa, and O. streptacantha),we tagged 20 hermaphroditic and 40 dioecious plants (totaling 100) from 2014-2020, to complete the sample size of flowers and cladodes. Seventeen morphometric characters were measured for new cladodes and 15 for flowers, and discriminant analysis was applied to determine which traits enabled species delimitation. Six of the 17 cladode characteristics combined explained 89% of the variation, while nine floral characteristics combined explained 94% of the variation. Floral morphometrics proved to be very useful to accurately differentiate species and should be included, in addition to cladodes, in future taxonomic studies. Here, we provide the first taxonomic key that includes floral traits to identify Opuntia and a new description of each studied species.","PeriodicalId":9092,"journal":{"name":"Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPLEX TAXONOMY IN OPUNTIOIDEAE: IS FLORAL MORPHOMETRY ESSENTIAL TO IDENTIFY OPUNTIA SPECIES?\",\"authors\":\"Aldanelly Galicia-Pérez, J. Golubov, Gerardo Manzanarez-Villasana, Linda Mariana Martínez-Ramos, S. Arias, J. Márquez-Guzmán, M. Mandujano\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjb-2022-0133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correct species identification is critical for studies on biodiversity, ecology, and conservation. Determining Opuntia s.s. species is difficult because they have similar traits and are phenotypically plastic. Taxonomic keys are based on vegetative traits, rather than reproductive ones such as flowers, because they are assumed to be too similar. We analyzed morphometric characteristics of flowers and cladodes over 6 years to determine which of these is most useful for differentiating Opuntia species from the Chihuahuan Desert. For each species (Opuntia robusta, O. cantabrigiensis, O. tomentosa, and O. streptacantha),we tagged 20 hermaphroditic and 40 dioecious plants (totaling 100) from 2014-2020, to complete the sample size of flowers and cladodes. Seventeen morphometric characters were measured for new cladodes and 15 for flowers, and discriminant analysis was applied to determine which traits enabled species delimitation. Six of the 17 cladode characteristics combined explained 89% of the variation, while nine floral characteristics combined explained 94% of the variation. Floral morphometrics proved to be very useful to accurately differentiate species and should be included, in addition to cladodes, in future taxonomic studies. Here, we provide the first taxonomic key that includes floral traits to identify Opuntia and a new description of each studied species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2022-0133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2022-0133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正确的物种识别对于生物多样性、生态学和保护研究至关重要。确定仙人掌属物种很困难,因为它们具有相似的特征,并且具有表型可塑性。分类键基于营养性状,而不是繁殖性状,如花朵,因为它们被认为过于相似。我们分析了6年来花和分支的形态计量学特征,以确定其中哪一种最有助于区分吉娃娃沙漠中的仙人掌物种。从2014-2020年,我们对每个物种(粗壮仙人掌、坎塔布里吉仙人掌、绒毛仙人掌和Streptacanta仙人掌)标记了20种雌雄同体和40种雌雄异株植物(共100种),以完成花朵和分支的样本量。测量了17个新分支的形态计量特征和15个花的形态计量特性,并应用判别分析来确定哪些特征能够进行物种划分。17个枝序特征中的6个组合解释了89%的变异,而9个花特征组合解释了94%的变异。花形态计量学被证明对准确区分物种非常有用,在未来的分类学研究中,除了枝序外,还应该包括在内。在这里,我们提供了第一个包括花特征的分类钥匙,以识别仙人掌,并对每个研究物种进行了新的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPLEX TAXONOMY IN OPUNTIOIDEAE: IS FLORAL MORPHOMETRY ESSENTIAL TO IDENTIFY OPUNTIA SPECIES?
Correct species identification is critical for studies on biodiversity, ecology, and conservation. Determining Opuntia s.s. species is difficult because they have similar traits and are phenotypically plastic. Taxonomic keys are based on vegetative traits, rather than reproductive ones such as flowers, because they are assumed to be too similar. We analyzed morphometric characteristics of flowers and cladodes over 6 years to determine which of these is most useful for differentiating Opuntia species from the Chihuahuan Desert. For each species (Opuntia robusta, O. cantabrigiensis, O. tomentosa, and O. streptacantha),we tagged 20 hermaphroditic and 40 dioecious plants (totaling 100) from 2014-2020, to complete the sample size of flowers and cladodes. Seventeen morphometric characters were measured for new cladodes and 15 for flowers, and discriminant analysis was applied to determine which traits enabled species delimitation. Six of the 17 cladode characteristics combined explained 89% of the variation, while nine floral characteristics combined explained 94% of the variation. Floral morphometrics proved to be very useful to accurately differentiate species and should be included, in addition to cladodes, in future taxonomic studies. Here, we provide the first taxonomic key that includes floral traits to identify Opuntia and a new description of each studied species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Botany
Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Botany features comprehensive research articles and notes in all segments of plant sciences, including cell and molecular biology, ecology, mycology and plant-microbe interactions, phycology, physiology and biochemistry, structure and development, genetics, systematics, and phytogeography. It also publishes methods, commentary, and review articles on topics of current interest, contributed by internationally recognized scientists.
期刊最新文献
Four new species of Albomagister (Agaricales) from eastern North America The Meadoway: native meadow creation in underutilized transmission line corridors Do nurse plants and cattle exclusion help restore Parlatore’s Podocarp forest? Observations on the curvature of Physcomitrium patens (Hedw.) Mitt. and Funaria hygrometrica (Hedw.) caulonemal filaments 基于BP神经网络算法的延胡索农药减施增效技术研究
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1