布法罗脑震荡跑步机试验和布法罗脑震荡自行车试验的临床应用:系统综述

Ayden Janssen, R. Pope, N. Rando
{"title":"布法罗脑震荡跑步机试验和布法罗脑震荡自行车试验的临床应用:系统综述","authors":"Ayden Janssen, R. Pope, N. Rando","doi":"10.1177/20597002221127551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To identify and synthesise research evidence regarding psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) and Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT) for use with patients with acute concussion, post-concussion syndrome (PCS) or physiological post-concussion disorder (PPCD). Data sources ProQuest (ProQuest Central), PEDro, Medline (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), EBSCOhost (Health collection) and Google Scholar, searched September 8th-12th, 2020. Study selection Two authors independently selected studies that met eligibility criteria. Studies were selected if they were original research of any design, that investigated the properties of the testing protocols in either concussed or uninjured participants. Articles not published in English, that were not original research or that used significantly different testing protocols were excluded. The search yielded 250 articles, 11 of which were eligible and included in this review. Data extraction Included studies were critically appraised independently by two authors, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data relating to study characteristics and key findings were extracted from the studies, documented in tables, and used to inform a critical narrative synthesis of findings. Data synthesis To provide recommendations relating to each aim of the review, a strength of evidence scoring system was used. Available evidence supported use of the BCTT, with strong evidence supporting the safety and construct validity of the test and moderate evidence supporting its prognostic value. There has been very limited research investigating use of the BCBT. Conclusion The findings support a recommendation for use of the BCTT in clinical settings for management of acute concussion, PCS and PPCD. There is limited evidence available for the BCBT. Additional studies are needed of both tests to further establish their clinical value.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test and the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Ayden Janssen, R. Pope, N. Rando\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20597002221127551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To identify and synthesise research evidence regarding psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) and Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT) for use with patients with acute concussion, post-concussion syndrome (PCS) or physiological post-concussion disorder (PPCD). Data sources ProQuest (ProQuest Central), PEDro, Medline (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), EBSCOhost (Health collection) and Google Scholar, searched September 8th-12th, 2020. Study selection Two authors independently selected studies that met eligibility criteria. Studies were selected if they were original research of any design, that investigated the properties of the testing protocols in either concussed or uninjured participants. Articles not published in English, that were not original research or that used significantly different testing protocols were excluded. The search yielded 250 articles, 11 of which were eligible and included in this review. Data extraction Included studies were critically appraised independently by two authors, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data relating to study characteristics and key findings were extracted from the studies, documented in tables, and used to inform a critical narrative synthesis of findings. Data synthesis To provide recommendations relating to each aim of the review, a strength of evidence scoring system was used. Available evidence supported use of the BCTT, with strong evidence supporting the safety and construct validity of the test and moderate evidence supporting its prognostic value. There has been very limited research investigating use of the BCBT. Conclusion The findings support a recommendation for use of the BCTT in clinical settings for management of acute concussion, PCS and PPCD. There is limited evidence available for the BCBT. Additional studies are needed of both tests to further establish their clinical value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of concussion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of concussion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002221127551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002221127551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对布法罗脑震荡踏车试验(BCTT)和布法罗脑震荡自行车试验(BCBT)在急性脑震荡、脑震荡后综合征(PCS)和生理性脑震荡后障碍(PPCD)患者中的心理测量特性和临床应用进行研究和综合。数据来源:ProQuest (ProQuest Central)、PEDro、Medline (Ovid)、Emcare (Ovid)、EBSCOhost (Health collection)和谷歌Scholar,检索日期:2020年9月8日-12日。研究选择两位作者独立选择了符合资格标准的研究。研究被选择,如果他们是任何设计的原始研究,调查测试协议的性质,无论是脑震荡或未受伤的参与者。非英文发表、非原创研究或使用显著不同测试方案的文章被排除在外。检索结果为250篇文章,其中11篇符合条件,纳入本综述。纳入的研究由两位作者使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)进行独立的批判性评估。从研究中提取与研究特征和关键发现相关的数据,记录在表格中,并用于对研究结果进行关键的叙述综合。为了提供与评价的每个目标相关的建议,使用了证据强度评分系统。现有证据支持使用BCTT,有力证据支持该测试的安全性和结构有效性,中等证据支持其预后价值。关于bbcbt使用的研究非常有限。结论:本研究结果支持在急性脑震荡、PCS和PPCD的临床治疗中使用BCTT的建议。bbcbt的可用证据有限。需要对这两种测试进行进一步的研究以进一步确定其临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical application of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test and the Buffalo Concussion Bike Test: A systematic review
Objective To identify and synthesise research evidence regarding psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) and Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT) for use with patients with acute concussion, post-concussion syndrome (PCS) or physiological post-concussion disorder (PPCD). Data sources ProQuest (ProQuest Central), PEDro, Medline (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), EBSCOhost (Health collection) and Google Scholar, searched September 8th-12th, 2020. Study selection Two authors independently selected studies that met eligibility criteria. Studies were selected if they were original research of any design, that investigated the properties of the testing protocols in either concussed or uninjured participants. Articles not published in English, that were not original research or that used significantly different testing protocols were excluded. The search yielded 250 articles, 11 of which were eligible and included in this review. Data extraction Included studies were critically appraised independently by two authors, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data relating to study characteristics and key findings were extracted from the studies, documented in tables, and used to inform a critical narrative synthesis of findings. Data synthesis To provide recommendations relating to each aim of the review, a strength of evidence scoring system was used. Available evidence supported use of the BCTT, with strong evidence supporting the safety and construct validity of the test and moderate evidence supporting its prognostic value. There has been very limited research investigating use of the BCBT. Conclusion The findings support a recommendation for use of the BCTT in clinical settings for management of acute concussion, PCS and PPCD. There is limited evidence available for the BCBT. Additional studies are needed of both tests to further establish their clinical value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do concussed and non-concussed head trauma individuals have similar symptoms? A retrospective chart review of chronic post-concussive symptomatology Providing a clearer insight into how sport-related concussion and physical pain impact mental health, cognition, and quality of life Parents’/guardians’ experiences with their adolescents’ prolonged recovery from a sport-related concussion A mixed methods investigation into athletic trainer and dietitian's nutrition practices for sport-related concussion patients Using eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1