调整和监测高中日常CICO的实施情况

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Preventing School Failure Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933
Mimi McGrath Kato, Angus Kittelman, K. Flannery, Dana Cohen Lissman
{"title":"调整和监测高中日常CICO的实施情况","authors":"Mimi McGrath Kato, Angus Kittelman, K. Flannery, Dana Cohen Lissman","doi":"10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous research has demonstrated a need for contextual fit when implementing behavior supports in high schools (Flannery et al., The High School Journal, 96(4), 267–282, 2013; Flannery & Kato, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 69–79, 2017). As high schools move beyond the implementation of Tier 1 and begin to implement Tiers 2 and 3, school implementation teams must identify effective interventions that fit the high school context. The current study assessed whether Check-In Check-Out (CICO; Hawken et al., Responding to problem behavior in schools: The check-in, check-out intervention (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press, 2021), with strategic contextual adaptations, could be implemented with fidelity and whether high daily implementation fidelity was related to student behavior performance. Teacher feedback quality was also explored. Results showed high fidelity implementation at the systems and procedural level for all participants and a significant, small correlation between procedural fidelity and daily points earned.","PeriodicalId":46774,"journal":{"name":"Preventing School Failure","volume":"67 1","pages":"48 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting and monitoring daily CICO implementation in high schools\",\"authors\":\"Mimi McGrath Kato, Angus Kittelman, K. Flannery, Dana Cohen Lissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Previous research has demonstrated a need for contextual fit when implementing behavior supports in high schools (Flannery et al., The High School Journal, 96(4), 267–282, 2013; Flannery & Kato, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 69–79, 2017). As high schools move beyond the implementation of Tier 1 and begin to implement Tiers 2 and 3, school implementation teams must identify effective interventions that fit the high school context. The current study assessed whether Check-In Check-Out (CICO; Hawken et al., Responding to problem behavior in schools: The check-in, check-out intervention (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press, 2021), with strategic contextual adaptations, could be implemented with fidelity and whether high daily implementation fidelity was related to student behavior performance. Teacher feedback quality was also explored. Results showed high fidelity implementation at the systems and procedural level for all participants and a significant, small correlation between procedural fidelity and daily points earned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing School Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,在高中实施行为支持时需要情境契合(Flannery et al., The high School Journal, 96(4), 267-282, 2013;Flannery & Kato,预防学业失败:儿童和青少年的替代教育,61(1),69-79,2017)。随着高中超越第一阶段的实施,开始实施第二和第三阶段,学校实施团队必须确定适合高中背景的有效干预措施。本研究评估了入住-退房(CICO;Hawken et al.,对学校问题行为的回应:签到,签到干预(第3版)。吉尔福德出版社,2021),具有战略情境适应性,可以保真地实施,以及高日常实施保真度是否与学生行为表现有关。对教师反馈质量进行了探讨。结果显示,所有参与者在系统和程序层面上都实现了高保真度,并且程序保真度与每日获得的积分之间存在显著的小相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting and monitoring daily CICO implementation in high schools
Abstract Previous research has demonstrated a need for contextual fit when implementing behavior supports in high schools (Flannery et al., The High School Journal, 96(4), 267–282, 2013; Flannery & Kato, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 69–79, 2017). As high schools move beyond the implementation of Tier 1 and begin to implement Tiers 2 and 3, school implementation teams must identify effective interventions that fit the high school context. The current study assessed whether Check-In Check-Out (CICO; Hawken et al., Responding to problem behavior in schools: The check-in, check-out intervention (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press, 2021), with strategic contextual adaptations, could be implemented with fidelity and whether high daily implementation fidelity was related to student behavior performance. Teacher feedback quality was also explored. Results showed high fidelity implementation at the systems and procedural level for all participants and a significant, small correlation between procedural fidelity and daily points earned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing School Failure
Preventing School Failure EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.
期刊最新文献
The gap between research and practice revisited: Accommodation practices amid the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond Examining behavior specific praise as an individual behavior management strategy in a high-need educational setting Addressing discipline equity: the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA) an alternative to exclusionary discipline Remedial and compensatory writing technologies for middle school students with learning disabilities and their classmates in inclusive classrooms Professional development on the basics of behavior assessment and intervention: training by school district staff for district staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1