可持续油棕榈生产的最佳管理做法:加纳小农户采用的案例

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/14728028.2022.2076747
Richmond Atta-Ankomah, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah
{"title":"可持续油棕榈生产的最佳管理做法:加纳小农户采用的案例","authors":"Richmond Atta-Ankomah, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2022.2076747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The economic potential of oil palm for Ghana and many other developing countries in the tropics is substantial but largely remain unharnessed. Employing both quantitative and qualitative methods including treatment effect models, this study examines the yield difference between adopters and non-adopters of oil palm Best Management Practices (BMPs) among a large number of smallholder farmers and how this may be shaped by factors mostly relating to sectoral innovation system challenges. We found fertiliser application to be the only BMP which independently had a statistically significant yield difference. However, we found further that the adoption of more than any five of the BMPs also had a significant yield difference even after one controls for the effect of fertiliser application. These results tend to vary by the size of the oil palm plots and also appear to be largely associated with differences in the commitment of the farmers to implementing the BMPs, their capacity to absorb the investment cost of adoption and their expected monetary returns on such investment, which are linked to challenges within the oil palm value chain and sectoral innovation system. Our quantitative results are stable under different estimation models and variations in control variables.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"31 1","pages":"123 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best management practices for sustainable oil palm production: the case of smallholder farmers’ adoption in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Richmond Atta-Ankomah, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14728028.2022.2076747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The economic potential of oil palm for Ghana and many other developing countries in the tropics is substantial but largely remain unharnessed. Employing both quantitative and qualitative methods including treatment effect models, this study examines the yield difference between adopters and non-adopters of oil palm Best Management Practices (BMPs) among a large number of smallholder farmers and how this may be shaped by factors mostly relating to sectoral innovation system challenges. We found fertiliser application to be the only BMP which independently had a statistically significant yield difference. However, we found further that the adoption of more than any five of the BMPs also had a significant yield difference even after one controls for the effect of fertiliser application. These results tend to vary by the size of the oil palm plots and also appear to be largely associated with differences in the commitment of the farmers to implementing the BMPs, their capacity to absorb the investment cost of adoption and their expected monetary returns on such investment, which are linked to challenges within the oil palm value chain and sectoral innovation system. Our quantitative results are stable under different estimation models and variations in control variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2022.2076747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2022.2076747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要油棕榈对加纳和许多其他热带发展中国家的经济潜力巨大,但基本上没有受到影响。本研究采用了包括处理效果模型在内的定量和定性方法,考察了大量小农户中采用和未采用油棕最佳管理实践的农户之间的产量差异,以及主要与部门创新系统挑战有关的因素如何影响这一差异。我们发现施肥是唯一一种独立地具有统计学显著产量差异的BMP。然而,我们进一步发现,即使在控制了施肥效果之后,采用任何五种以上的BMP也会产生显著的产量差异。这些结果往往因油棕榈地块的大小而有所不同,而且似乎在很大程度上与农民实施基本建设项目的承诺、吸收采用投资成本的能力以及此类投资的预期货币回报的差异有关,这些差异与油棕榈价值链和部门创新体系内的挑战有关。我们的定量结果在不同的估计模型和控制变量的变化下是稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Best management practices for sustainable oil palm production: the case of smallholder farmers’ adoption in Ghana
ABSTRACT The economic potential of oil palm for Ghana and many other developing countries in the tropics is substantial but largely remain unharnessed. Employing both quantitative and qualitative methods including treatment effect models, this study examines the yield difference between adopters and non-adopters of oil palm Best Management Practices (BMPs) among a large number of smallholder farmers and how this may be shaped by factors mostly relating to sectoral innovation system challenges. We found fertiliser application to be the only BMP which independently had a statistically significant yield difference. However, we found further that the adoption of more than any five of the BMPs also had a significant yield difference even after one controls for the effect of fertiliser application. These results tend to vary by the size of the oil palm plots and also appear to be largely associated with differences in the commitment of the farmers to implementing the BMPs, their capacity to absorb the investment cost of adoption and their expected monetary returns on such investment, which are linked to challenges within the oil palm value chain and sectoral innovation system. Our quantitative results are stable under different estimation models and variations in control variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
期刊最新文献
Perception of agroforestry practices and factors influencing adoption among shifting cultivators in Tripura, India Livelihood benefits and challenges of Acacia decurrens -based agroforestry system in Awi Zone highlands, Northwest Ethiopia The role of learning sources in familiarity with conservation programs: the gendered case of family forest landowners in Georgia, United States Influence of a plant growth booster on the growth and quality parameters of Juniperus polycarpos seedlings under nursery conditions Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. in India: A multipurpose “tree of Heaven” for semi-arid regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1