超越利润主导与投资主导的资本主义:马克思与卡莱茨基论“资本家的消费”与“工人的储蓄”

D. Brennan
{"title":"超越利润主导与投资主导的资本主义:马克思与卡莱茨基论“资本家的消费”与“工人的储蓄”","authors":"D. Brennan","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2111954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capitalist production and distribution processes change over time. Despite these changes, many heterodox theorists still view the economy largely in terms of profit-led or investment-led dynamics, which they attribute to the insights of Karl Marx and Michał Kalecki. This essay argues that these thinkers’ theoretical perspectives were more flexible than today’s theorists, adaptable to a changing capitalism. Marx and Kalecki explicitly entertained theoretical space not just for investment decisions but also for “capitalists’ consumption” and “workers’ savings,” broad categories that also participate in capitalism’s conditions of existence. By exploring this theoretical direction in the work of both Marx and Kalecki, by understanding these categories theoretically, and by tracking how these categories have changed empirically over time, this essay newly appreciates Marx’s and Kalecki’s theoretical contributions, enhancing our understanding of capitalism’s changes over the last fifty years.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Profit-Led versus Investment-Led Capitalism: Marx and Kalecki on “Capitalists’ Consumption” and “Workers’ Savings”\",\"authors\":\"D. Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2111954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capitalist production and distribution processes change over time. Despite these changes, many heterodox theorists still view the economy largely in terms of profit-led or investment-led dynamics, which they attribute to the insights of Karl Marx and Michał Kalecki. This essay argues that these thinkers’ theoretical perspectives were more flexible than today’s theorists, adaptable to a changing capitalism. Marx and Kalecki explicitly entertained theoretical space not just for investment decisions but also for “capitalists’ consumption” and “workers’ savings,” broad categories that also participate in capitalism’s conditions of existence. By exploring this theoretical direction in the work of both Marx and Kalecki, by understanding these categories theoretically, and by tracking how these categories have changed empirically over time, this essay newly appreciates Marx’s and Kalecki’s theoretical contributions, enhancing our understanding of capitalism’s changes over the last fifty years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2111954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2111954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资本主义的生产和分配过程随着时间而变化。尽管发生了这些变化,但许多非正统理论家仍然在很大程度上以利润或投资为主导的动力来看待经济,他们将其归因于卡尔·马克思(Karl Marx)和米克沃夫·卡莱茨基(michaowkalecki)的见解。本文认为,这些思想家的理论视角比今天的理论家更加灵活,能够适应不断变化的资本主义。马克思和卡莱茨基明确地为投资决策提供了理论空间,也为“资本家的消费”和“工人的储蓄”提供了理论空间,这些广泛的范畴也参与了资本主义的生存条件。通过在马克思和卡莱茨基的著作中探索这一理论方向,通过从理论上理解这些范畴,并通过追踪这些范畴随时间的经验变化,本文重新认识了马克思和卡莱茨基的理论贡献,增强了我们对过去五十年资本主义变化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Profit-Led versus Investment-Led Capitalism: Marx and Kalecki on “Capitalists’ Consumption” and “Workers’ Savings”
Capitalist production and distribution processes change over time. Despite these changes, many heterodox theorists still view the economy largely in terms of profit-led or investment-led dynamics, which they attribute to the insights of Karl Marx and Michał Kalecki. This essay argues that these thinkers’ theoretical perspectives were more flexible than today’s theorists, adaptable to a changing capitalism. Marx and Kalecki explicitly entertained theoretical space not just for investment decisions but also for “capitalists’ consumption” and “workers’ savings,” broad categories that also participate in capitalism’s conditions of existence. By exploring this theoretical direction in the work of both Marx and Kalecki, by understanding these categories theoretically, and by tracking how these categories have changed empirically over time, this essay newly appreciates Marx’s and Kalecki’s theoretical contributions, enhancing our understanding of capitalism’s changes over the last fifty years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1